Assessing the Teaching Performance of Faculty Members in University Media Programs and Its Impact on the Quality of Higher Education Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.11756Keywords:
Evaluation, Assessment, Teaching Performance, Faculty Members, Quality, Higher Education Outcomes.Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the teaching performance of faculty members in media programs at Arab universities and to analyze its impact on the quality of higher education outcomes. It sought to clarify the importance of performance evaluation, examine the relationship between teaching quality and output quality, explore current evaluation standards, and assess faculty members’ satisfaction with and benefit from evaluation results.
Methods: A descriptive-analytical approach and a social survey method were used. Data were collected via a questionnaire administered to a purposive sample of faculty members at selected Arab universities, aiming to explore the current state of evaluation and analyze its implications.
Results: Findings indicated that most educational institutions have evaluation policies and manuals but suffer from weak communication and lack effective mechanisms to uphold academic standards. Evaluation processes often rely on traditional tools, with limited attention to methods suited to the applied nature of media disciplines. Faculty members expressed mixed views on the objectivity and fairness of the evaluation tools, and the results were weakly linked to promotion or incentive systems.
Conclusions: The study revealed issues such as insufficient specialization in evaluation criteria, low confidence in evaluation mechanisms, and a lack of continuous follow-up. It recommended the periodic review and development of evaluation tools and standards, ensuring alignment with the particularities of media studies and the needs of the labor market.
Downloads
References
Adade, C. Q. (2019). Symbolic interactionism: The basics (1st ed.). Vernon Press.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
Freeze, M. (2021). Mary Baumgartner, Peter Bruno, Jacob R. Gunderson, Joshua Olin, Morgan Quinn Ross: Fake claims of fake news, political misinformation warnings, and the tainted truth effect. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09597-3
Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2014). The changing faculty and student success: National trends and the faculty role. USC Pullias Center for Higher Education. https://pullias.usc.edu/downloads/changing-faculty-and-student-success
Mechti, L. (2023). Evaluating the teaching performance of faculty members from the students' point of view. Afak Ilmia Journal, 15, 679–700.
Shaath, S., & Abed, T. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of faculty teachers’ performance at Birzeit University as perceived by students. Tertiary Education and Management, 30, 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-024-09148-z
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
UNESCO. (1998). World declaration on higher education for the twenty-first century: Vision and action. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141952
UNESCO. (2009). Global standards and guidelines for quality assurance in higher education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
Unknown author. (2023). Performance Measurement Model. Journal of Education, Faculty of Education, Al-Azhar University, 199, 601–637. https://doi.org/10.21608/jsrep.2023.316071
Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J. A. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2010). The art of writing a scientific article. Journal of Scientific Communications, 163, 51–59.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

