The Degree of Availability of Six Sigma Application Requirements at Taif University from the Point of View of Faculty Members

Authors

  • Mansour Maqableh College of Education, Taif University, Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

Six Sigma, Taif University, faculty members

Abstract

The study aims to identify the degree of availability of the requirements for the application of Six Sigma at Taif University from the point of view of the faculty members. To achieve the objectives of the study, the descriptive survey method was used. The study tool consisted of (42) items distributed over five domains applied to a sample of (225) faculty members. The results of the study showed that the degree of availability of the requirements for the application of Six Sigma at Taif University from the point of view of faculty members was moderate.  Further, the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences at the significance level (α = 0.05) due to the effect of gender and academic rank, and there were statistically significant differences at (α = 0.05) due to the effect of the college, and the differences came in favor of the humanities colleges, and there were statistically significant differences at (α = 0.05) due to the effect of experience among those with more than (10) years of experience and less than (5) years, the differences came in favor of those with more than (10) years of experience. Considering the results of the study, the researcher recommends the necessity of disseminating the concept of Six Sigma and the organizational culture among university employees, working to provide qualified trainers and experts, and holding courses for faculty members in the field of Six Sigma.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, N. C., & Kovach, J. V. (2014). Reducing welding defects in turnaround projects: A lean six sigma case study. Quality Engineering, 26(2), 168-181.

Antony, J. (2014). Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

Antony, J., & Banuelas, R. (2002). Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program. Measuring business excellence.

Cho, J. H., Lee, J. H., Ahn, D. G., & Jang, J. S. (2011). Selection of Six Sigma key ingredients (KIs) in Korean companies. The TQM Journal.

Davis, M., & Fifolt, M. (2018). Exploring employee perceptions of Six Sigma as a change management program in higher education. Journal of higher education policy and management, 40(1), 81-93.

Gastelum-Acosta, C., Limon-Romero, J., Maciel-Monteon, M., & Baez-Lopez, Y. (2018). Six Sigma in Higher Education Institutions in Mexico. Seis Sigma en Institucione, 29(5), 10-91.

Leon, H. C. M., & Crimi, M. (2019). Assessing the Impact of University-Industry collaborative Lean Six Sigma Capstone Projects on Engineering Management Students. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Vijaya, S. (2016). Lean Six Sigma in higher education institutions. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, (8)2, 159-178.

Al-Dehani, S., & Alansari, S. (2016). The impact of applying the Sigma six methodology and internal audit standards at Kuwait University on the quality of internal audits. DIRASAT: EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 45(2). Retrieved from https://archives.ju.edu.jo/index.php/edu/article/view/12530.

Al-Otaibi, A. (2016). Requirements for applying Sigma Six Sigma SIX according to the Demac DMAIC model at Shaqra University from the point of view of its leadership. DIRASAT: EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 44, 277-297.

Published

2021-09-01

How to Cite

Maqableh, M. . (2021). The Degree of Availability of Six Sigma Application Requirements at Taif University from the Point of View of Faculty Members. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 48(3), 122–136. Retrieved from http://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/2862

Issue

Section

Articles