تحليل فوقي لأثر طرائق التدريس في التحصيل الرياضي للبحوث المنشورة ضمن الفترة (1974-2022)

المؤلفون

  • Muhannad Farhan Al-Qudah قسم المناهج والتدريس، كلية العلوم التربوية، الجامعة الأردنية، عمّان, الأردن https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-6767
  • Ibrahim Ahmad El-Shara قسم المناهج والتدريس، كلية العلوم التربوية، الجامعة الأردنية، عمّان, الأردن https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-1167

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i1.5598

الكلمات المفتاحية:

التحليل الفوقي، حجم الأثر، طرائق تدريس الرياضيات، التحصيل الرياضي

الملخص

الأهداف: هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى حساب متوسطات حجوم الأثر للدراسات التجريبية وشبه التجريبية؛ لأثر طرائق تدريس الرياضيات في التحصيل الرياضي، المنشورة في بعض المجلات الأردنية المحكمة.

المنهجية: طُوّر نموذج ترميز، وتم التحقق من دلالات صدقه وثباته، واستخدم التحليل الفوقي بالأسلوب الوصفي التحليلي لحساب متوسطات حجوم الأثر، وشملت العينة (37) دراسة أولية أُختيرت وفق معايير محددة.

النتائج: أظهرت نتائج الدراسة أن متوسط حجم الأثر الكلي للدراسات الأولية بلغت (1.324؛ 1.359؛ 1.357) للمتغيرات: نوع المعالجة، والجنس، والمرحلة الأساسية، على الترتيب ويدل على مستوى كبير جدًا لحجم الأثر، وغير دال للمرحلة الجامعية، بينما بلغ بمستوى ضخم (1.702؛ 2.167) لمتغيري حجم العينة التي عددها (5-55) فردا، ومدة التطبيق ضمن الفترة (أسبوع – أسبوعين)، وكشفت النتائج الوصفية لمتغيرات الدراسات الأولية عدة نتائج أهمها: قلة الدراسات الأولية المطبقة على مدارس خاصة، وظهر فقر بالدراسات الأولية على الطلبة الموهوبين، واستخدم معظمها صدق المحتوى، ولم يعثر على أي دراسة أستخدمت طريقة الصور المتكافئة للتحقق من الثبات، وقلة الدراسات الأولية التي أوردت مؤشرات مربع إيتا وقوة الاختبار الإحصائي.

الخلاصة: توصلت النتائج إلى عدم وجود تجانس في متوسطات حجوم الأثر للدراسات الأولية التي أجريت في مجال طرائق تدريس الرياضيات وأثرها على التحصيل الرياضي بالفترة (1974-2022) تبعًا لمتغيرات المرحلة الدراسية، وفئة الطلبة، وحجم العينة، ومدة تطبيق الدراسة، وبناء على النتائج، يوصى بإجراء دراسات بموضوع أثر طرائق التدريس في التحصيل الرياضي على عينات من طلبة المرحلة الجامعية، والطلبة الموهوبين، وضرورة زياد حجم العينات، ومدة تطبيق الدراسة.

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.

المراجع

Akinsola, M. K. (2007). The Effect of Simulation Games Environment on Students Achievement and Attitudes to Mathematics in Secondary School. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(3).

Al-Atoum, S., & De Baz, T. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Applying Concept Maps and Inquiry Teaching Strategies on the Achievement of Students in Science. Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 3 (3), 251-272.

Alhadoor, Z., Aldbyani, A., & Alshammari, K. (2023). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of strategies and programs used to address the mathematics learning difficulties. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2337, 1-13.

Al-Juhani, L. (2017). The efficiency of e-learning in the light of the dimensional analysis of the results of studies published in some Arab periodicals during the period (2005-2015). The International Journal of Specialized Education, 6 (7), 17-33.

AL-Karamneh, M., & Abu-Sneineh, O. (2020). The Effect of Teaching Using the Six Thinking Hats on Academic Achievement and Attitudes Towards Mathematics with Sixth Graders in Jordan. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 47(3), 281-295.

Al-Kilani, A., & Al-Sharbain, N. (2011). An Introduction to Research in Educational and Social Sciences: Its Fundamentals, Methodologies, Designs, and Statistical Methods. (3rd ed.). Amman: Dar Al Masirah.

Allam, S. (2001). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation, its basics, applications, and contemporary directives. Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi.

Alsheikh, O. (2001). Evaluation of the Curricula and Textbooks Program, Report No. (5), Series of Studies of the National Center for Human Resources Development, Amman, Jordan.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American psychological association. (6th ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Ayaz, M. & Sekerci, H. (2015). The Effects of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Student’s Academic Achievement: a meta-analysis Study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 143-156.

Bas, G., & Beyhan, O. (2019). Revisiting the Effect of Teaching of Learning Strategies on Academic Achievement: A Meta-analysis of the Findings. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5(1), 70-87.

Borgman, C. & ,Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly Communications and Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, )136(, 2-34.

Brendle, K. (2011). A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Child-parent Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago.

Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 9, 88-113.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255.

Cogaltay, N. & Karadag, E. (2015). Introduction to meta-analysis. In Leadership and Organizational outcomes. Springer International Publishing.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (2019). The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cooper, J. (1974). Measurement and analysis of Behavioral Techniques. Columbus Ohio: Merril Pub Co.

Decoster, J. (2004). Meta-Analysis Notes. University of Alabama. Retrieved on july, 2023, Available at: http://www.stat-help.com/meta.pdf.

Delgado, M., & Sillero, M. (2018). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Intensive, 42(7), 444-453.

Domino, G. )2002). Psychological testing: an introduction. West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Erdogan, A., & Yucedag, T. (2011). Investigation of theses in mathematics education according to research topics studied between 2000 and 2009 in Turkey. Procedia social and behavioral sciences,15, 2738-2741.

Glass, G. (1976). Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. American Educational Research Association, 5(10), 3-8.

Glass, G. (1982). Meta-analysis: An approach to the synthesis of research results. Journal of research in science teaching, 19(2), 93-112.

Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). An exchange: Part I: Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational researcher, 23(3), 5-14.

Ishtay, S., & El-Shara, I. (2020). A Historical Study for Meta-Analysis in the field of Psychological and Educational studies. Studies Educational & Psychological, 1(16), 395-414.

Ishtay, S. (2020). A Meta-analysis of the impact of the strategy of solving emerging technology problems on mathematical achievement and the development of thinking skills in master's theses and doctoral dissertations during the period (1990-2017). PhD thesis, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Jacobse, A. E., & Harskamp, E. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effects of instructional interventions on students' mathematics achievement. GION, Groningen Institute for Educational Research, Education and Development, University of Groningen.

Jaradat, D. & Joudeh, M. (2005). The power of statistical testing, effect size, and sample size for studies published in the Yarmouk Research Journal - Humanities and Social Sciences Series. Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 21-29.

Khasawneh, A. (2007). Levels of thinking in spatial geometry among tenth grade students. Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 3 (1), 11-32.

Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.

Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. London, California, New Delhi, Singapore: SAGE publications Ltd.

Mahasneh, N. (2019). Meta-analysis of the results of theses that dealt with the effectiveness of the constructivist learning approach in Jordanian universities during the period from 2010-2017. PhD thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.

Mersal, E. (2018). Educational research in the field of teaching and learning mathematics: a future vision in the light of contemporary global trends. Journal of Mathematics Narrations, 8 (21), 87-131.

Mohamed, H. (2019). Validity and Reliability of Measurement in Psychological and Educational Research: A Comparison of Multigroup Affirmative Factor Analysis and Single Response Theory. Egyptian Journal of Psychological Studies, 29(139), 25-56.

Myers, J. A., Witzel, B. S., Powell, S. R., Li, H., Pigott, T. D., Xin, Y. P., & Hughes, E. M. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Word-Problem Solving Interventions for Elementary Students Who Evidence Mathematics Difficulties. Review of Educational Research, Retrieved on july, 2023, Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654321107004.

National council of teachers of mathematics. (2016). NCTM annual meeting & Exposition. San Francisco.

National Research Council (NCR). (2001). Helping children learn mathematics. Retrieved on September, 2022, Available at: http://www.naep.edu/openbook.php?record_9.

Obeid, W. (2010). Teaching mathematics to all students in light of the requirements of standards and the culture of thinking. (2nd ed.). Amman: Dar Al Masirah for publication and distribution.

Polanin, J., & Snilstveit, B. (2016). Campbell methods policy note on converting between effect sizes. Oslo: The Campbell Collaboration.

Robert, R., Mary Margaret, D., & Roslinda, R. (2014). The Effect of Problem Posing on Student Mathematical Learning: A meta-analysis. International Education studies, 7(13), 241-277.

Rudner, L. M. )1994(. Questions to ask when evaluating tests. Practical Assessment, Researchand Evaluation, 4 (2), 1-4

Sharideh, S., & Alsmadi, A. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Developing Divergent Thinking Skills Programs in Master and Doctoral Dissertations at Arabian Gulf University (1994-2016). Dirasat:Educational Sciences, 45(3), 49-69.

Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. (2002). How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted. Statistics in medicine, 21(11), 1559-1573.

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational research methods, 3(1), 4-70.

Wang, M., Walkington, C., & Rouse, A. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effects of problem-posing in mathematics education on performance and dispositions. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 14(4), 265-287.

Zaza, H. (2011). The degree of compatibility of the indications of the validity and reliability of the standardized tests used in the master’s theses submitted in the faculties of education in Jordanian universities with the indications of their original copies, Dirasat:Educational Sciences, 2 (38), 2400-2416.

التنزيلات

منشور

2024-03-15

كيفية الاقتباس

Al-Qudah, M. F., & El-Shara, I. A. . (2024). تحليل فوقي لأثر طرائق التدريس في التحصيل الرياضي للبحوث المنشورة ضمن الفترة (1974-2022). دراسات: العلوم التربوية, 51(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i1.5598

إصدار

القسم

المناهج والتدريس
##plugins.generic.dates.received## 2023-09-03
##plugins.generic.dates.accepted## 2023-10-11
##plugins.generic.dates.published## 2024-03-15