Electronic Signatures and Their Evidentiary Value: A Comparative Study between Jordanian Legislation, the UNCITRAL Model, and European Regulations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/Law.2026.13604

Keywords:

Digital Signature, Electronic Transactions, Electronic Evidence, Jordanian Electronic Transactions Law, eIDAS Regulation

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the regulation and use of digital signatures in Jordan and evaluates the adequacy of the legal, institutional, and technical framework. It also compares Jordanian legislation with UNCITRAL models and the European eIDAS Regulation to identify strengths and gaps.

Methods: A descriptive approach was used to analyze legal texts, alongside a comparative approach with international models. The study draws on Jordanian laws, judicial decisions, official reports, prior studies, and a case study of the Ministry of Justice’s “Sanad” system.

Results: The study finds that Jordan has established a legal framework for digital signatures; however, it suffers from ambiguity in certain definitions and limitations in recognizing the legal validity of electronic evidence, along with weaknesses in institutional controls and technical infrastructure. The comparison with the eIDAS Regulation reveals differences in the recognition of qualified signatures, the accreditation mechanisms for trust service providers, and cross-border recognition procedures. The “Sanad” experience is considered a positive step, yet it still requires further legislative, technical, and awareness enhancements.

Conclusion: The study recommends updating Jordanian legislation to adopt clearer definitions and accreditation mechanisms for qualified signatures, strengthening the security infrastructure (PKI), establishing a supervisory framework for trust service providers, and implementing training and awareness programs for judges, lawyers, and government entities to enhance trust in electronic transactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albnian, A., Al-Hammouri, A., Al-Billeh, T., Al Makhmari, M., Belghit, R., & Himmich, M. (2025). The legal effect of electronic bonds lacking an authenticated signature in Jordanian legislation. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.26555/jhn.v16i1.29437

Al-Masadeh, A. M., Abunaseir, M. H., & Abu Rukba, R. O. (2024). Impact of Jordanian electronic transactions law and digital transformation on commercial contracts and their proof. Journal of Human Security, 20(1), 104–108.

Boehme-Nebler, V. (2008). Cyberlaw: The law of the Internet and information technology. Springer.

Daoud, H. A. Y., & Al-B’ool, S. M. M. (2026). Proof by digital signature in smart contracts using blockchain technology: A comparative study between Islamic jurisprudence, the Jordanian electronic transactions law, and the evidence law. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 53(1), 110021.

Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. E. (1976). New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22(6), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1976.1055638

European Union. (2014). Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (eIDAS). European Union.

Hammerli, J., & Camenisch, J. (2018). Advanced digital signature schemes. Springer.

Kask, L. (2024). Time of signing: Legal requirements and technical options for hand-written and electronic signatures. Juridica International. https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2024.33.05

Kuner, C. (2012). European data protection law: Corporate compliance and regulation. Oxford University Press.

Mason, S. (2010). Digital signatures and electronic contracts. TechLaw Publishers.

Stallings, W. (2017). Cryptography and network security: Principles and practice (7th ed.). Pearson.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2001). UNCITRAL model law on electronic commerce. United Nations.

Wardana, I. W. D. P., Dharmawan, N. K. S., & Astariyani, N. L. G. (2023). Legality for electronic signatures in implementing electronic medical records. Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmmr.v12i3.96

Zoho Sign. (2025). Electronic signature solutions. Zoho Corporation.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

Issue

Section

Law

How to Cite

ALMATHHAN, M. O. J. (2026). Electronic Signatures and Their Evidentiary Value: A Comparative Study between Jordanian Legislation, the UNCITRAL Model, and European Regulations. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 54(1), 13604. https://doi.org/10.35516/Law.2026.13604