Forms of Procedural Abuse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v52i4.7798

Keywords:

Child, Electronic Games, Sexual Exploitation, Internet, Websites, Criminal Protection.

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to elucidate the extent of legal protection provided by criminal laws in Jordan and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in deterring both general and specific crimes of child sexual exploitation through electronic games, considering them as crucial means exploited by criminals to commit this heinous and despicable crime against the most vulnerable segments of society.

Methods: The study followed a descriptive, analytical, and comparative methodology. The descriptive approach involved studying the relevant Jordanian and Emirati laws concerning child sexual exploitation through electronic games. The analytical approach entailed analyzing these laws, while the comparative approach involved comparing Jordanian and Emirati laws to highlight strengths and weaknesses in each law.

Results: The study found that the Jordanian legislator did not explicitly stipulate the necessary measures to protect children from the sexual exploitation they may encounter. In contrast, the Emirati legislator explicitly included such measures as they directly contribute to both treatment and prevention to prevent child sexual exploitation.

Conclusions: The study recommends that the Jordanian legislator explicitly include provisions in the Jordanian Electronic Crimes Law, as the Emirati legislator did in the Emirati Electronic Crimes Law, regarding the crime of electronic sexual harassment. Additionally, the study suggests that the Jordanian legislator should add necessary measures to protect children from sexual exploitation in the Jordanian Child Rights Law, similar to those included by the Emirati legislator in Article (54) of the Child Rights Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, A. (2006). Abuse of the right to litigation between the Islamic system and the legal systems. New University Publishing House.

Abdel Tawab, A. (2009a). Abuse in litigation and implementation procedures in the Egyptian Code of Procedure and Implementation: A comparative fundamental study. New University House.

Abdel Tawab, A. (2009b). The general theory of procedural right. Hodeidah University Press.

Al-Aqili, E. (2008). Abuse of power in administrative decisions. Dar Qandil for Publishing and Distribution.

Al-Furaih, S. (1999). Al-Nabigha Al-Dhibani linguistic dictionary. Arabic Lexical Association.

Al-Hadidi, A. (2015). Abuse of the procedural right in civil lawsuits (1st ed.). Modern Book Foundation.

Al-Hadidi, A. (2018). The abuse of the procedural right in civil lawsuits and its practical applications in comparative law. Legal Books House.

Al-Minshawi, A. (2024). Adversarial procedures in lawsuits in civil, commercial, economic, and family matters. New University House.

Al-Zamakhshari, M. (n.d.). Dictionary of meanings. Al-Maani website. https://www.almaany.com

Craig, L. (2024). Expert witnesses. In G. Baker (Ed.), Psychology and the law: Case studies of expert witnesses—How expert witness evidence can go wrong: A concluding note (pp. 433–438). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394155767.ch20

Dowidar, T. (2003). Postponing the lawsuit. Mansha’at Al-Ma’arif.

Egyptian Court of Cassation. (1991, March 24). Appeal No. (1238 Civil of 56 BC). East Laws Network.

Egyptian Court of Cassation. (2001, December 24). Appeal No. (1844 of 2001). East Laws Network.

Egyptian Court of Cassation. (2018, March 17). Appeal No. (73052/2018). East Laws Network.

Egyptian Supreme Administrative Court. (2019, November 16). Appeal No. (11643/2019). East Laws Network.

Federal Decree Law No. (42) of 2022 promulgating the Civil Procedure Code.

Federal Law No. (21) of 2022 issuing the regulation of the expertise profession before judicial authorities.

Federal Law No. (5) of 1985 promulgating the UAE Civil Transactions Law.

Federal Supreme Court Appeal No. 1254/2024, dated January 10, 2024, published on the Laws Portal, Ministry of Justice website.

Federal Supreme Court. (2001, April 28). Appeal No. 354 of Judicial Year 22. East Laws Network.

Federal Supreme Court. (2013, May 29). Appeal No. (102 of 2013). East Laws Network.

Federal Supreme Court. (2015, November 15). Appeal No. (454 of Judicial Year 25). Ministry of Justice website.

Federal Supreme Court. (2018, November 27). Appeal No. (3/2018). Ministry of Justice website.

Federal Supreme Court. (2019, December 11). Appeal No. (542,618 of 2019). Ministry of Justice website.

Federal Supreme Court. (2020, May 18). Appeal No. (199 of 2020). East Laws Network.

Ghazi, A. (2020). The role of judicial officers in achieving justice. Modern University Office.

Harja, M. (2016). Provisions on malicious litigation and abuse of the right to litigate in light of jurisprudence and judiciary. Mahmoud Publishing House.

Health, P. (2023, September 25). The right of defense to confrontation and litigation. Lawyers website mohamoon-uae.com.

Kampourakis, L. (2023). Reappropriating the rule of law: Between constituting and limiting private power. Hybrid Gold Open Access• Green Open Access, 14(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2022.2119016

Lavryk, H. (2023). Arbitrariness prevention in the context of achieving the efficiency of the rule of law. Europe, 6(1), 54–68.

Law No. (13) of 1968 promulgating the Civil and Commercial Procedures Law.

Shalala, N. (2006). Claims of abuse and abuse of rights. Al-Halabi Legal Publications.

Turki, A. (2011). The right to litigation between legitimate use and abuse in the field of civil, commercial, and personal status lawsuits. Bahrain College of Law Journal, 8(1), 105–119.

Turki, A. (2015). UAE Civil Procedure Code. Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya

Downloads

Published

2025-05-04

How to Cite

Torki, A. A., & Almarzouqi , N. I. ahmed. (2025). Forms of Procedural Abuse. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 52(4), 7798. https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v52i4.7798

Issue

Section

Law
Received 2024-05-28
Accepted 2024-12-22
Published 2025-05-04