The Effect of a Strategy Based on Mathematical Modeling among 10th Grade Students with Different Cognitive Styles in Mathematical Problem Solving

Authors

  • Adnan Al Abed Department of Curriculum and Instruction, School of Educational Sciences, University of Jordan, Jordan
  • Abdullah Al Khamaysah Ministry of Education, Jordan https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0601-4323

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v50i2%20-S1.1435

Keywords:

Mathematical modeling, mathematical problem solving, cognitive styles, grade 10

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the impact of a mathematical modeling strategy on 10th grade students' problem-solving abilities, considering different cognitive styles.

Methods: The experimental method and quasi-experimental design were employed. Two schools in Amman, Jordan, participated, with random assignment of two classes per school: one as the experimental group taught using the mathematical modeling strategy and the other as the control group taught using the traditional method. The sample consisted of 50 students (male and female) in the experimental group and 52 students (male and female) in the control group.

Results: The teaching materials, mathematical problem-solving test, and cognitive style test were prepared. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences (α = 0.05) in problem-solving abilities between the experimental and control groups, favoring the mathematical modeling strategy. However, no significant differences (α = 0.05) were found in problem-solving abilities based on the interaction between the teaching method and cognitive style.

Conclusions: These findings suggest the importance of encouraging mathematics teachers to adopt the mathematical modeling strategy and providing training on building teaching strategies based on mathematical modeling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allinson, C. (2012). The Cognitive Style Index. Pearson Education. Ltd,UK.

Ang, K. C. (2001). Teaching mathematical modelling in Singapore schools. The Mathematics Educator, 6(1), 63-75.

Bambang, S. R. M., Salasi, R., & Usman, U. (2021, April). Students' mental activities and cognitive styles in mathematical problem-solving. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2331, No. 1). AIP Publishing.‏ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041925 .

Bhagat, A., Vyas, R., & Singh, T. (2015). Students Awareness of Learning Style and their Perceptions to a Mixed Method Approach for Learning. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 5(4), 58.

Blum, W., & Leiβ, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, y S. Khan. Mathematical Modelling: Education, Engineering and Economics, 222-231.‏

Bruun, F. (2013). Elementary Teachers Perspectives of Mathematics Problem Solving Strategies. Mathematics Educator, 1(23), 45-59.

Chapman, O. (2005). Constructing Pedagogical Knowledge of Problem Solving: Preservice Mathematics Teachers. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 225-232.‏

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Glicksohn, J., & Kinberg, Z. (2009). Performance on embedded figures tests: Profiling individual differences. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.3.152.

Gould, H. (2013). Teachers' Conceptions of Mathematical Modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University.

Hansson, A. (2010). International Responsibility in Mathematical Education Modelling Classroom Teaching Using Swedish Data. Education Stud Math, 75, 171-189.

Connell Jr, J. E. (2005). Constructing a Math Applications, Curriculum-Based Assessment: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Application Problems, Computation Problems and Criterion-Referenced Assessments (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College).‏

Kahn, P., & Kyle, J. (2002). Effective Learning & Teaching in Mathematics and its applications. Journal Math Teacher Education, 5(7), 220-245.

Klang, N., Karlsson, N., Kilborn, W., Eriksson, P., & Karlberg, M. (2021, August). Mathematical problem-solving through cooperative learning—the importance of peer acceptance and friendships. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 710296). Frontiers.‏ https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.710296.

Kurniada, E., & Partiwi, D. (2020). Developing a learning design of mathematical modeling courses on understanding basic concept of mathematical modeling. Journal of physics, Conf. series, 1480.

Li, Z., & Li, B. (2021). Measuring Thinking Styles of Pre-Service and Early Career Teachers: Validation of a Revised Inventory. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(3), 421-432.

Matson, K. (2018). Teachers' Perspectives on How They Learn Mathematical Modeling (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University).‏

Mumma, G. H. (1993). The Embedded Figures Test: Internal structure and development of a short form. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(2), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90029-3.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Pollak, H. (2012). The interaction between mathematics and other new trend in mathematics teaching. United Nation Educational, 4(7), 232-248.

Riding, R., & Watts, M. (1998). The effects of cognitive style on the preferred format of instructional material. Educational Psychology, 17, 179-183.

SAT Math Problem Solving. (2022). SAT Math Problem Solving: Practice tests and explanations. https://www.majortests.com/sat/problem-solving.php.

Schwerdtfeger, S. (2017). Elementary Preservice Teachers' and Elementary Inservice Teachers' Knowledge of Mathematical Modeling. Kansas State University.‏

Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and Intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.5.325.

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East-UNRWA. (2012). School Based Teacher Development (SBTD): Transforming Classroom Practices, UNRWA.

Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1975.tb01065.x.

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (2002). Group embedded figures test manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Wolf, N. (2015). Modeling with Mathematics: Authentic problem solving in middle school. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Published

2023-08-30

How to Cite

Al Abed, A. . ., & Al Khamaysah, A. . (2023). The Effect of a Strategy Based on Mathematical Modeling among 10th Grade Students with Different Cognitive Styles in Mathematical Problem Solving . Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 50(2 -S1), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v50i2 -S1.1435
Received 2022-06-15
Accepted 2022-07-27
Published 2023-08-30