Between Motherhood and Giftedness: Challenges and Opportunities for Gifted Saudi Women – A Mixed Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.10302Keywords:
Giftedness, Motherhood, Psychological Variables, Physical Variables.Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to examine the impact of motherhood, including psychological and physical variables, on women's giftedness, and to explore the effect of family and social responsibilities related to motherhood. It also sought to investigate the pressures from societal and family expectations that affect the giftedness of women, particularly in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach, utilizing a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews for data collection.
Results: The study revealed both positive and temporary negative effects of motherhood on female giftedness. Positive effects were found to contribute to the development of giftedness, while negative effects were mainly related to pregnancy, childbirth, and associated responsibilities. Furthermore, the study found that female talent was more adversely affected after marriage and childbirth compared to male talent, with some negative societal beliefs influencing women's roles. The impact of motherhood on giftedness was also affected by various factors such as social support, personal circumstances, expectations, and government policies.
Conclusions: Motherhood impacts giftedness in various ways, creating both opportunities for growth and temporary challenges. Factors such as social support and government policies play a critical role in balancing motherhood with the development of giftedness.
Downloads
References
Ambrose, D., & Sternberg, R. (2016). Giftedness and talent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-503-6
Arrindell, W. A. (2023). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations: Geert Hofstede, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2001. Behavior Research and Therapy, 41(7), 861–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5
Berniell, I., Berniell, L., De la Mata, D., Fawaz, Y., Machado, M. P., & Marchionni, M. (2022). Motherhood and the allocation of talent. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4063488
Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.). (2019). Handbook of parenting: Volume 3: Being and becoming a parent (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433214
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Corradi, C. (2021). Motherhood and the contradictions of feminism: Appraising claims towards emancipation in the perspective of surrogacy. Current Sociology, 69(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120964910
Creswell, J. W. (2022). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Dai, D. Y., & Li, X. (2020). Behind an accelerated scientific research career: Dynamic interplay of endogenous and exogenous forces in talent development. Education Sciences, 10(9), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090220
David, H., & Khalil, M. (2016). The talented Arab girl: Between tradition and modernism. Gifted and Talented International, 24(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2009.11674862
Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819900585
Hoekzema, E., Barba-Müller, E., & Pozzobon, C. (2017). Pregnancy leads to long-lasting changes in human brain structure. Nature Neuroscience, 20(2), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4458
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Johnsen, S. K. (Ed.). (2018). Making decisions about placement identifying gifted students: A practical guide (3rd ed., pp. 152–187). Routledge.
Kawash, S. (2011). New directions in motherhood studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(4), 969–1003. https://doi.org/10.1086/658637
Kiewra, K., & Witte, A. L. (2018). Prodigies of the prairie: The talent development stories of four elite Nebraska youth performers. Roeper Review, 40(3), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1466841
Kuipers, Y. J., van Beeck, E., Cijsouw, A., & van Gils, Y. (2021). The impact of motherhood on the course of women's psychological well-being. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 6, 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100216
Marland, S. (1971). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. U.S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare..
Marmenout, K., & Lirio, P. (2014). Local female talent retention in the Gulf: Emirati women bending with the wind. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(2), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.826916
National Association for Gifted Children. (2024). Definitions of terms. https://nagc.org/page/definition-terms-faq
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638
Reis, S. M. (2003). Gifted girls, twenty‐five years later: Hopes realized and new challenges found. Roeper Review, 25(4), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554220
Reis, S. M., & Sullivan, E. E. (2009). A theory of talent development in women of accomplishment. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 487–504). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_22
Shaheen, M., Pradhan, S., & Ranajee, R. (2019). Sampling in qualitative research. In Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis (pp. 25–51). IGI Global.
Sternberg, R. J. (2023). Unwrapping gifts: Understanding the inner workings of giftedness through a panoply of paradigms in the field of psychology. Roeper Review, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2023.2172754
Stuckey, H. (2013). Three types of interviews: Qualitative research methods in social health. Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, 1(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-0656.115294
Subotnik, R. F., Assouline, S. G., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2019). An introduction to the special issue: A review of European and American perspectives and research on talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20323
Veldman-de Jonge, I., & Jen, E. (2022). Choices gifted women made in education, personal life, and career: A qualitative study in the Netherlands. Gifted and Talented International, 37(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2022.2075293
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
