Spatial Variation in Fertility Levels Among Saudi Women in the Riyadh Region and Their Influencing Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.10940Keywords:
Fertility, age at first marriage, place of birth, family planning methods.Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify the spatial variation in fertility levels, reveal the impact of fertility on age structure, and determine the most significant factors influencing fertility among Saudi women in the administrative governorates of the Riyadh region.
Methodology: The study adopted both inductive and deductive approaches, relying on statistical methods for analysis and interpretation. The sample consisted of 745 women who were either currently married or had previously been married.
Results: The findings indicated spatial variation in fertility rates across the governorates of the Riyadh region. Fertility rates were higher—reaching three children per woman—in Al-Hariq, Al-Muzahimiyah, As-Sulayyil, Wadi ad-Dawasir, Ar-Rayn, Al-Kharj, Al-Aflaj, and Hawtat Bani Tamim. Rates were lower in the Emirate’s headquarters, Thadiq, Shaqra, and Marat. The main determinants of reproductive behavior among women in Riyadh city, based on the sample, were age at first marriage, marital duration, educational level, infant mortality, use of family planning methods, place of birth, and geographic region. The findings also showed a decline in the youth population and an increase in the average age in the Riyadh region.
Conclusion: It is important to consider variables such as age at first marriage, education, employment status, and child mortality in development plans and population policies. Further studies on reproductive health and behavior are recommended in light of fertility changes, through targeted surveys on women’s health in Saudi Arabia.
Downloads
References
Adhikari, R. (2010), Demographic, socio-economic, and cultural factor affecting fertility differentials in Nepal, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 4(10), 10 – 19.
Anderson et al., (1985) , Fertility Trend and Determinants in Jordan. International Family Planning Perspectives, 11(2), 47-51.
Baschieri, A, & Hinde, A. (2007), The Proximate Determinants of Fertility and Birth Intervals in Egypt: An application of calendar data, Demographic Research, 16(3) 59-96.
Bongaarts, J. (1978), A Framework for Analyzing the proximate Determinants of Fertility. Population and Development, 41 (1), 105-132.
Bongaarts, J. (2006), The Causes of Stalling Fertility Transitions. Studies in family Planning, 37(1), 1-16.
Caldwell, J. (1982). Theory of Fertility Decline. London: Academic Press.
Davis, K. & Blake, J. (1956), Social structure and fertility: An analytic framework, Economic and Cultural Change, 4(4), 211-235. doi:10.1086/449714.
Hailat, M. (2016), Socioeconomic status, Marriage Patterns, and Fertility Choices in Jordan. Jordan of economic Sciences journal, 3(1), 45-63.
Kanwal, N., Muttappallymyalil, J., Al-Sharbatti, S., & Ismail, I. (2017). Contraceptive utilisation among mothers of reproductive age in Ajman, United Arab Emirates. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 17(1), e50.
Malthus, T. (1798) , An Essay on the Principle of Population, London: Johnson.
Notestein, F. (1945), Population the long View, In Theodore W. Schultz, Ed., Food for the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pavlou, V. (1987) , Differential Fertility in Cyprus: A Microanalysis, NY: Wayne State University.
Thompson, W. (1929) , Population. American Journal of Sociology, 34(6), 959-975.
Sunil, T. S., & Pillai, V. K. (2004). Age at marriage, contraceptive use and abortion in Yemen, 1991-1997. Canadian Studies in Population [ARCHIVES], 83-107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

