The Effectiveness of a Developed Educational Program Based on Matthew Lipman’s Philosophy for Children (P4C) Theory in Enhancing Philosophical Thinking Among Students in the First Three Primary Grades in Jordan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.11428

Keywords:

Matthew Lipman's P4C Theory, the Developed Program for Enhancing Philosophical Thinking.

Abstract

Objectives: This study explored the effectiveness of a developed educational program based on Matthew Lipman's Philosophy for Children (P4C) in fostering philosophical thinking among early-grade students in Jordan. It aimed to address challenges and negative perceptions surrounding philosophy in Arab communities by offering a structured program to support children's philosophical development.

Methods: The study adopted an experimental approach using a quasi-experimental design. The participants consisted of 55 third-grade students at the University of Jordan School, divided into an experimental group that received the developed educational program and a control group that did not. A philosophical thinking skills scale was administered to both groups before and after the intervention, after verifying its validity and reliability.

Results: The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the developed program in enhancing philosophical thinking skills. Statistically significant differences were found in all philosophical thinking skills in favor of the experimental group. The influence of the program on specific skills was ranked as follows: intellectual tolerance (47.3%), critique and scrutiny (36%), dialogue (21.9%), analysis and synthesis (19.3%), methodological doubt (15.8%), and prediction and future foresight (15.2%). Statistically significant gender differences were observed in favor of females in the skills of critique and scrutiny and methodological doubt.

Conclusions: The study concluded that it is important to begin implementing the developed program for students in the first three grades, as it is a scientifically grounded program that fosters the development of philosophical thinking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akpojaro, J. Firth, R. & Lacey, M. (2022). Understanding Philosophy. London: Usborne publishing LTD

Anderson, A. (2020). Categories of Goals in Philosophy for Children. Studies in Philosophy and Education, (39), 607-623.

Arda, T. B., Burroughs, M. D., & Moore, G. (2022). Effects of philosophical ethics in early childhood on preschool children's social–emotional competence and theory of mind. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 16(1), 5.‏

Ciubotariu, I. I. (2024). Reflections: Enhancing critical thinking in science education by implementing philosophy elements into training. mSphere, 9(7), e00399-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00399-24

Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. (2005). Philosophie – eine Schule der Freiheit, Philosophieren mit Kindern weltweit und in Deutschland. Bonn

DK (2022). What's the Point of Philosophy? (DK What's the Point of?). USA

DK (2022). Children's book of Philosophy? (DK What's the Point of?). USA

Favero, L., Pérez-Ortiz, J. A., Käser, T., & Oliver, N. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking in education by means of a Socratic chatbot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05511. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05511

Gaut, B., & Gaut, M. (2013). Philosophy for young children: a practical guide. Routledge. USA‏

International Council of Philosophical Inquiry with Children. (2023). What Is philosophy for/ with Children? From https://www.icpic.org/

Işıklar, S., & Öztürk, Y. A. (2022). The effect of philosophy for children (P4C) curriculum on critical thinking through philosophical inquiry and problem-solving skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1), 130-142.‏

Karadağ, F. (2023). Çocuklar için felsefe öğretim programının özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan çocukların soru oluşturma becerileri üzerine etkisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (AUJEF), 7(3), 570-587.

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge university press.‏

Lipman, M. (1976). Lisa. New Jersey: Montclair State College, Upper Montclair'.

Morris, M.J.L. (2017). An Examination of Philosophy with Children as a Material discursive Practice in a Year 7 Classroom. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Wales Trinity Saint David

Oyler, J. (2016). Philosophy with children: The Lipman-Sharp approach to philosophy for children. In Peters, M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory.

OZTURK, O., & Günay, K. (2023). Integrating Critical Thinking by P4Cs Into EFL Classes Through Integrated Language Skills. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 1(4).

Petropoulos, G. (2021). Fink’s notion of play in the context of philosophical inquiry with children. Childhood and Philosophy, 17, 1-24.

Serin, N. (2023). The effect of philosophy for children and communitues (P4C) on preservice teachers’ attitudes to critical thinking and perception of critical reading self-efficacy. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 8(20), 384-415.‏

Topping, K. J. (2023). Improving Thinking in the Classroom: What Works for Enhancing Cognition. Taylor & Francis.‏

Unal, U., & Gunes, G. (2024). The effect of Philosophy for Children (P4C) activities on the development of moral perception and social rules of preschool children. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 5(2), 238-255.‏

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Philosophy

How to Cite

Al Huarrat, A. H. M., & Al-Qudah, “Mohammed A. H. (2026). The Effectiveness of a Developed Educational Program Based on Matthew Lipman’s Philosophy for Children (P4C) Theory in Enhancing Philosophical Thinking Among Students in the First Three Primary Grades in Jordan. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 53(12), 11428. https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.11428