Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies by Non-Arabic Speaking Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v49i2.1019Keywords:
reading skills, metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, non-Arabic speakers.Abstract
Objectives: The present study aims to reveal the degree of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies by non-Arabic speaking learners. Data from a random sample of (81) non-Arabic speaking male and female learners majoring in Arabic Language and Literature at Yarmouk University was collected.
Methods: To achieve the objectives of the study, a descriptive analytical approach was applied. The scale of Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) was used. The scale consisted of (15) items distributed to three areas: Global Reading Strategies (GRS), Problem Solving Strategies (PSS), and Supportive Reading Strategies (SRS).
Results: The outcomes of the study revealed that the degree of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of non-Arabic speaking learners is moderate in all items on the scale.
Conclusions: The study recommends the importance for teachers of Arabic of non-native speakers to develop learners' awareness of the importance of these strategies and use them in language learning.
Downloads
References
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P.D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373.
Alhaqbani, A., & Riazi, M. (2012). Matacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Arabic as a second language. Reading in Foreign Language, 24(2), 231-255.
Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2018). EFL Learner Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 297-308.
Anderson, C., Hiebert, H., Scott, A., & Wilkinson, G. (1985). Becoming a Nation of Reader: The Report of the Commission Reading. United States: National Academy of Education.
Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, Conceptual, Methodological, and Instructional Issues in Research on Metacognition and Self-regulated Learning: A Discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87-95.
Borkowski, J. G. (1985). Signs of Intelligence: Strategy Generalization and Metacognition in Cognition. In The Growth of Reflection in Children. Orlando: Academic Press.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Demirel’e, Ö. (2003). Türkçe Öğretimi. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
Ditzel, S. N. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45-63.
Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognition Development. In Structural Process Theories of Complex Human Behavior. Alphenaan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.
Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Fry, R. (1997). Improve your Reading. London: The Career press.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognitive and Reading Comprehension. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing company.
Goodman, K. S. (1994). Reading, writing and written texts: A transactional sociopsycholinguistic view, In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Grant, R. (1994). Comprehension Strategy Instruction; Basic Considerations For Instructiong At Risk College Students. Journal of Reading, 38(1). 142-149.
Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: Pedagogical implications for EFL/ ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 150-157.
Kocaman, O., & Beşkardeşler, S. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Use by English Language Teaching Students in Turkish Context: Sakarya University Sample. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(2), 254-269.
Mokhtari, k., Dimitrov, D.M., & Reichard, C.A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219-246.
Nisbet, D., & Huang, J. (2015). Reading strategy use and reading proficiency of EFL students in Chana. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(3),202-212
Nisbet, J., & Shucksmith, J. (1986). Learning strategies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Okeke, N. E. (2000). Effects of exposure to in text vocabulary recognition strategies on secondary school students’ performance on reading comprehension in Awka education Zone. Nsukka: University of Nigeria.
Owusu-Acheaw, M. (2014). Reading Habits Among Students and its Effect on Academic Performance: A Study of Students of Koforidua Polytechnic. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1130
Oxford, R. L., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 1-47.
Pammua, A., Amir, Z., & Mohd, T. N. (2014). Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Less Proficient Tertiary Learners: A Case Study of EFL Learners at a Public University in Makassar, Indonesia. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 357-364.
Pardede, P. (2008). A Review on Reading Theories and its Implication to the Teaching of Reading. Indonesia: Universitas Kristen.
Phakiti, A. (2003). A close look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive a chievement test performance. Language Testing Journal, 20(1), 26-56.
Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of metacognitive Knowledge in learning teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
Ridway, T. (1994). Reading Theory and Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. Reading in Foreign Language, 10(2), 55-83.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Cotemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Steinbach, J. C. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on writing. Lexingtin.
Tunca, N., & Alkın-Şahin, S. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının bilişötesi (ÜstBiliş) öğrenme stratejileri ile akademik özyeterlik inançları arasındaki ilişki. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 4(1), 47-56.
Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive Knowledge and Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537.
Zimmerman, B. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulation academic learning. Journal of Education Psychology, 81, 329-339.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.