دور القلق المناخي في تفسير السلوك الاستهلاكي منخفض الكربون لدى الطلبة العُمانيين: دراسة تفسيرية باستخدام نمذجة المعادلات البنائية

المؤلفون

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/Edu.2026.14512

الكلمات المفتاحية:

القلق المناخي، الكفاءة الذاتية البيئية، السلوك منخفض الكربون\، نمذجة المعادلات البنائية.

الملخص

الأهداف: هدفت الدراسة الحالية إلى فحص العلاقات المباشرة وغير المباشرة بين الكفاءة الذاتية البيئية، والقلق المناخي، والسلوك منخفض الكربون لدى الطلبة العُمانيين باستخدام نمذجة المعادلات البنائية.

المنهجية: اتبعت الدراسة المنهج الوصفي الارتباطي، وتكونت عينة الدراسة من (196) طالباً وطالبة من الصف الحادي عشر، وقد تم اختيار عينة الدراسة بطريقة العينة المتاحة من مدارس مختلفة بمحافظة مسقط.

النتائج: أظهرت نتائج نمذجــة المعــادلات البنائية أن النموذج المقتــرح يتمتع بدرجة عالية من المطابقة للبيانـات (χ²/df = 1.55, CFI= 0.973, TLI= 0.973, RMSEA= 0.053)، وكشفت النتائج عن تأثير مباشر قوي للكفاءة الذاتية البيئية على السلوك منخفض الكربون (β= 0.80, p< 0.001)، كما تبين وجود أثر غير مباشر للقلق المناخي على السلوك منخفض الكربون عبر الكفاءة الذاتية البيئية (β= 0.33, p< 0.001)، مما يدعم دور الكفاءة الذاتية البيئية كمتغير وسيط في العلاقة بين القلق المناخي، والسلوك منخفض الكربون.

الخلاصة: تخلص الدراسة إلى أن الكفاءة الذاتية البيئية تمثل آلية وسيطة أساسية تفسر تأثير القلق المناخي في السلوك منخفض الكربون، بما يعزز أهمية توظيف المتغيرات النفسية الوسيطة عند تفسير السلوكيات البيئية.

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

المراجع

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.

Boehme, B., Kinsman, L., Norrie, H., Tessier, É., et al. (2024). Climate anxiety: Current evidence and future directions. Current Psychiatry Reports, 26(11), 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01538-9

Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Steg, L. (2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62, Article 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061

Cedrún-Vázquez, E., Núñez-Ríos, J. E., Sánchez-García, J. Y., Sosa-Gómez, G., & Rojas, O. (2025). Structural equation modeling for analyzing pro-environmental behavior in Switzerland. Sustainability, 17(8), Article 3624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083624

Chan, H., Tam, K., & Clayton, S. (2024). Testing an integrated model of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 97, Article 102368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102368

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Crandon, T. J., Scott, J. G., Charlson, F. J., & Thomas, H. J. (2022). A social-ecological perspective on climate anxiety in children and adolescents. Nature Climate Change, 12, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01251-y

Daeninck, C., Kioupi, V., & Vercammen, A. (2023). Climate anxiety, coping strategies and planning for the future in environmental degree students in the UK. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1126031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126031

Ding, Z., Jiang, X., Liu, Z., Long, R., Xu, Z., & Cao, Q. (2018). Factors affecting low-carbon consumption behavior of urban residents: A comprehensive review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.013

Elyssa, A., Levine, P., Lane, K. J., & Corlin, L. (2024). Climate stress and anxiety, environmental context, and civic engagement: A nationally representative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, Article 102220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102220

Eser, M. T. (2022). A survey study for the comparison of meta-analysis softwares. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.747948

Ghaleb, M., & Yaşlıoğlu, M. (2024). Structural equation modeling (SEM) for social and behavioral sciences studies: Steps, sequence, and explanation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Review, 6(1), 69–108.

Ghazali, E. M., Nguyen, B., Mutum, D. S., & Yap, S. F. (2019). Pro-environmental behaviours and value-belief-norm theory: Assessing unobserved heterogeneity of two ethnic groups. Sustainability, 11(12), Article 3237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123237

Hampton, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2023). Choices for climate action: A review of the multiple roles individuals play. One Earth, 6(9), 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.006

Heeren, A., Mouguiama-Daouda, C., & McNally, R. J. (2023). A network approach to climate change anxiety and its key related features. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 93, Article 102625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102625

Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & Van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863–e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change widespread, rapid, and intensifying – IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/2021/08/09/ar6-wg1-20210809-pr/

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Summary for policymakers.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

Ivanova, D., Barrett, J., Wiedenhofer, D., Macura, B., Callaghan, M., & Creutzig, F. (2020). Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), Article 093001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589

Khalaim, O., & Budziszewska, M. (2024). It should not only be technical education: Students' climate anxiety experiences and expectations toward university education in three European universities. The Journal of Environmental Education, 55(4), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2024.2339824

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.

Leiserowitz, A., Carman, J., Buttermore, N., Wang, X., Rosenthal, S., Marlon, J. R., & Mulcahy, K. (2021). International public opinion on climate change. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/international-public-opinion-on-climate-change/

Long, Y., Yoshida, Y., Jiang, Y., Huang, L., Wang, W., Mi, Z., Shigetomi, Y., & Kanemoto, K. (2023). Japanese urban household carbon footprints during the early-stage COVID-19 pandemic were consistent with those over the past decade. npj Urban Sustainability, 3, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-023-00112-5

Maduneme, E. (2024). Some slice of climate anxiety is good: A cross-sectional survey exploring the relationship between college students' media exposure and perceptions about climate change. Journal of Health Communication, 29(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2354370

Marzban, A., Marzaleh, M., Razmi, M., & Emami, P. (2025). Climate change: Educational needs of students. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 12, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.34172/EHEM.1361

Moeller, L., & Stahlmann, G. (2019). Development and initial validation of the Environmental Self-Efficacy Scale: Assessing confidence in overcoming barriers to pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 3(2–3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-019-00023-y

Nurramadhani, A., Riandi, R., Permanasari, A., & Suwarma, R. (2022). Low carbon education: Students' understanding, applications in daily life, and science learning. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17(Special Issue), 101–109.

Ojala, M., Cunsolo, A., Ogunbode, C. A., & Middleton, J. (2021). Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Priya, K., & Thenmozhi, S. (2021). Study on self-efficacy and pro-environmental behavior among school students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 9(2), 1851–1858. https://doi.org/10.25215/0902.184

Qin, Z., Wu, Q., Bi, C., Deng, Y., & Hu, Q. (2024). The relationship between climate change anxiety and pro-environmental behavior in adolescents: The mediating role of future self-continuity and the moderating role of green self-efficacy. BMC Psychology, 12(1), Article 241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01746-1

Sadenova, A., Denissova, O., Kozlova, M., Rakhimova, S., Gola, A., & Suieubayeva, S. (2025). Structural equation modeling (SEM) in Jamovi: An example of analyzing the impact of factors on enterprise innovation activity. Applied Computer Science, 21(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.35784/acs_7037

Sanson, A. V., Van Hoorn, J., & Burke, S. E. L. (2019). Responding to the impacts of the climate crisis on children and youth. Child Development Perspectives, 13(4), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12342

Sarrasin, O., Henry, J. L. A., Masserey, C., & Graff, F. (2022). The relationships between adolescents' climate anxiety, efficacy beliefs, group dynamics, and pro-environmental behavioral intentions after a group-based environmental education intervention. Youth, 2(3), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2030031

Stewart, A. E. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Climate Change Worry Scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), Article 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020494

Tam, K., & Chen, H. (2023). Climate change anxiety in China (Thought Leadership Brief No. 84). Institute for Emerging Market Studies, HKUST. https://iems.hkust.edu.hk/

Tarka, P. (2018). An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 313–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8

Tian, J., Sun, M., Gong, Y., Chen, X., & Sun, Y. (2022). Chinese residents' attitudes toward consumption-side climate policy: The role of climate change perception and environmental topic involvement. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182, Article 106294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106294

Turcotte-Tremblay, A. M., Fortier, G., Bélanger, R. E., Dion, C., Gansaonré, J., Leatherdale, S., & Haddad, S. (2024). Adolescents' impairment due to climate anxiety is associated with self-efficacy and behavioral engagement: A cross-sectional analysis in Quebec (Canada). BMC Public Health, 24, Article 20333. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20333-y

UNESCO & Monitoring and Evaluating Climate Communication and Education (MECCE). (2024). Education and climate change: Learning to act for people and planet. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/GVXA4765

Verplanken, B., Marks, E., & Dobromir, A. I. (2020). On the nature of eco-anxiety: How constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, Article 101528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101528

Wang, T., Shen, B., & Ma, T. (2024). Individual low-carbon behaviors and influencing factors: Insights from a behavior survey study in China. Heliyon, 10(10), Article e31094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31094

Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3

Whitmarsh, L., Mitev, K., Nash, N., Hoolohan, C., Poortinga, W., Whittle, C., Haggar, P., Tipping, C., Dudley, H., Turner, L., Carr, D., Verplanken, B., Felder, L., & Graham, H. (2025). Moments of change and low-carbon behaviors: A multidisciplinary systematic review. WIREs Climate Change, 16, e954. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.954

Woraphong, S. (2025). Relationship between environmental education and environmental sustainable development. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n3p251

Wullenkord, M. C., Tröger, J., Hamann, K. R. S., Loy, L. S., & Reese, G. (2021). Anxiety and climate change: A validation of the Climate Anxiety Scale in a German-speaking quota sample and an investigation of psychological correlates. Climatic Change, 168, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03234-6

Xiang, C., & Liu, N. (2024). Factors and paths influencing students' low-carbon behavior. Carbon Management, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2349173

Yangailo, T., Researcher, I., & Mpundu, M. (2024). The role of product-service design and strategic planning. International Journal of Economic Behavior, 14(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.14276/2285-0430.4311

Yue, Z., & Hu, X. (2021). Cultivation of college students' low-carbon consumption behaviours based on mobile education: A behavioural view. E3S Web of Conferences, 292, Article 02040. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129202040

Zhu, W., Li, D., & Liu, W. (2026). From intention to action: Modeling student lifestyle carbon emissions and reduction scenarios. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 21, Article 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100391

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-07-15

إصدار

القسم

المناهج والتدريس

كيفية الاقتباس

Al-Yaarubi, R., & Al-Maamari, S. (2026). دور القلق المناخي في تفسير السلوك الاستهلاكي منخفض الكربون لدى الطلبة العُمانيين: دراسة تفسيرية باستخدام نمذجة المعادلات البنائية. دراسات: العلوم التربوية, 54(1), 14512. https://doi.org/10.35516/Edu.2026.14512