The Effect of a Proposed Instructional Program Based on the Multiple Intelligences Theory on EFL Jordanian Ninth-Grade Students’ Achievement in English

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v50i3.2320

Keywords:

EFL, English Language Achievement, Instructional Program, Jordan, Multiple Intelligences, Ninth Grade

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of a proposed instructional program based on Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT) on ninth grade students’ achievement in English.

Methods: The participants of the study consisted of 40 students in two sections who were randomly assigned to a control group (20 students) and to an experimental group (20 students). One research instrument was used to collect the data of the study; a comprehensive English achievement test of reading, writing, listening and speaking. Data were analysed using means, standard deviations, ANCOVA and MANCOVA.

Results: The findings of the study indicated that there was a statistically significant difference (α=0.05) between the mean score of the students of the experimental group who were taught according to the (MIT) program and that the mean score of the control group who were taught based on the conventional method. This difference was in favour of the experimental group students since the adjusted mean score was (55.20), which was higher than the adjusted mean score of the control group (46.45).

Conclusions: The proposed instructional program based on (MIT) was significantly more effective than the conventional method in developing students’ English language skills. The study recommends that (MIT) should be incorporated in English as a foreign language (EFL) curricula in Jordan to improve students’ English language skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Minshar, M.(2016).The Effect of an Instructional Program Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory on the Basic Stage Students’ Achievement in English.HU research Journal. 11(1),204-218

Adams, B. (2004). Digital Intelligence Fostered by Technology. Journal of Technology Studies, 30(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v30i2.a.5.

Ahmed, A., & Gasm, A. (2012). The relation between multiple intelligences theory and methods of ELT. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 26-41.

Al-Ghazu, T., Baniabdelrahman, A., & Sadi, I. (2022). The Effect of an Instructional Program Based on Multiple Intelligences on Jordanian EFL Students’ Speaking Skills. Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 3(3), 31-41.‏

Alilateh, A., & Widyantoro, A. (2019). The effectiveness of using multiple intelligence activities in listening comprehension and improving students' interest. LingTera, 6(2), 111-118.‏

Al Maharma, H. (2021). Analysis of the activities used in English textbooks regarding the multiple intelligences theory in Jordan. Educational Research and Reviews, 16(10), 400-406.‏

Al-Omari, T., Bataineh, R., & Smadi, O. (2015). Potential inclusion of multiple intelligences in Jordanian EFL textbooks: A content analysis. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 8(1), 60-80.‏

Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Ascd.‏

Campbell, L., & Campbell, B. (1999). Multiple intelligences and student achievement: Success stories from six schools. ASCD.‏

Dastgeer, G., & Afzal, M. (2015). Improving English writing skill: A case of problem-based learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(10), 1315-1319.‏

Estaji, M., & Nafisi, M. (2014). Multiple intelligences and their representation in the EFL young learners’ textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(6), 61-72.‏

Fleetham, M. (2006). Multiple intelligences in practice: Enhancing self-esteem and learning in the classroom. A&C Black.‏

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic books.

Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Hachette UK.

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (2016). Intelligence isn’t black and white: There are 8 different kinds. Big Think.

Gündüz, Z., & Ünal, I. (2016). Effects of Multiple Intelligences Activities on Writing Skill Development in an EFL Context. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1687-1697.‏

Jallad, N., & Abdelrahman, A. (2008). The effect of multiple intelligences strategies on EFL ninth graders' achievement in reading comprehension. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1-2),87+.

Kırkgöz, Y. (2010). Catering for multiple intelligences in locally-published ELT textbooks in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 127-130.‏

Luo, S. (2018). Multiple Intelligences. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-8.‏

Omari, H. (2018). Analysis of the types of classroom questions which Jordanian English language teachers ask. Modern Applied Science, 12(4), 1-12.‏

Paris, V. (2013). Action pack: Teacher`s Book 9. Dar Al Tarbawiyoun House of Education Ltd and Pearson Education Ltd.

Rakedzon, T., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). To make a long story short: A scale for assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills. Assessing Writing, 32, 28-42.

Rizqiningsih, S., & Hadi, M.(2019). Multiple Intelligences (MI) on Developing Speaking Skills. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 1(2), 127-136.‏

Salih, P. M. (2015). The impact of adapted multiple intelligences activities on English speaking skills of Kurdish learners (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral dissertation, Master’s thesis, Near East University]. Near East University Grand Library).

Taase, Y. (2012). Multiple Intelligences Theory and Iranian Textbooks: An Analysis. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 73-82.‏

Downloads

Published

2023-10-22

How to Cite

Al-Abdallat, Z. M. ., & Al-Omari, H. A. . (2023). The Effect of a Proposed Instructional Program Based on the Multiple Intelligences Theory on EFL Jordanian Ninth-Grade Students’ Achievement in English. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 50(3), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v50i3.2320

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2022-09-15
Accepted 2022-11-16
Published 2023-10-22