تحليل للدوافع الضمنية بين ثقافات مختلفة في السرد المكتوب ردّاً على اختبار إدراك الموضوع (TAT) : دراسة باستخدام نظرية القابلية الدافعية وأداة اللغة LIWC-22

المؤلفون

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.12057

الكلمات المفتاحية:

الدوافع الضمنية ، السرد في الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية، LIWC-22، اختبار إدراك الموضوعات (TAT) ، نظرية الدوافع المتأصلة ((MDT ، ثقافات متعددة.

الملخص

 

الأهداف: تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى استكشاف الفروقات الثقافية في بناء السرد القصصي لدى طلاب جامعيين ثنائيي اللغة من المجر والأردن ضمن سياق الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية .(EFL)

المنهجية: شارك في الدراسة 100 طالب (50 من المجر و50 من الأردن)، جميعهم طلاب بكالوريوس في تخصصات ذات صلة باللغة الإنجليزية (تتراوح أعمارهم بين 18 و25 عاماً)، حيث كتبوا سرديات باللغة الإنجليزية استجابةً لأربع بطاقات من اختبار إدراك الموضوعات (Thematic Apperception Test · (TAT)) . تم تحليل السرديات كمياً مع التركيز على الدوافع التحفيزية للإنجاز (Achievement)، والسلطة (Power)، والانتماء (Affiliation). استُخدمت نظرية الدوافع المتأصلة ((MDT) Motive Disposition Theory) ، وأداة تحليل اللغة LIWC-22، بالإضافة إلى الاختبارات الإحصائية الوصفية، (MANOVA)، وANOVA)) باستخدام برنامج SPSS لتقييم الفروق التحفيزية واللغوية-النفسية.

النتائج: تشير النتائج إلى وجود فروق دالة إحصائياً في دوافع الانتماء (Affiliation) بين المشاركين الأردنيين والهنغاريين مع وجود حجم تأثير صغير، في حين أظهرت دوافع الإنجاز (Achievement)  تفاوتاً ثقافياً طفيفاً، ولم تكشف دوافع السلطة (Power) عن أي اختلافات بين المجموعتين.   أظهر التحليل التفصيلي لكل بطاقة أن الموضوعات المرتبطة بالديناميات الأسرية والأدوار الجندرية كانت الأكثر اختلافاً من الناحية الثقافية، لا سيما في السرديات المتعلقة بعلاقات الأم والطفل. أما البطاقات التي جسدت مشاهد عاطفية مشحونة بالصراعات الشخصية، فقد استثارت ردوداً أكثر عالمية ومشتركة بين المشاركين من هاتين الثقافتين.

الخلاصة: في الختام، تسلط هذه الدراسة الضوء على التأثير العميق للخلفية الثقافية على بناء السرد، مما يتيح آثارًا على علم نفس الثقافات، ومنهجيات علم اللغات التطبيقي، وممارسات التعليم ثنائي اللغة.

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

المراجع

Altarriba, J. (2003). Does cariño equal “liking”? A theoretical approach to conceptual nonequivalence between languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070030501.

Appel, R., & Muysken, P. (1987). Language contact and bilingualism. Edward Arnold. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.6.2.15dis.

Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728905002397.

Bax, S. (2022). Text Inspector [Computer software]. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://textinspector.com/

Beller, S., Bender, A., & Medin, D. L. (2012). Should anthropology be part of cognitive science? Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(3), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01196.x.

Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2013). Cognition is… fundamentally cultural. Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3010042.

Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren’t fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1068.

Boyd, R. L., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2017). Language-based personality: A new approach to personality in a digital world. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.017.

Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 239–275). Routledge.

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.

Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Hofer, J. (2014). Childhood context explains cultural variance in implicit parenting motivation: Results from two studies with six samples from Cameroon, Costa Rica, Germany, and PR China. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200203.

Ching, J. W., McDermott, J. F., Fukunaga, C., Yanagida, E., Mann, E., & Waldron, J. A. (1995). Perceptions of family values and roles among Japanese Americans: Clinical considerations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079612.

Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Variations in the spacing of expressive writing sessions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910707X251171.

Coelho, G. V., Solomon, F., Wolff, C., Steinberg, A., & Hamburg, D. A. (1969). Predicting coping behavior in college: A prospective use of the student-TAT. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 149(5), 386–397.

Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.93.

Dana, R. H. (2000). Psychological assessment in the diagnosis and treatment of ethnic group members. In J. F. Aponte & J. Wohl (Eds.), Psychological intervention and cultural diversity (2nd ed., pp. 59–74). Allyn & Bacon.

de Groot, A. M., & Nas, G. L. (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 90–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90012-9.

de Groot, A. M. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1001–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1001.

de Groot, A. M. (1995). Determinants of bilingual lexicosemantic organisation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(2–3), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822940080204.

Dudău, D. P., & Sava, F. A. (2021). Performing multilingual analysis with Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (LIWC2015): An equivalence study of four languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 570568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570568.

Ervin, S. (1964). Personality and bilingualism. Language and Psychology, 1(1), 15–24.

Ferguson, M. J., Hassin, R., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Implicit motivation: Past, present, and future. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 150–166). The Guilford Press.

Gertken, L. M., Amengual, M., & Birdsong, D. (2014). Assessing language dominance with the bilingual language profile. In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp. 208–225). Multilingual Matters.

Gutchess, A., & Rajaram, S. (2023). Consideration of culture in cognition: How we can enrich methodology and theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 914–931. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02227-5.

Han, Z.-H., & Odlin, T. (2006). Introduction. In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 1–20). Multilingual Matters.

Hofer, J., Busch, H., Raihala, C., Poláčková Šolcová, I., & Tavel, P. (2017). The higher your implicit affiliation‐intimacy motive, the more loneliness can turn you into a social cynic: A cross‐cultural study. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 179–191.

Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935927.

Kashima, E. S., & Kashima, Y. (1998). Culture and language: The case of cultural dimensions and personal pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(3), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198293005.

Katsavdakis, K. A., Sayed, M., Bram, A., & Bartlett, A. B. (2001). How was this story told in the mother tongue? An integrative perspective. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65(2), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.65.2.246.19403.

Keesing, R. M. (1992). Anthropology and linguistics. In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday (pp. 593–609). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.61.45kee.

Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connection between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008.

Lakoff, G. (1987). A cognitive theory of metaphor. Philosophical Review, 96(4), 589–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185396

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. I). Stanford University Press.

Lonner, W. J. (1985). Issues in testing and assessment in cross-cultural counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000085134004.

Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620843.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.

McClelland, D. C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20(5), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022225.

McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience (Vol. 95). Irvington Publishers.

McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-97516-000.

McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690.

Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 34(2), 289–306.

Navracsics, J. (2002). Bilingual semantic representation and lexical access. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 49(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.49.2002.2.3.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291.

Opitz, B., & Degner, J. (2012). Emotionality in a second language: It’s a matter of time. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1961–1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.021.

Owa, M. (2024). Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): Meaning, use cases, pros & cons. Formplus. Retrieved from https://www.formpl.us/blog/thematic-apperception-tests-meaning-use-cases-pros-cons.

Pavlenko, A. (1997). Bilingualism and cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.

Pavlenko, A. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to the study of social factors in second language learning and use. In Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 275–294). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595851-013.

Pavlenko, A. (2008). Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003283.

Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Pennebaker Conglomerates. Retrieved November 19, 2022, from https://www.liwc.net.

Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Booth, R. J., Ashokkumar, A., & Francis, M. E. (2022). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC-22. Pennebaker Conglomerates. https://www.liwc.app.

Perez-Palen, M. (2022). The influence of language on Thematic Apperception Test assessment of defenses in international Spanish-speaking college students. Master’s thesis, University of Houston.

Phares, E. J. (1961). TAT performance as a function of anxiety and coping-avoiding behavior. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25(3), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040516.

Sachs, O. S., & Coley, J. D. (2006). Envy and jealousy in Russian and English: Labeling and conceptualization of emotions by monolinguals and bilinguals. In Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (Vol. 56, pp. 209–220). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598746-010.

Schüler, J., Baumann, N., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Baum, I. (2019). Implicit motives and basic psychological needs. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12431.

Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2001). Assessment of implicit motives with a research version of the TAT: Picture profiles, gender differences, and relations to other personality measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7701_05.

Schultheiss, O. C., Jones, N., & Kley, C. (2004). [Effects of incongruence between implicit motives and personal goals on depressive symptoms] (Unpublished raw data).

Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). The Guilford Press.

Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Waugh, C. E., Stanton, S. J., Meier, E. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2008). Exploring the motivational brain: Effects of implicit power motivation on brain activation in response to facial expressions of emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn030

Schultheiss, O., & Brunstein, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). Implicit motives. Oxford University Press.

Schultheiss, O. C., & Köllner, M. G. (2021). Implicit motives. In O. P. John & R. W. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed., pp. 385–410). The Guilford Press.

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.

Sudarsana, G., & Suarni, N. (2022). Analysis of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) to identify student self-endurance. Bisma: The Journal of Counseling, 6(1), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v6i1.52138.

Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676.

Todorova, I. L., Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. (2008). Changing stories: The evolving narratives of immigrant children. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 12(4), 345–367.

Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism‐collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169.

Von Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 40–53). Georgetown University Press.

Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. (4th ed.). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-10-01

إصدار

القسم

اللغات الأجنبية

كيفية الاقتباس

Naji, A., & Navracsics, J. (2026). تحليل للدوافع الضمنية بين ثقافات مختلفة في السرد المكتوب ردّاً على اختبار إدراك الموضوع (TAT) : دراسة باستخدام نظرية القابلية الدافعية وأداة اللغة LIWC-22. دراسات: العلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية, 54(1), 12057. https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.12057