Constructing a Diagnostic Scale to Distinguish between Surface and Deep Dyslexia in the Light of the Dual-route Model for Reading and Detecting its Effectiveness in the Jordanian Environment

Authors

  • Mayada Al-Natour Department of Counselling and Special Education, School of Educational Sciences, The University of Jordan, Jordan
  • Faten Al-Mashayek Department of Counselling and Special Education, School of Educational Sciences, The University of Jordan, Jordan

Keywords:

Dyslexia, surface dyslexia, deep dyslexia, dual-route model

Abstract

This study aims at constructing a diagnostic scale to distinguish between surface and deep dyslexia in the light of the dual-route model, verifying its psychometric characteristics and detecting the differences in its lexical route and non-lexical route according to the reading routes mentioned in the dual-route model of reading. The study sample of 120 students, was chosen from the fourth grade in public and private schools in the directorates of education in Al-Mazar and Al-Karak. The scale consisted of (230) items distributed to three domains: non-lexical route, lexical route, and diagnosing the characteristics of deep dyslexia. The results verified the instrument's validity and reliability. The results revealed that there are statistically significant differences at (α=0.05) between the mean scores for the performance of the surface and deep-dyslexic students and the non-dyslexic students in favor of the non-dyslexic students. The results showed that the performance of surface-dyslexia students was better in the non-lexical route and the characteristics of deep dyslexia, while their performance was lower in the lexical route, indicating the healthy case of the non-lexical route and the unhealthy case of the lexical route among the students with surface dyslexia. The deep-dyslexic students had lower scores on all the domains of the scale, indicating the unhealthy state of both lexical and non-lexical routes; therefore, the characteristics of deep dyslexia apply to them. This indicates that the scale, he thought of as the dual-route model for reading, is capable of distinguishing between two sub-types of dyslexia: surface dyslexia and deep dyslexia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Azary, H., McAuley, T., Buchanan, L., & Katz, A. (2019). Semantic processing of metaphor: A case-study of deep dyslexia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 297 – 308.

Aldera, M. (2017). Application of The Dual-Route Model in Exploring Dyslexia and Dysgraphia in Arabic Speaking Adults With Aphasia: Clinical and Theoretical Implications. Seton Hall University.‏

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). DSM-V Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Binder, J. R., Pillay, S. B., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Graves, W. W., & Book, D. S. (2016). Surface errors without semantic impairment in acquired dyslexia: a voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping study. Brain, 139(5), 1517-1526.‏

Birch, S. L. (2016). Prevalence and profile of phonological and surface subgroups in college students with a history of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 339-353.‏

Boumaraf.A., & Macoir, J. (2016). The influence of visual word form in reading: single case study of an Arabic patient with deep dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 29(1), 137-158.

Crisp, j., Howard, D., Matthew, A., & Ralph, L. (2011). More evidence for a continuum between phonological and deep dyslexia: Novel data from three measures of direct orthography-to-phonology translation. Aphasiology, 25(5), 615-641.

Dotan, D., & Friedmann, N. (2018). A cognitive model for multidigit number reading: Inferences from individuals with selective impairments. Cortex. 101, 249-281.

Dulay, K. M., & Hanley, J. R. (2015), Stress errors in a case of develop-mental surface dyslexia in Filipino. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32, 29–37.

Folegatti, A., Pia, L., Berti, A., & Cubelli, R. (2015). Stress assignment errors in surface dyslexia: evidence from two Italian patients with a selective deficit of the orthographic input lexicon. Behavioural neurology, 2015.‏

Friedmann, N., & Coltheart, M. (2014). Types of developmental dyslexia. Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistics perspectives. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Friedmann, N., & Haddad-Hanna, M. (2014). Types of developmental dyslexia in Arabic. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Arabic Literacy: Theoretical Insights and Practical Challenges. Language and Literacy Series (119-152). Springer: The Netherlands.

Goswami, U., Gerson, D., & Astruc, L. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 995-1019.‏

Goswami, U. (2015). Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: three challenges for research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(1), 43-54.‏

Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. (2011). A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(54), 13.

Gvion, A., & Friedmann, N. (2013). A selective deficit in imageable concepts: A window to the organization of the conceptual system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(226), 2-13.

Horowitz, S.H., Rawe, J., & Whittaker, M.C. (2017). The State of Learning Disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5. New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities.

Katan, p., Kahta, s., Sasson, A., & Schiff, R. (2016). Performance of children with developmental dyslexia on high and low topological entropy artificial grammar learning task. Ann of Dyslexia, 67(2), 163–179.

Klein, D., Behrmann, M., & Doctor, E. (2007). The Evolution of Deep Dyslexia: Evidence for the Spontaneous Recovery of the Semantic Reading Route. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(5), 579-611.

Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., Geigis, L., Coltheart, M., Mcarthur., G., &Castles., A. (2018). Variations within a subtype: developmental surface dyslexias in English. Department of Cognitive Science, 106(10), 151-163.

Law, C., & Cupples, l. (2016). Thinking outside the boxes: Using current reading models to assess and treat developmental surface dyslexia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(2), 149–195.

Lerner, J. W., & Johns, B. (2014). Learning disabilities and related disabilities: Strategies for success. Cengage Learning.‏

Malhi, S., McAuley, T., Lansue, B., & Buchanan, L. (2019). Concrete and abstract word processing in deep dyslexia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 309–323.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. (2017). Specific language impairment. Retrieved from https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/%20health%20/%20specific-languageimpairment.

Peterson, R., Pennington, B., & Olson, R. (2013). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Testing the predictions of the dual-route and connectionist frameworks. Cognition, 126(1), 20-38.

Rapcsak, SZ., Henry, ML., Teague, SL., Carnahan, SD., & Beeson, P. (2007). Do dual-route models accurately predict reading and spelling performance in individuals with acquired alexia and agraphia? Neuropsychologia, 45, 2519–24.

Roncoli, S. (2016). Phonological and semantic processes in children aged 8-9 years with different types of developmental dyslexia, Unpublished Phd Thesis, UCL Institute of Education, UK.

Shu, H., Meng, X., Chen, X., Luan, H., & Cao, F. (2005). The subtypes of developmental dyslexia in Chinese: Evidence from three cases. Dyslexia, 11, 311–329.

Sotirios, D., Douklias, J., & Richard, H. (2010). Surface and phonological developmental dyslexia in Greek.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(8),705-723.

Sotiropoulos, A., & Hanley, J. R. (2017). Lexical decision performance in developmental surface dysgraphia: Evidence for a unitary orthographic system that is used in both reading and spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(3 and 4),144-62.

Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2011). Dyslexia subtypes in languages differing in orthographic transparency: English, French and Spanish. Escritos de Psicología, 4(2), 5 –16.

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L, Jimenez, J., & Ziegler, J. (2011). Prevalence and reliability of phonological, surface, and mixed profles in dyslexia: A review of studies conducted in languages varying in orthographic depth. Scientific Studies of Reading (SSR), 6(15), 498-521.

Stein, J. (2014). Dyslexia: the role of vision and visual Attention Students with Dyslexia. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 56(1), 73-91.

Wang, H., Nation, K., Castles, L., & Nickels, L. (2013). Predictors of Orthographic Learning of Regular and Irregular Words. Scientific Studies of Reading.17(5), 369-384.

Wilson, M. A., & Martínez-Cuitiño, M. (2012). Semantic dementia without surface dyslexia in Spanish: Unimpaired reading with impaired semantics. Behavioural Neurology, 25, 273–284.

Wolf, U. (2009). Phonological and Surface Subtypes among University Students with Dyslexia. International Journal of Disability. Development and Education, 59, 73–91

Wybrow, D., & Hanley, J. (2015). Surface developmental dyslexia is as prevalent as phonological dyslexia when appropriate control groups are employed. Cogn Neuropsychol, 32(1), 1-13.

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Al-Natour, M. ., & Al-Mashayek, F. . (2021). Constructing a Diagnostic Scale to Distinguish between Surface and Deep Dyslexia in the Light of the Dual-route Model for Reading and Detecting its Effectiveness in the Jordanian Environment. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 48(4), 221–243. Retrieved from http://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/2933

Issue

Section

Articles