The Pragmatic-deliberative Features in Gibran Khalil Gibran’s Novel Wardat al-Hani

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims to analytically delve into the depth of Gibran’s story Wardat al-Hani with reference to two focal points: (a) the social theme around which the novel revolves, and (b) the stylistic mold in which Gibran cast his novel. Harmony, in its analytical aspect, urges the reader not to merely focus on the story's rebellion against customs and values, but to delve deep into its social context. This context revolves around depicting the state of wealth, its inhabitants, and their dominance over the unfortunate, as well as adopting the impact resulting from understanding the intended meanings conveyed by its characters' dialogues.

Methods: The study focused on the contexts and patterns where the pragmatic-deliberative features were evident. The communicative aspect of these features was revealed through a careful analysis of the linguistic message which carries an imaginative world of incidents. These incidents form a narrative structure exchanged by the two characters, Wardah and Rasheed, and the tension in the senders’ relationship allows for wider contexts and diversity in style, structure, linguistic units, phrases, and dialogues. This was done through the descriptive-analytical method; as the analysis in the study focused on the conversations of both Khalil and Warda with Gibran separately, while clarifying Gibran's stance through his narrative (storytelling) characters and his (intermediary) character within the story between the two protagonists (Rashid and Warda).

Results: The study highlighted that the discursive contents intersected between the parties of the story, built upon emotional and rational discourses. Each party in the exchange sought to gain control over the addressee (Gibran), adopting the perspective that the negotiator intended to influence and convince. Rashid presented his emotions in the style of a victim, employing situational norms and customs, while Warda revealed her innate emotions that touched Gibran's ancient sentiments. She then presented the facts and events she wanted Gibran to judge through them. Warda faced her reality with acceptance in her spirit, unlike the angry Rashid who showed discontent with himself.

Conclusions: The exchange between the two characters took place through Gibran in a manner that suited the nature of each one of them, considering the circumstances surrounding them and the social class to which they belong.