Interrogation of Silent Features, Creative Reasoning and Function Sense for Graphing Functions

Authors

  • Muad M. Shiyyab Faculty of Education, Yarmouk University, Jordan

Keywords:

Graphing functions, creative method for graphing, Arithmetic silent features, asymptotic silent feature of functions

Abstract

Graphs and Graphing function are crucial aspects of understanding, yet this is troublesome to students.  This research paper offers a quite distinct way of thinking to help ease such difficulty.  It focuses on analyzing, connecting silent features of functions with the improvement of graphing skills and concepts of concavities, and increasing and decreasing phenomena.  Two methods were explored, examined and discussed, namely arithmetic silent feature and reasoning, and asymptotic silent feature and reasoning.  Data collected through interviews and observation were qualitatively analyzed.  The impact of learning such methods on enhancing graphing skills and on understanding concavity was remarkable.  Students enthusiastic involvement, and use of basic skills and previous knowledge helped them in the process of assimilating and accommodating concepts that were previously procedurally learned. So, their graphing skills were significantly enhanced. Based on the study results, the researcher recommends that such methods be part of teacher’s specialized pedagogical content knowledge the teacher could take into consideration and add to his/her repertoire for effective teaching and better outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson R., et al., (1994). Issues of Curriculum Reform In Science, Mathematics, and Higher Order Thinking Across The Disciplines. U.S.A. U.S Government Printing Office.

Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., et al.(2014). APOS Theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in Mathematics Education. New York: Springer Science + Business media.

Ben-Hur, M., (2006). Concept Rich Instruction: Building a Strong Foundation for Reasoning and Problem Solving. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. VA. USA.

Glazer, E. (2001). Using Internet Primary Sources to Teach Critical Thinking Skills In Mathematics. London, GREENWOOD PRESS.

Hirst, P.H. and White, P. (2001). (eds.) Philosophy of Education: Major Themes in the analytic tradition volume1, Philosophy and Education. New York: Routledge in Taylor & Francis e-library.

Kelly, V. A., (2009). The curriculum theory and practice. Oliver's Yard, London, Sage.

Lester, F. K., and Charles, R. (2003). Teaching Mathematics Through Problem Solving: Pre-K- Grade 6. Reston, VA. National Council of Teachers of mathematics.

McGregor, D., (2007). Developing Thinking Developing Learning. Berkshire, England. Open University Press.

Pritchard, A., (2009). Ways of Learning: Learning Theories and Learning Styles in the classroom. New York. Routledge.

Resnick, B., L., (1989).Knowing Learning and instruction. New Jersy, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Schoen, H., and Charles, R. (Eds.)(2003). Teaching mathematics through Problem Solving: Grades 6-12. Reston, VA. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Sierpinska, A., (1994). Understanding in Mathematics. London, The Falmer Press.

Sriraman, B., and English, L., (2010). Theories of Mathematics education. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Springer.

Swan, M., (2001). Dealing with misconceptions. In Gates, P. (Ed.), Issues in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 147 – 165). NY. Routledge Falmer.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-01

How to Cite

Shiyyab , M. M. . (2020). Interrogation of Silent Features, Creative Reasoning and Function Sense for Graphing Functions. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 47(4), 498–509. Retrieved from http://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/2521

Issue

Section

Articles