رجوع الزوجة على زوجها بما أنفقت على نفسها في الفقه الإسلامي وقانوني الأحوال الشخصية الأردني والإماراتي

Emad Abdel Hafiz Ali Alzyadat; Mohammad Mahmoud Alemoush; Kathafi Izzat Abdel Hadi Al Ghananim

doi:10.35516/law.v52i3.9138

Authors

Emad Abdel Hafiz Ali Alzyadat Department Fiqh and Its Foundations, College of Sharia and Islamic Studies, The University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Department Fiqh and Its Foundations, College of Sharia, University of Jordan, Amman, Gordan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2889-6641
Mohammad Mahmoud Alemoush Department Fiqh and Its Foundations, College of Sharia and Islamic Studies, The University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-2559
Kathafi Izzat Abdel Hadi Al Ghananim Department Fiqh and Its Foundations, College of Sharia and Islamic Studies, The University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Department Fiqh and Its Foundations, College of Sharia, University of Jordan, Amman, Gordan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-7904

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v52i3.9138

Keywords:

Alimony, wife, return, jurisprudence, personal status.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to provide an explanation of the wife’s ruling on recourse to her husband for what she spent on herself from her own money, or borrowed in Islamic jurisprudence and Jordanian and Emirati personal status laws.

Methods: The issue was studied through two approaches: The analytical approach, by analyzing the sayings of jurists and their evidence on the issue, and the comparative approach to compare between the schools of thought of jurists and the specific legal texts on the issue.

Results: The study concluded that a husband must provide for his wife, whether in times of ease or hardship. If he fails to do so and his wife fulfills this obligation on his behalf, she has the right to seek reimbursement from him, provided they mutually agreed on this arrangement or a court ruled in favor of the maintenance. However, her claim for reimbursement is contingent upon this agreement or legal ruling and cannot be made before such steps are taken.

Conclusion: The Islamic jurisprudential schools agreed on the wife's right to seek reimbursement from her husband for what she spent on herself. However, they differed regarding the circumstances in which this right is established and when it is forfeited. Consequently, personal status laws varied in their details, depending on the school of thought each law adopted. The study recommends conducting comparative jurisprudential research on personal status laws, particularly in the nuanced aspects related to family matters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

al-ʻAynī, M. (2000). albnāyh sharḥ al-Hidāyah, taḥqīq Ayman Ṣāliḥ Shaʻbān, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

al-ʻAẓīm Ābādī, M. (1415h). ʻAwn al-Maʻbūd sharḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūd, ṭ2, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

al-Baghawī, Ḥ. (1997). al-Tahdhīb fī fiqh al-Imām al-Shāfiʻī, taḥqīq ʻĀdil Aḥmad ʻAbd al-Mawjūd, ʻAlī Muḥammad Muʻawwaḍ, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

al-Bayhaqī, U. (2011). al-sunan al-Kubrá, taḥqīq ʻAbd Allāh ibn ʻAbd al-Muḥsin al-Turkī, Markaz Hajar lil-Buḥūth wa-al-Dirāsāt al-ʻArabīyah wa-al-Islāmīyah.

al-Dasūqī, M. (D. t). Ḥāshiyat al-Dasūqī ʻalá al-sharḥ al-kabīr, Dār al-Fikr.

al-Hararī al-Shāfiʻī, M. (2001). tafsīr Ḥadāʼiq al-rūḥ wa-al-rayḥān fī Rawābī ʻulūm al-Qurʼān, Ṭ1, Bayrūt, Dār Ṭawq al-najāh.

al-Ḥijjāwī, Sh. (D. t). al-Iqnāʻ fī fiqh al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Dār al-Maʻrifah.

al-Isnawī, J. (2009). al-muhimmāt fī sharḥ al-Rawḍah wālrāfʻy, Ṭ1, Markaz al-Turāth al-Thaqāfī al-Maghribī, al-Maghrib, Lubnān, Dār Ibn Ḥazm.

al-Jawharī, I. (1987). al-ṣiḥāḥ Tāj al-lughah al-ʻArabīyah wa-ṣiḥāḥ al-ʻArabīyah, ṭ4, taḥqīq : Aḥmad ʻAbd al-Ghafūr ʻAṭṭār, Bayrūt, Dār al-ʻIlm lil-Malāyīn.

al-Kāsānī, ʻA. (1327-1328). Badāʼiʻ al-ṣanāʼiʻ fī tartīb al-sharāʼiʻ, Maṭbaʻat Sharikat al-Maṭbūʻāt al-ʻIlmīyah, wa-Maṭbaʻat al-Jamālīyah.

al-Kharashī, M. (1317H). Ḥāshiyat al-Kharashī ʻalá Mukhtaṣar Khalīl, ṭ2, Miṣr, al-Maṭbaʻah al-Kubrá al-Amīrīyah.

al-Maghribī, M. (2007). albdru al-tamām sharḥ Bulūgh al-marām, ṭ1, taḥqīq ʻAlī ibn ʻAbd Allāh al-Zabin, Dār Hajar.

al-Māwardī, ʻA. (1999). al-Ḥāwī al-kabīr fī fiqh madhhab al-Imām al-Shāfiʻī, taḥqīq ʻAlī Muḥammad Muʻawwaḍ wa-ʻĀdil Aḥmad ʻAbd al-Mawjūd, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

al-Nawawī, M. (1408). taḥrīr alfāẓ al-Tanbīh, Ṭ1, taḥqīq ʻAbd al-Ghanī al-Daqr, Dimashq, Dār al-Qalam.

al-Nawawī, M. (1991). Rawḍat al-ṭālibīn wa-ʻumdat al-muftīn, ṭ3, taḥqīq Qism al-taḥqīq wa-al-taṣḥīḥ fī al-Maktab al-Islāmī, al-Maktab al-Islāmī.

al-Rāfiʻī, ʻA. (1997). al-ʻAzīz sharḥ al-Wajīz al-maʻrūf bi-al-sharḥ al-kabīr, ṭ1, taḥqīq ʻAlī Muḥammad ʻAwaḍ wa-ʻĀdil Aḥmad ʻAbd al-Mawjūd, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

Alrḥybāny, M. (1994). maṭālib ūlī al-nuhá fī sharḥ Ghāyat al-Muntahá, ṭ2, al-Maktab al-Islāmī.

Alrwyāny, ʻA. (2009). Baḥr al-madhhab fī furūʻ al-madhhab al-Shāfiʻī, taḥqīq Ṭāriq Fatḥī al-Sayyid, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

al-Sarakhsī, M. (D. t). al-Mabsūṭ, Dār al-Saʻādah.

al-Ṣāwī, U. (D. t). Ḥāshiyat al-Ṣāwī ʻalá al-sharḥ al-Ṣaghīr, Dār al-Maʻārif.

al-Shīrāzī, I. (D. t). al-Muhadhdhab fī fiqh al-Imām al-Shāfiʻī, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

al-Shirbīnī, M. (1994). Mughnī al-muḥtāj ilá maʻrifat maʻānī alfāẓ al-Minhāj, ṭ1, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

al-Shirbīnī, M. (D. t). al-Iqnāʻ fī ḥall alfāẓ Abī Shujāʻ, taḥqīq : Maktab al-Buḥūth wa-al-Dirāsāt, Dār al-Fikr.

al-ʻUmrānī, Y. (2000). al-Bayān fī madhhab al-Imām al-Shāfiʻī, taḥqīq Qāsim Muḥammad al-Nūrī, Dār al-Minhāj.

al-Zarkashī, b. (1985). al-manthūr fī al-qawāʻid al-fiqhīyah, ṭ2, taḥqīq Taysīr Fāʼiq Aḥmad Maḥmūd, Wizārat al-Awqāf al-Kuwaytīyah.

al-Zaylaʻī, ʻA. (1314h). Tabyīn al-ḥaqāʼiq sharḥ Kanz al-daqāʼiq, Ṭ1, al-Qāhirah, al-Maṭbaʻah al-Kubrá al-Amīrīyah.

al-Zubaydī, M. (2001). Tāj al-ʻarūs min Jawāhir al-Qāmūs, taḥqīq : Jamāʻat min al-mukhtaṣṣīn, al-Kuwayt, al-Majlis al-Waṭanī lil-Thaqāfah wa-al-Funūn wa-al-Ādāb.

al-Zurqānī, ʻA. (2002). sharḥ alzzurqāny ʻalá Mukhtaṣar Khalīl, Ṭ1, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

Awiety, J., & Riyadi, A. (2020). History of Joint Marital Property in Indonesia and its Legalization. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 8(2), 94-112. (https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol8no2.256)

Ibn al-Athīr, M. (2005). al-Shāfī fī sharḥ Musnad al-Shāfiʻī, Ṭ1, taḥqīq Aḥmad ibn Sulaymān wa-Abī Tamīm yāsr ibn Ibrāhīm, al-Riyāḍ, Maktabat al-Rushd.

Ibn al-humām, K. (1970). sharḥ Fatḥ al-qadīr ʻalá al-Hidāyah, Ṭ1, Miṣr, Sharikat Maktabat wa-Maṭbaʻat mṣfá al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.

Ibn al-Najjār, M. (2008). mʻwnh ūlá al-nuhá, ṭ5, taḥqīq ʻAbd al-Malik ibn ʻAbd Allāh Duhaysh, Makkah al-Mukarramah, Maktabat al-Asadī.

Ibn al-Qāsim, ʻA. (1397h). Ḥāshiyat al-Rawḍ al-murbiʻ sharḥ Zād al-mustaqniʻ, Ṭ1.

Ibn ʻArafah, M. (2014). al-Mukhtaṣar al-fiqhī, taḥqīq Ḥāfiẓ ʻAbd al-Raḥmān Muḥammad Khayr, Muʼassasat Khalaf Aḥmad alkhbtwr lil-aʻmāl al-Khayrīyah.

Ibn Fāris, U. (1979). Muʻjam Maqāyīs al-lughah, taḥqīq ʻAbd al-Salām Muḥammad Hārūn, Dār al-Fikr.

Ibn Ḥazm, ʻA. (D. t). almuḥllá wa-al-āthār, taḥqīq ʻAbd al-Ghaffār Sulaymān al-Bindārī, Dār al-Fikr.

Ibn manẓūr, M. (1414h). Lisān al-ʻArab, ṭ3, Dār Ṣādir.

Ibn Māzah, b. (2004). al-muḥīṭ al-burhānī fī al-fiqh al-Nuʻmānī, Ṭ1, taḥqīq ʻAbd al-Karīm Sāmī al-Jundī, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

Ibn Mufliḥ, I. (1997). al-mubdiʻ fī sharḥ al-Muqniʻ, Ṭ1, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

Ibn Nujaym, S. (2000). al-nahr al-fāʼiq sharḥ Kanz al-daqāʼiq, Ṭ1, taḥqīq Aḥmad ʻIzzū ʻInāyat, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

Ibn Nujaym, Z. (D. t). al-Baḥr al-rāʼiq sharḥ Kanz al-daqāʼiq, ṭ2, Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī.

Ibn Qudāmah, M. (1994). al-Kāfī fī fiqh al-Imām Aḥmad, Ṭ1, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.

Ibn Qudāmah, M. (1997). al-Mughnī, ṭ3, taḥqīq ʻAbd alllah ibn ʻAbd al-Muḥsin al-Turkī, al-Duktūr ʻAbd al-Fattāḥ Muḥammad al-Ḥulw, al-Riyāḍ, Dār ʻĀlam al-Kutub lil-Ṭibāʻah.

Muslim, M., (1955). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, taḥqīq Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī, Bayrūt, Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.

Rababa’a , M. A., & Al-Sharman, H. (2023). Wives’ Opinions on the Extent to which their Husbands Consider the Family Prophetic Communication Skills: A Field Study. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(5), 164–192. (https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.5837)

Shuaib, M. (2023). Takaful Al-Ijtima'i in Islam: A Comparative Study with Contemporary Economic Systems. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 11(1), 122-141. (https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no1.417)