Durra Gas Field Crisis of 2023 in Light of The Rules of International Law

Nada  Al-Duaij

doi:10.35516/law.v52i4.11190

Authors

Nada Al-Duaij Department of International Law, School of Law, Kuwait University, Al-Showaikh, Kuwait. https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8482-4307

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v52i4.11190

Keywords:

Durra, gas, economic, negotiations, agreements, seas, regional.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to highlight the dangers posed by the territorial dispute over the gas field between Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. It focuses on peaceful methods to resolve such conflicts and clarifies the reasons fueling these disputes, particularly the reliance on national legislation to define territorial waters and economic zones, without considering international law principles regarding the rights of adjacent states.

Methods: This study adopts the historical approach to explore the relationship between Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Iran regarding the gas field claims. It also employs a comparative approach to analyze similar international disputes and a descriptive approach to assess the gas field's ownership under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Results: The study finds that the Dorra gas field is rightfully Kuwait's, without shared rights with any other regional state, and highlights Kuwait's right to partner with Saudi Arabia. Key findings include the need to pursue peaceful dispute resolution methods and the importance of avoiding armed conflict whenever possible.

Conclusion: The study concludes that the Dorra gas field is located in Kuwait's exclusive economic zone. Iran's national legislation, which defines its economic zone and territorial sea, contradicts international law and aims to claim the Dorra field under its sovereignty. Kuwait's agreement with Saudi Arabia to jointly exploit the field is a legitimate right. Iranian objections have a defined path for peaceful resolution and should not escalate to armed conflict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel Fattah, A. (2023). Al-Durra field and the expected clash between Kuwait and Iran. Political Horizons Magazine of the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies, 125, 42–43.

Abu Asba, N., & Mohammed, M. (2007). The strategic importance of oil in the global economy with special reference to Arab countries: A case study – the Libyan economy model. Unpublished PhD thesis, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

Al-Amin, A. (2013). International negotiations. Scientific Journal of Imam Mahdi University, (2), 233–267.

Al-Anani, I. (1975). The exclusive maritime economic zone. The Egyptian Journal of International Law, 31, 169–237.

Al-Anzi, A. (2019). Attack on Saudi diplomatic and consular premises in Tehran and Mashhad 2016 in light of the rulings of the International Court of Justice. Journal of Law, 34(2), 15–69.

Al-Anzi, A., et al. (2023). Concise public international law (Sources - Persons - Immunities - Responsibility) (1st ed.). Kuwait: Dar Al-Kutub Foundation.

Al-Bili, S. (2003). The exclusive economic zone. Justice Magazine, 5(9), 253–254.

Al-Deeb, M. (1990). Defining the exclusive economic zone in international law. Journal of Diplomatic Studies, (6), 52–63.

Al-Fatlawi, P., & Imran, H. (2009). The process of demarcating international borders and the disputes arising therefrom. Journal of the University of Babylon, Humanities, 17(1), 33–45.

Al-Mutairi, M., & Baydoun, M. (2014). Settlement of continental shelf disputes in light of the principle of sovereignty in public international law: A comparative study (Kuwait, Iraq, Iran) (Unpublished master's thesis). Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan.

Al-Rai Kuwaiti Electronic Newspaper. (2023). Repeated Iranian attempts since the sixties of the last century to impose a fait accompli with no base: Al-Durra, the story of the marine field from A to Z. Retrieved from www.alraimedia.com/article/1647178.

Al-Rashidi, M. (1999). The impact of islands on the failure to define maritime borders between some GCC countries and Iran. In Symposium on New Horizons for Relations between the GCC Countries and Iran – International and Regional Developments and Requirements for Change (Vol. 1). Kuwait: University of Kuwait, Center for Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Studies.

Al-Shafei, N. (2011). Crude oil in the countries of the Arabian Gulf region between export and manufacturing: A geographical analysis. Journal of Humanities, (20), 154–193.

Al-Shahri, N. (2018). National sovereignty is a fundamental pillar of state building and a real guarantee of its rights and duties. Diplomatic Journal, (91), 14–17.

Amer, P. (1989). The new international law of the sea: A study of the most important provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Cairo: Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya.

Helmy, A. (1978). Continental extension and modern rules of international law of the sea. Cairo: Dar Al-Nahda.

Jacob, D., & Radi, Y. (2011). Waiting for Godot: An analysis of the advisory opinion on Kosovo. Leiden Journal of International Law, 24(2), 331–353.

Jash, A., & Moonakal, N. A. (2023). China as an international mediator in the context of Saudi-Iran relations. Orient, 64(4), 46–52.

Kozhanov, N. A. (2020). Iran and the GCC countries: Between confrontation and dialogue. World Economy and International Relations, 64(7), 80–88.

Mustafa, M. (1967). The economic importance of Middle East oil. Studies in Economics and Trade, 3(1), 37–58.

Sharifa, A. (2023, August 10). The advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice... A winning card for Kuwait in the maritime dispute with Iran. Gulf State.

Swiss Info Channel. (2023). Iranian foreign minister invites his Kuwaiti counterpart to visit his country amid tension over the Dorra field. Retrieved from www.swissinfo.ch.

Taleb, A. (n.d.). Crisis management: Chapter one – Theoretical foundations of general crisis management. Notes for the College of Administration and Economics, University of Babylon.