Designing a Training Program Based on the Connectivism Theory to Measure its Impact on Developing the Computational Thinking Skills

Authors

  • Wael Seitan School of Educational Sciences, The University of Jordan, Jordan
  • Abdelmuhdi Aljarrah School of Educational Sciences, The University of Jordan, Jordan

Keywords:

Training Programs, Connectivism Theory, Computational Thinking Skills

Abstract

This research aims at designing and implementing a training program based on the Connectivism Theory and measuring its impact on developing their computational thinking skills of the secondary students’. The quasi-experimental approach was followed, where the sample of the research members consisted of (60) students, randomly distributed into two groups: the experimental group of (30) students and the control group of (30) students. The sample was collected from one of the private schools in Amman, during the first semester of the 2019-2020 academic year. To achieve the goal of the research, the researchers designed and applied the training program based on the Connectivism Theory to the experimental group while the control group studied using the traditional learning method. A computational thinking skills test, which tests decomposition skill, pattern recognition skill, abstraction skill, and skill of designing algorithms, was prepared. The results of the research indicated that there are statistically significant differences in the development of all computational thinking skills, in favor of the members of the experimental group, as a result of implementing the training program based on the Connectivism Theory. In the light of the results of the research and discussion, the researchers recommended that computational thinking skills should be included in all subjects for all classes, as well as a set of recommendations with relevance to the subject of the research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artino, R., & Stephen, J. (2007). Using Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Students' Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Online Courses.

Chen G., Shen J., Barth-Cohen L., Jiang S., Huang X., & Eltoukhy M. (2017). Assessing Elementary Students’ Computational Thinking in Everyday Reasoning and Robotics Programming. Computers & Education, (109), 162-175.

Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA). (2017). K-12 Computer Science Standards.

Elgazzar, A.E. (2014). Developing E-Learning Environments for Field Practitioners and Developmental Researchers: A Third Revision of an ISD Model to Meet E-Learning and Distance Learning Innovations. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 29-37.

González, L. F. M., & Quiroz, V. G. (2019). Instructional Design in Online Education: A Systemic Approach. European Journal of Education, 2(3), 64-73.

Grizioti, M., & Kynigos, C. (2018). Game Modeling for Computational Thinking: An Integrated Design Approach. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, (687-692). ACM.

Harrison, A., Hulse, T., Manzo, D., Micciolo, M., Ottmar, E., & Arroyo, I. (2018). Computational Thinking Through Game Creation in STEM Classrooms. Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer, Cham, 134-138.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2019). Computational Thinking Competencies. https://iste.org/standards/computational-thinking.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2011). Operational Definitions Of Computational Thinking.

International Baccalaureate Organization (IBO). (2013). IB Learner Profile. https://ibo.org/contentassets/fd82f70643ef4086b7d3f292cc214962/learner-profile-en.pdf

Kazimoglu, C. (2013). Empirical Evidence That Proves A Serious Game is an Educationally Effective Tool for Learning Computer Programming Constructs at The Computational Thinking Level, PhD thesis, University of Greenwich. https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/11953/.

Kennedy, G., Petrovic, T., Judd, T., Lawrence, J., Dodds, A., Delbridge, L., & Harris, P. (2000). The Personal Learning Planner: A Software Support Tool For Self-Directed Learning. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.675.8431&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level-Model. Training & Development, (1), 54-57.

Kusnendar, J., & Prabawa, H. W. (2018). Using Nclab-Karel to Improve Computational Thinking Skill of Junior High School Students. Journal of Physics, Conference Series, 1013(1).

Lee, I. (2016). Reclaiming the Roots of CT. The Voice Of K–12 Computer Science Education and Its Educators, 12(1), 3-4.

Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., and Werner, L. (2011). Computational Thinking for Youth in Practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32-37.

Maxey, D. (2000). Learning Through Dignity: Participatory Communication Theory. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 790-794). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Mayer, R. E. (2019). How multimedia can improve learning and instruction. In J. Dunlosky and K. A. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education. (p. 460–479), Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, P. (2009). Computational Thinking: A Problem-Solving Tool for Every Classroom. Communications of the CSTA, 3(6), 12-16.

Price, J. F., Pimentel, D. S., McNeill, K. L., Barnett, M., & Strauss, E. (2011). Science in The 21st Century: More Than Just The Facts. The Science Teacher, 78(7), 36.

Rapanta, Ch., Maina, M., Lotz, N. , & Bacchelli, A. (2013). Team design communication patterns in e-learning design and development. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, (61), 581–605

Romero, M., Lepage, A., & Lille, B., (2017). Computational Thinking Development Through Creative Programming in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 42.

Rowe, E., Asbell-Clarke, J., Baker, R., Gasca, S., Bardar, E., & Scruggs, R. (2018). Labeling Implicit Computational Thinking in Pizza Pass Gameplay. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, (1-6).

Selby, C. (2014). How Can The Teaching of Programming Be Used toEnhance Computational Thinking Skills?. DAI-C, 74(9).

Siemens, G. (2008). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for The Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.

Sloman, A. (2012). What is Computational Thinking? Who Needs It? Why? (How Can it Be Learnt), ALT 2012 Conference Manchester 11 Sept 2012.

Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., & Lin, Q. (2019). Improving and Assessing Computational Thinking in Maker Activities: The Integration with Physics and Engineering Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-26.

World Economic Forum. (2016). The Future of Jobs, Global Challenge Insight Report. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf.

Wing, J. (2008). Computational Thinking and Thinking About Computing. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London, mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725.

Zhao, W., & Shute, J. (2019). Can Playing a Video Game Foster Computational Thinking Skills?. Computers & Education, (141), 103-633.

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Seitan, W. ., & Aljarrah, A. . (2021). Designing a Training Program Based on the Connectivism Theory to Measure its Impact on Developing the Computational Thinking Skills . Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 48(4), 32–47. Retrieved from http://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/2920

Issue

Section

Articles