The Rulings on the Successive Hands of the Usurper
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/Law.2025.11479Keywords:
Successive hands, usurpation, usurper of the usurper, hand of guarantee, good faith.Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to clarify the concept of successive hands as used in Islamic jurisprudence, explain the rulings related to the successive hands stemming from the usurper’s possession, identify the legal responsibility of each of these hands, and establish the legal foundation for such responsibility in light of both Jordanian civil law and Islamic jurisprudence.
Methods: A descriptive and analytical approach was adopted by presenting the relevant provisions of the Jordanian Civil Code concerning usurpation and analyzing their conformity with the principles and rulings of Islamic jurisprudence.
Results: The Jordanian legislator does not differentiate between the various hands that succeed the usurper’s possession of property. All such hands are treated equally as hands of guarantee, regardless of whether the possession occurred in good faith and based on a lawful transaction, or in bad faith through usurpation or by taking possession from the original usurper.
Conclusion: The Jordanian legislator should take into consideration the principle of good faith in property-related transactions and distinguish between possession acquired through good faith and lawful transactions, and possession resulting from bad faith or usurpation. It is necessary to reconsider the prevailing rule that "every hand resulting from the usurper’s possession is a hand of guarantee" and instead recognize the legal disparity between different types of possession.
Downloads
References
Al-Asfahani, A. (1992). Dictionary of vocabulary. Damascus: Dar Al-Qalam Al-Jami’i.
Al-Fatlawi, S. (2014). The easy explanation of civil law: Sources of obligation (1st ed.). Amman: Dar Al-Jamal Press.
Al-Fayrouz, A. (2004). Al-Mu'jam Al-Wasit (4th ed.). Cairo: Arabic Language Academy, Al-Shorouk International Library.
Al-Hajri, H. (2009). Principles and jurisprudence rules in financial guarantees (Vol. 1, 1st ed.). Riyadh: Dar Knows Ishbilia for Publishing and Distribution.
Al-Hammbubi, M. (2023). Civil liability for consecutive holders: A comparative legal study with Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 1(2), 368–676.
Al-Jubouri, Y. (2024). General theory of obligations and personal rights (Part one): Sources of obligation (1st ed.). Amman: Dar Al-Thaqafa for Publishing and Distribution.
Al-Kasani, A. (2003). Badai' al-Sanai' in the arrangement of Sharia (Vol. 10, 2nd ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.
Al-Khafif, A. (2000). Guarantees in Islamic jurisprudence. Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi.
Al-natsheh, A., & Abu Sulieh, B. (2024). Court authority when a claim of invalidity of registered real estate transactions is proven: Analytical study in accordance with the provisions of Article (13) from the Jordanian Real Property Law and its amendments No. (13) of 2019. Derasat: Sharia and Law Sciences, 52(3), 8802.
Al-Razi, M. (1986). Mukhtar al-Sihah (Rev. ed.). Beirut: Dar Lebanon Library.
Al-Sanhouri, A. (1953). Legal actions and legal facts: Lectures for the Civil Law PhD. Fayoum: Al-Barlaman Printing House.
Al-Waili, M. (1987). The principles of jurisprudence: Their history and impact in Islamic law (1st ed.). Medina: Al-Rehab Press.
Al-Zarqa, M. (1999). Introduction to the general theory of obligations in Islamic jurisprudence (1st ed.). Damascus: Dar Al-Qalam.
Al-Zuhaili, W. (1998). The theory of guarantee: Civil and criminal liability in Islamic jurisprudence: Comparative study. Damascus: Dar Al-Fikr.
Bani Hamad, A., & Alshraida, M. (n.d.). Defenses not cleansed by the endorsement of a check in light of legal provisions and judicial rulings: A comparative study. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), 39, 1–12.
Court of Cassation in its Civil Capacity. (1975, August 14). Decision No. 62/1975 (Five-Member Panel). Qistas Publications.
Court of Cassation in its Civil Capacity. (1975, September 4). Decision No. 366/1974 (Five-Member Panel). Qistas Publications.
Court of Cassation in its Civil Capacity. (2019, March 6). Decision No. 8256/2018 (Five-Member Panel). Qistas Publications.
Damra, A. (2002). The hand between trust and guarantee in Islamic jurisprudence. Yarmouk Research Journal – Human and Social Sciences Series, 18(4), 1484–1518.
Daoud, A., & Qanadilo, N. (2023). Legislative protection for the insured as a consumer from abusive conditions in the insurance contract: A comparative study. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), 37, 1952–1976.
Dodo, M., & Anas, M. (2011). The criterion of hand's status in guarantee: A comparative jurisprudential study. The Jordanian Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(1), 89–110.
Esmaeel, M. (1996). Islamic jurisprudence rules: Between authenticity and direction. Cairo: Dar Al-Manar for Printing and Publishing.
Hassan, A., & Sweidan, H. (n.d.). Conflict of laws over eligibility: Comparative study. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), 37, 1041–1062.
Ibn Manzur, M. (1262). Lisan al-Arab. Dar al-Maaref.
Jordan. (1976). Law No. 43 of 1976 (Civil Code of 1976).
Jordan. (2019). Law No. 13 of 2019 (The Real Estate Property Law).
Saleh, A. (2024). The concept and jurisprudential rulings of usurpation: Comparative study with Yemeni law. Arab Journal for Islamic and Sharia Studies, 30, 309–342.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dirasat: Shari'a and Law Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-07-09
Published 2025-08-28


