منهج الاستقراء الأصولي عند الفقهاء: دراسة تأصيلية تطبيقية

Rohile Gharaibeh; Reem Azzam Alsalus

doi:10.35516/law.v52i4.9663

Authors

Rohile Gharaibeh Department of Islamic Jurisprudence and its Foundation, School of Sharia, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-9720
Reem Azzam Alsalus Department of Islamic Jurisprudence and its Foundation, School of Sharia, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-4053

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v52i4.9663

Keywords:

fundamentalists, induction, establishing the legal ruling, scientific method, Islamic jurisprudence, legal theory, usul al-fiqh

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to examine the authority of inductive reasoning in Islamic jurisprudence, its role in deriving legal rulings, and the extent to which different Islamic schools recognize it as a valid legal proof.

Methods: The study employs inductive, analytical, and historical methodologies to define induction and assess its significance in Islamic jurisprudence. It also analyzes the legal evidence supporting its authority by reviewing the views of jurists and scholars of Islamic legal theory. The study examines the legal proofs that validate its use by tracking the statements of jurists and legal theorists regarding its application in argumentation and evidence, especially in formulating legal and jurisprudential principles by examining similar cases. Additionally, it clarifies how legal theorists use induction to derive both general and specific objectives of Sharia. The study also focuses on the method used by jurists to establish legal rulings in cases where there is no direct text from the Qur’an or Sunnah, using induction.

Results: The findings indicate that inductive reasoning is widely accepted among Islamic jurists, though the degree of its authority varies across different schools of thought. It is recognized as a crucial tool for establishing jurisprudential principles and understanding the objectives of Islamic law.

Conclusions: The study concludes that inductive reasoning is a credible and valuable method in Islamic legal scholarship. It recommends that further attention be given to this method in Islamic legal education to enhance its application in deriving rulings and legal principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu al-Muzaffar, M. bin M. bin A. (1999). Qawati' al-Adillah (M. H. M. H. Ismail al-Shafi'i, Trans.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Abu Yala, M. bin al-Husayn bin al-Farra'. (1990). Al-‘Iddah (D. A. bin A. bin Sier al-Mubarak, Trans.). King Saud University.

Abu Zahra, M. (n.d.). Usul al-Fiqh. Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi.

Al-Asfahani, M. bin A. (1999). Sharh Minhaj al-Usul (A. D. Al-Namla, Trans.). Maktabat al-Rushd.

Al-Babarti, A. D. (n.d.). Al-Aynayah Sharh al-Hidayah. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Bahari, H. A. al-Shakur. (n.d.). Muslim al-Thubut ma'a Hashiyatihi Fawatih al-Rahmout. Matba'at al-Husseiniyyah.

Al-Bahasin, Y. (1998). Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyyah (1st ed.). Maktabat al-Rushd.

Al-Baji, S. bin Khalf. (1995). Ihkam al-Fusul (A. Majid Tarki, Trans.). Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.

Al-Bannani, A. (n.d.). Hashiyat al-Bannani 'ala Sharh Jalal al-Din al-Mahalli 'ala Jama' al-Jawami'. Issa al-Halabi.

Al-Bugha, M. (n.d.). Athar al-Adillah al-Mukhtalaf Fiha fi al-Fiqh al-Islami. Dar al-Imam al-Bukhari.

Al-Bukhari, A. D. Bukhari al-Hanafi. (n.d.). Kashf al-Asrar. Dar al-Kitab al-Islami.

Al-Bukhari, M. bin I. (1422). Sahih al-Bukhari. Dar Tawq al-Najat.

Al-Dardir, A. M. (1952). Al-Sharh al-Saghir ma'a Hashiyat al-Saawi. Maktabat Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi.

Al-Dusuqi, A. A. (n.d.). Hashiyat al-Dusuqi 'ala al-Sharh al-Kabir. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Isnawi, J. D. (1998). Nihayat al-Sul (A. H. Ali Abu Zayid, Trans.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Jassas, A. bin A. (1973). Ahkam al-Quran (M. S. al-Qumahawi, Trans.). Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-Arabi.

Al-Mawardi, A. (1998). Al-Hawi al-Kabir (A. A. al-Mukhtar, Trans.). Dar al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Mazri, A. (1991). Al-Mujtaba fi Usul al-Fiqh (F. A. al-Murtada, Trans.). Dar al-Turath al-Arabi.

Al-Mazri, A. (1992). Al-Risalah al-Islamiyyah (M. F. al-Jabari, Trans.). Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.

Al-Nasafi, N. (1992). Al-Wafi fi al-Usul (S. A. al-Mahmoud, Trans.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Nawawi, Y. (1999). Al-Majmu' Sharh al-Muhadhdhab (M. A. al-Qudsi, Trans.). Dar al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Qaradhawi, Y. (1998). Fiqh al-Zakat (3rd ed.). Dar al-Tawfiq.

Al-Qarafi, A. (1987). Al-Furuq (A. T. al-Harbi, Trans.). Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.

Al-Qurtubi, M. A. (1986). Al-Jami' li-Ahkam al-Quran (J. I. al-Mu'awwad, Trans.). Dar al-Maktabah al-Turath al-Islami.

Al-Samarqandi, A. (1992). Usul al-Fiqh (A. A. al-Muhammad, Trans.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Shafi'i, M. (1989). Al-Risalah (M. A. al-Mahmoud, Trans.). Dar al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Shafi'i, M. A. (1979). Al-Risalah (A. A. al-Saqqaf, Trans.). Dar al-Ma'arif.

Al-Shanqiti, M. A. (1986). Adwa' al-Bayan fi Idah al-Quran bi al-Quran (A. A. al-Sayyid, Trans.). Dar al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Subki, T. (1994). Al-Ibhaj fi Sharh al-Minhaj (A. A. al-Rahman, Trans.). Dar al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Taftazani, M. bin Sa'd. (n.d.). Sharh al-Talweeh. Maktabat Sabih.

Al-Tahawi, A. (1998). Sharh Ma'ani al-Athar (M. T. al-Qadri, Trans.). Dar al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Tahawi, M. bin A. (1996). Kashaf Istilahat al-Funun wa al-Uloom (A. D. Hroj, Trans.). Maktabat Lebanon.

Al-Tirmidhi, M. bin Sura. (1996). Jami' al-Tirmidhi. Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.

Al-Zuhaili, W. (1997). Usul al-Fiqh al-Islami (6th ed.). Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Zurqani, M. (2003). Sharh Al Muwatta. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Anwar, S. (2017). The relation between Arabic linguistics and Islamic legal reasoning: Islamic legal theory perspective. Al-Jāmi‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(2), 463–492.

Anwar, S. (2017). The relation between Arabic linguistics and Islamic legal reasoning: Islamic legal theory perspective. Al-Jāmi‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(2), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2017.552.463-492.

Aristotle. (1948). Aristotle's logic (A. Badawi, Trans.). Dar al-Kutub al-Misriyah.

Habnaka, A. H. (1988). Dawabit al-Ma'rifah (3rd ed.). Dar al-Qalam.

Hasb Allah, A. (1976). Usul al-Tashree' al-Islami (5th ed.). Dar al-Ma'arif.

Ibn Abdul Barr, A. O. Y. bin A. (n.d.). Al-Tamhid (M. A. al-Alawi & M. A. al-Bakri, Trans.). Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs.

Ibn al-Humam, M. bin A. (n.d.). Fath al-Qadeer. Dar al-Fikr.

Ibn al-Najjar, A. B. M. bin A. bin A. (1997). Sharh al-Kawkab al-Muneer (M. al-Zuhaili & N. Hamad, Trans.). Maktabat al-Obeikan.

Ibn al-Qayyim, M. bin A. bin A. (1991). I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in (M. A. Ibrahim, Trans.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Amir al-Hajj, M. bin M. (1983). Al-Taqreer wa al-Tahbeer (2nd ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Ashour, M. T. (2011). Maqasid al-Shari'ah al-Islamiyyah. Dar al-Salam.

Ibn Daqiq al-Eid, M. bin A. bin W. (n.d.). Ihkam al-Ihkam Sharh Umda al-Ahkam. Matba'at al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyah.

Ibn Hazm, A. M. A. bin A. (1990). Al-Taqreeb li Had al-Mantiq (I. Abbas, Trans.). Dar Maktabah al-Hayat.

Ibn Manzur, J. D. (1993). Lisan al-Arab (3rd ed.). Dar al-Sader.

Ibn Qudamah, A. (1999). Al-Mughni (M. H. al-Rahman, Trans.). Dar al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Qudamah, M. D. A. bin A. (1968). Al-Mughni. Maktabat al-Qahira.

Ibn Rushd, A. W. M. bin A. (1995). Bidayat al-Mujtahid (K. al-Attar, Trans.). Dar al-Fikr.

Moussa, A. (2001–2002). The evidence of induction and its impact on Islamic Sharia: The chapter of worship as an applied model (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Algiers, Faculty of Fundamentals of Religion.

Sa, S., Mubarrak, H., Hamdiah, H., & Kjoor, A. M. K. (2024). IMKĀNIYĀT AL-IJTIHĀD AL-ISTIṢLĀHĪ WA ISHĀMĀTUHU LI HALL AL-QADHĀYĀ AL-FIQHIYYAH AL-MU’ĀṢARAH: DIRĀSAT FĪ FATĀWĀ JĀ’IHAH COVID FĪ INDONESIA. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 24(1), 198-212.

Tag al-Din, S. I. (2023). An approach to economic rules through the maxims of fiqh. King Abdulaziz University Journal of Islamic Economics, 35(3), 103–111.