Analysis of the Content of High School Biology Textbooks in Jordan in Terms of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)

Authors

  • Abduallah Salem Alzoubi Faculty of Educational Sciences, The World Islamic sciences & Education University, Jordan

Keywords:

Biology content analysis, next generation of science standards (NGSS), high school in Jordan

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the content of biology textbooks for secondary grades in Jordan and to investigate the proportions of the next generation science standards (NGSS). In order to achieve this, the study applied an analytical descriptive approach in analyzing the content of biology books for secondary grades in the academic year (2017-2018). The researcher prepared a questionnaire which included the criteria of science for future generations as categories of analysis, and verified its validity and stability. The results showed that the scope of cognitive content in the books of biology of secondary stage is not sufficiently consistent with science standards for future generations, There are gaps in the coverage of some areas, such as the areas of matter and energy, size, proportion and quantity, the construction of explanations in science, the design of solutions in engineering, and the use of mathematical thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Ahmad, N., & Baqme, M. (2017). Analysis of the content of physics books in Saudi Arabia in the light of NGSS science standards. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 13 (3), 309-326.

Hassania, G. (2013). Assessment of the physics book for the ninth grade in Jordan in the light of the international content standards for scientific education. Al-Manara Journal, 19 (3), 173--211.

Zoubi, A. (2016). The effect of using dialectic issues in teaching English on the achievement of ninth grade students. Dirasat, Educational Sciences, 43 (2), 427-436.

Zaiton, A. (2010). Contemporary Global Trends in Science Curriculum and Teaching. Amman: Al-Shorouk Publishing and Distribution.

Ghanem, T. (2016). Future trends in the imaging of biological science curricula in the light of American experience. In The Eighteenth Conference of the Egyptian Association for Scientific Education - Egypt's Curriculum between the Egyptian and International, 24-25 July

Jordanian Ministry of Education (2010). Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Education 2009-2012. Retrieved 8/11/2017 from: http://www.moe.gov.jo/Files/

Jordanian Ministry of Education (2015). Recommendations of the Educational Development Conference. Retrieved 8/11/2017 from: http://www.moe.gov.jo/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsID=2682

Brandt, R. (2000). Education in a New Era. U.S.A.: Assn for Supervision & Curriculum.

Bybee, R. (2012). The next generation of science standards: Implications for biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 74 (8), 542–549.

Duschl, R. (2012). The second dimension—crosscutting concepts: Understanding a framework for K–12 science education. The Science Teacher, 79, 34–38.

Fanning, L., & Adams, K. (2015). Bridging the three dimensions of the NGSS using the nature of science. Science, 39 (2), 66 - 73.

Lontok K., Zhang, H., & Dougherty, M. (2015). Assessing the Content in the Next Generation Science Standards. PLoS ONE, 10(7). Retrieved 13 Nov 2017 from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.

Nagle, B. (2013). Preparing High School Students for the Interdisciplinary Nature of Modern Biology. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 12 (2), 144-147.

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. High school Life Science. Retrieved 14 Nov 2017 from: https://ngss.nsta.org/accessstandardsbytopic.aspx

National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved 17 Nov 2017 from: https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.

National Research Council. 2014. Capturing Change in Science, Technology, and Innovation: Improving Indicators to Inform Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved 17 Nov 2017 from: https://doi.org/10.17226/18606

Radick, G. (2016). Teach students the biology of their time. Nature, 533(7603), 291.

Vasaly, H., Feser, J., Lettrich, M., Correa, K., & Denniston, K. (2014). Vision and Change in the Biology Community: Snapshots of Change. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 16-20.

Published

2020-06-01

How to Cite

Alzoubi, A. S. . (2020). Analysis of the Content of High School Biology Textbooks in Jordan in Terms of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 47(2), 428–437. Retrieved from http://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/2302

Issue

Section

Articles