بنو إسرائيل في اللفيفة ( أ ) من وثيقة دمشق ما بين القرآن الكريم والكتاب المقدس: دراسة مقارنة

Raed Saeed Bani Abdul Rahman; Susan Rakan Shakhatrah

doi:10.35516/law.v52i1.6947

Authors

Raed Saeed Bani Abdul Rahman Department of Fundamentals of Religion, Faculty of Sharia, Yarmouk University, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1007-9368
Susan Rakan Shakhatrah Department of Fundamentals of Religion, Faculty of Sharia, Yarmouk University, Jordan https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8319-1905

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v52i1.6947

Keywords:

Damascus document, Qumran coils, Holy Quran, bible

Abstract

Objectives: This research discusses the Damascus Document, which was discovered at the end of the 19th century. It presents part of the first section of its contents, specifically scroll (A) related to the Israelites, introduces and analyzes this content, highlights the most important issues mentioned in the document, and identifies intersections with the Quran and the Bible. It compares the findings among the three sources.

Methods: The study used the inductive method by examining texts related to the Israelites in scroll (A) of the Damascus Document. They also employed the analytical method based on the content of these texts and the comparative method between the contents of the Damascus Document and those of the Quran and the Bible.

Results: The events and occurrences mentioned in scroll (A) of the Damascus Document concerning the Israelites align with many events mentioned in the Quran and the Bible. This indicates that the Damascus Document contains a significant portion of prophetic revelation and may indeed be remnants of the true Torah and Gospel.

Conclusion: The study recommends giving more attention to the Damascus Document, further researching these valuable sources, and re-studying them in light of the Quranic text and the Hadith of the Prophet.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Kadhi, M. The Dead Sea Scrolls, the Arabic Paper.

Bays, J. F. The threefold division of the law, salt & Light series.

Bright, J. (1981). A History of Israel. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

Burt, K. h. (2014). Ritual in the Damascus Document and the Gospel of Matthew, University of St Andrews.

Crawford, S. W. (2003). Not According to Rule: Women, the Dead Sea Scrolls and Qumran. Lincoln, University of Nebraska.

David W, K. (2012). Hearing the Unsung Voice: Women in the Qumran Community. international Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(19).

Eisenman, J. (1997). the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls. New York viking.

Fraade, S. (2018). History in Damascus Document. Dead Sea Scrolls. (25), 412-428.

Grossman, M. L. (2002). Reading for History in the Damascus Document. Brill Boston.

Grossman, M. (2004). Reading for Gender in the Damascus Document, Dead Sea Discoveries. Brill, 11(2).

Harrington, H. (2006). The Purity Texts. London, T &T Clark international.

Hempel, C. (2000). Damascus texts. England. Sheffield academic press.

Hempel, C. (1998). The Laws of the Damascus Document. Boston, Brill.

Howlett. (1957). The Essenes and Christianity: An interpretation of the Dead Sea Scroll. New York Harper.

Jones, A. C. (1992). An Appraisal Of The Damascus Document And Its Significance For The Qumran Community. Unpublished Master thesis, Department of Theology, The University of Durham.

Khan, K. S. The Teacher of Righteousness of the Dead Sea Scrolls and whether He Could Be Jesus. Australia.

Kirchheiner, H. I. (2018). Revitalization in Judea: An Anthropological Study of the Damascus Document. Unpublished Master thesis, Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, University of Birmingham.

Knibb, M. (2009). Exile in Damascus Document. Brill.

Lemche, N. (1998). The Israelites in History and Tradition. Library of Ancient Israel.

Millar, B. (1955). Dead Sea Scrolls. Viking adult.

Neusner, J. By the Testimony of Two Witnesses in the Damascus Document. Peeters Publishers. Revue de Qumrân, 8(2).

Noth, M. (1954). Geschichte Israels. The Society of Biblical Literature.

Pardo, D. (2010). A Statistical Identity for the Teacher of Righteousness in the Dead Sea Scrolls. university of phoenix.

Philip, R. D. (1983). The Damascus Covenant. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Qimron, E. (1994). Further Observations on the Laws of Oaths in the Damascus Document. The Jewish Quarterly Review, (85), 251-257.

Rand, W. W. (1886). Dictionary of the Holy Bible. N. Y.

Schiffman, L. (1975). The Halakhah at Qumran. Brill.

Tigchelaa, E. (2018). Thou Shalt Not Kill in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Narrative and Halakah. vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Venter, P. (2003). Historical review in the Damascus Document. Universiteit van Pretoria.

Vuong, L. C. (2013). Gender and Purity in the Protoevangelium of James. Germany, Mohr siebeck.

Wacholder, B. Z. (2007). The New Damascus Document: The Midrash on the Eschatological Torah of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Reconstruction, Translation and Commentary. Brill.

Wacholder, B. Z. (2007). the New Damascus Document: The Midrash on The Eschatological Torah. Boston. Brill.

Wassen, C. (2003). Women in the Damascus Document. McMaster university.

Weinfeld, M. (1984). Inheritance of the Land — Privilege versus Obligation: The Concept of the Promised Land in the Sources. Historical Society of Israel, (49),115-137.

Wells, B. (2004). The Law of Testimony in the Pentateuchal Code. Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Werrett, I. C. (2007). Ritual Purity and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Boston. Brill.