Challenges Facing Applicants for the Enhanced Social Security System: An Analytical Study Based on the David Gill Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.10821Keywords:
Challenges facing beneficiaries, enhanced social security system, social work, David Gil’s model.Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify the challenges faced by applicants seeking to benefit from the Enhanced Social Security System by assessing the system’s effectiveness in addressing these challenges, using David Gil’s model as an analytical framework.
Methodology: The study employed a qualitative approach, as it is categorized as qualitative research. In-depth interviews were used to gather data and insights. The research investigated common challenges encountered by applicants to the enhanced social security system. These challenges were then examined in relation to legal texts and executive regulations through the lens of systems theory and developmental theory. A detailed analysis was conducted based on the five components of David Gil’s model, which served as a tool to analyze the challenges. These components include societal issues linked to the system, the underlying goals and values, practical implementation aspects, and the influence of policy interactions.
Findings: The study revealed a total of 18 challenges faced by applicants. These challenges were categorized into three main groups based on the analysis. Some were fully addressed by the enhanced system such as eligibility for males under the age of 60 and the exclusion of individuals with commercial registrations. Others were only partially addressed, such as the eligibility threshold and enabling individuals capable of working. However, some challenges remained entirely unaddressed, notably the handling of beneficiaries’ loans.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that several obstacles continue to hinder applicants' access to social security benefits and limit the empowerment of individuals and families seeking support. This highlights the need to continuously review and address the challenges faced by beneficiary families, ensuring that system policies remain aligned with both local and global developments.
Downloads
References
Abu Zetun, N. A., & Abutayeh, A. M. (2024). The reality of working women in the informal sector in Jordanian society: A sociological study in southern Jordan. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 51(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i4.3859
Alhammadi, H. A. (2024). The effects of training, employment, and small business on empowering beneficiaries of social security. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 33(2).
Arthur van de Meerendonck, A., de Graaf, A., Schmidt-Benz, C., Kulke, U., & Hagmeijer, K. (2021). The impact of social security on poverty: A review of recent research (2nd ed.). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Cantillon, P. (2016). The impact of social security on poverty in rich welfare states: Gaps in the post-war policy model, future prospects 1. Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp; United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Frankel, K., Kropf, N., & Greene, R. R. (2017). A systems approach: Addressing diverse family forms. In Human behavior theory (pp. 173–206). Routledge.
Gil, D. G. (1992). Unravelling social policy. Rochester, NY: Schenkman Books.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
Hamza, A. I. (2015). Social planning (1st ed.). Amman, Jordan: Dar Almasirah for Publishing and Distribution.
Joudah, A. (2002). Focus group method and its uses in social research. Faculty of Arts Journal, Ain Shams University, Cairo.
Kunnen, E. S., De Ruiter, N. M., Jeronimus, B. F., & Van der Gaag, M. A. (Eds.). (2019). Psychosocial development in adolescence: Insights from the dynamic systems approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.112.483.211
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K. H., & Broman, G. (2017). A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: Exploring the social system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170
Morris, D. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world's poor: The physical quality of life index. New York, NY: Pergamon Press. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000037164
Paramjit Singh Jamir Singh, & Azlinda Azman. (2022). System theory and ecological approach in social work practice: An actual case illustration. Asian Social Work Journal, 7(6), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.47405/aswj.v7i6.232
Streeten, P. (1979). The dynamics of the new poor power in a world divided: The less developed countries in the international economy. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/Streeten-1981-First.pdf
Turner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017). Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
