Psychometric Properties of Jordanian Version of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale -Third Edition Based on DSM-5

Authors

  • Salah Aldeen Mohammad College of Educational Sciences, Mutah University, Jordan

Keywords:

Autism spectrum disorder, psychometric properties, validity, reliability, Gilliam autism rating scale

Abstract

The current study aims to examine the validity and reliability of Arabic Jordanian Version of Gilliam Autism Rating Scale -Third Edition. The sample consisted of (150) children aged between (3-17) years. Thus, they were divided into (50) autism, (50) mental retardation, and (50) normal. The scale was translated to Arabic language. The validity of the scale was verified by arbitrators and a concurrent validity of the scale through finding its correlation coefficients with Jordanian Version of Autistic Behavior Checklist (ABC). The reliability was calculated by using the internal consistency. The internal consistency of the scale was verified via finding the reliability coefficients for the scale dimensions and the scale as a whole, by using the Cornbrash's alpha equation and the test-retest method. Also, the reliability was calculated by correlating the item with a dimension which belongs, by using the correlation coefficient. The results of the study indicated that the scale is characterized by high and good validity and reliability indicators in the Jordanian environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Jabery, M.(2008).Theexamination of validity and reliability indicators of the Jordanian translated Arabicversion of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS-2), Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Michigan.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition: DSM-5 (Fifth Edit). American Psychiatric Association DSM.

Davis, A. S. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of pediatric neuropsychology. Springer Publishing Company.

Diken, I.H., Ardic, A., Diken,O., & Gilliam, J.E. (2012). Exploring validity and reliability of Turkish Version of Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-2. Education and Science, 37(166), 318-328.

Gilliam, J.E. (2013). Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS-3). Austin,TX: Pro-Ed.

Klose, L., Plotts, C., Kozeneski, N., & Foster, A. (2011). A Review of Assessment Tools for Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Implications for School Practice. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37(2), 67-69.

Krug, D., Arick, J., & Almond, P. (2008). AutismBehaviorChecklist–ABC. In Autism Screening Instrument for Educational Planning-ASIEP-2. Austin, Texas:PRO-ED.

Norris, M., & Lecavalier, L. (2010). Screening accuracy of level 2 autism spectrum disorder rating scales: A review of selected instruments. Autism, 14(4), 263-284.

Smadi, J. M. (1985). A validation study of a Jordanian version of the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) of the Autism Screening Instrument for Educational Planning (ASIEP). Michigan State University.

Schreibman, L. (2005). The science and fiction of autism. Harvard University Press.

Tafiadis, D., Loli, G., Tsanousa, E., & Tafiadi, M. (2008). The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS-2), a pilot study for the Greek autistic population. Annals of General Psychiatry, 7(1), 1-1.

Published

2021-09-01

How to Cite

Mohammad, S. A. . . (2021). Psychometric Properties of Jordanian Version of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale -Third Edition Based on DSM-5. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 48(3), 355–572. Retrieved from http://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/2880

Issue

Section

Articles