The Impact of Makerspace within STEM Domains on Creative Confidence, Problem-Solving, and Student Engagement in Elementary Schools in Jerusalem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/Edu.2026.13578Keywords:
Makerspace, creative confidence, problem‑solving skill, student engagement, STEM educationAbstract
Objectives: K–12 makerspaces are widely promoted as environments that foster twenty-first-century competencies, yet rigorous causal evidence at the elementary level—particularly across multiple learning outcomes—remains limited. This study examined whether sustained makerspace participation improves elementary students’ creative confidence, problem-solving skills, and engagement during STEM instruction. It was hypothesized that students working in a makerspace would outperform peers following the same curriculum in a conventional classroom.
Methods: Sixty sixth-grade students from schools in Jerusalem were selected through simple random sampling and randomly assigned to an experimental makerspace group or a control classroom group. Both groups completed 15 STEM design challenges over a 12-week after-school program during the first semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. Post-test data were collected using three validated questionnaires measuring creative confidence, problem-solving skills, and engagement.
Results: MANOVA revealed a statistically significant multivariate effect (p < .05). Follow-up ANOVAs showed significantly higher scores for makerspace students across the measured outcomes. Discriminant function analysis indicated that problem-solving skill was the strongest contributor to group differentiation (β = .852), followed by creative confidence (β = .510) and engagement (β = .441).
Conclusions: Elementary makerspaces provide supportive environments that strengthen students’ confidence in their creative abilities, enhance strategic reasoning, and sustain engagement in STEM tasks. Integrating makerspaces into early curricula may accelerate engineering education outcomes, while longitudinal studies are needed to examine the durability of these gains and their influence on later academic achievement.
Downloads
References
Alissa, Y. M. J., & Ejbara, M. A. M. (2020). Attitudes of teachers of science, mathematics, and computer toward the use of the STEM approach in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics teaching in the Riyadh educational area. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 47(1), 287–301. https://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/1759
AlShabnuti, A. A., Al-Balushi, S. M., Kazem, A. M., & Ambusaidi, A. K. (2024). The effectiveness of learning based on integrating 3D printing technology into physics in developing scientific and engineering practices (SEPS) among 10th grade students in the Sultanate of Oman. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 51(4), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i4.8343
Alshunnaq, M. M., & Kraishan, O. M. (2020). Perceptions of mathematics and sciences teachers according to the science, technology, society, and environment (STSE) approach and their relation to some variables. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 47(1), 170–182. https://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/1714
Alvarez-Huerta, P., Muela, A., & Larrea, I. (2021). Student engagement and creative confidence beliefs in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100821
Becker, S., O’Connell, L., & Wuitschik, L. (2016). Professional learning in the makerspace: Embodiment of the teaching effectiveness framework. University of Calgary.
Capel, T. (2023). Making a makerspace: Reimagining makerspaces for women’s participation (Doctoral thesis, Queensland University of Technology). https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.238189
Ching, Y.-H., & Jones, R. (2021). The impact of makerspaces on student learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 34, 100402.
Ching, Y.-H., Hsu, Y.-S., & Baldwin, S. (2018). Developing creative confidence through makerspaces. Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 289–299.
Choi, E., Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2022). Makerspace activities and student engagement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 180, 104432.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2019). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Garcia, E., & Smith, J. (2021). Makerspaces and equity: Ensuring access for all students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(3), 345–358.
Gravel, B. E., & Puckett, C. (2023). What shapes implementation of a school-based makerspace? Teachers as multilevel actors in STEM reforms. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00395-x
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.
Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
IEA. (2023). TIMSS 2023 international results in mathematics and science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://url-shortener.me/76X3
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Khan, M., & Rehmat, A. (2022). Makerspaces in developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 112–123.
Leung, F. K. S. (2018). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? Routledge.
Li, X., He, J., & Zhang, R. (2023). The role of makerspaces in fostering innovation among primary students. Computers & Education, 180, 104432.
Loertscher, D. V., Preddy, L., & Derry, B. (2016). Makerspaces: A practical guide for school librarians. ABC-CLIO.
Loibl, K., Roll, I., & Rummel, N. (2017). Towards a theory of when and how problem solving followed by instruction supports learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 693–715.
Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(1), 30–39.
Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2019). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom (2nd ed.). Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Harnessing spatial thinking to support STEM learning. OECD Education Working Papers (No. 161). https://doi.org/10.1787/7d5dcaef-en
OECD. (2021). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of learning. OECD Publishing.
Ozhan, M. B., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). Development of a student engagement scale for online learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4301–4320.
Palestinian Ministry of Education. (2022). STEM challenge workshop manual.
Patterson, M., Brown, T., & Smith, L. (2023). Evaluating the impact of makerspaces on student creativity. Journal of Educational Research, 116(2), 123–135.
Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2020). Maker-based learning: Enhancing young people’s skills to shape their worlds. Corwin Press.
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283.
Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. MIT Press.
Rouse, R., & Rouse, A. G. (2022). Taking the maker movement to school: A systematic review of preK–12 school-based makerspace research. Educational Research Review, 35, 100413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100413
Ruiz Viruel, A., Sánchez Rivas, E., & Ruiz Palmero, J. (2025). The impact of makerspaces on student engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 45–60.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Saorín, J. L., et al. (2017). Enhancing creativity in education through the use of 3D printing. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(3), 282–294.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Shernoff, D. J., et al. (2020). The engagement of students in learning: A review of theory and research. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1–17.
Shively, K., & Rutstein, D. W. (2023). Makerspaces and design thinking: A path toward equitable STEM learning. STEM Education Review, 9(1), 101–116.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). The impact of classroom-based robotics and programming on young children's STEM learning. Computers & Education, 141, 103641.
Tan, M., et al. (2019). Designing for maker-centered learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 4–20.
UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dirasat: Educational Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
