Criminal Liability of Illegal Actions of Artificial Intelligence Entities

Authors

  • Mamdouh Hassan AL - Adwan Department of Comparative Law, Faculty of Sheikh Nouh Al-Qudah, The World of Islamic Sciences and Education University, Jordan.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence entities, criminal liability, probabilistic intent, direct liability, criminal behavior

Abstract

The study aims to demonstrate criminal liability for criminal acts committed by AI entities, the legal adaptation of crimes committed by AI entities, determining who is criminally responsible for them, and stating models of possible criminal liability for crimes of AI entities. To achieve the objective of the study, the researcher used the analytical approach to reach solutions to the problem of the study, and answer its questions by analyzing the general provisions of criminal liability for crimes of artificial intelligence entities, and showing the extent of their applicability to criminal acts. The current study concluded that artificial intelligence entities are based on understanding the nature of human intelligence by creating computer programs capable of simulating human behavior. Many crimes are expected to be committed by the entities of artificial intelligence. The characteristics will collide with the requirements of proving criminal responsibility for such crimes. Accordingly, it is imperative to work on developing a legal framework that regulates the work of artificial intelligence entities and the areas of their use to avoid any criminal acts and to develop legal solutions. This is to protect society from the potential dangers inherent in technologies that are not subject to the law, especially the criminal law to clearly define criminal responsibility for criminal acts, carried out by artificial intelligence entities..

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akerkar, R. (2019). Machine Learning in Artificial Intelligence for Business. Cham Springer: Springer Briefs in Business..

Almonte, C. (2015). AVERNA Vision & Robotics. New York: United States District Court.

Barfield, W., and Pagallo, U. (2018). Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bouchoux‏, D. (2021). A Practical Introduction to Paralegal Studies: Strategies for Success. (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

Core, E. (2001). Institutions of the laws of England-third. (6th ed.)

Goeldner, M., Herstatt, C., & Tietze, F. (2015). The emergence of care robotics—A patent and publication analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 115-131.‏

Harasimiuk‏, D., and Rademacher, T. (2021). Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Binary Ethics and the Law.

Human Control on Social Behavior is the Purpose of Criminal Law. See also Davida A. Williams, Note, Punishing the Faithful: Freud, Religion, and the Law, 24 CARDOZO L. REV. 2181 (citing WAYNE R. LAFAVE & AUSTIN W. SCOTT, JR., CRIMINAL LAW 22 (2nd ed. 1986).

Jelonek, D., Mesjasz-Lech, A., Stepniak, C., and Ziora, T. (2019). The Artificial Intelligence Application in the Management of Contemporary Organization: Theoretical Assumptions. Cham: Springer.

Lawrence, S. (1992). Legal Personhood for artificial intelligences. N. Carolina L. Rev., 70, 1231.‏

Lootah, W., and Miailhe, N. (2017). Dubai’s Artificial Intelligence Roadmap. The Journey so Far Interview of Wesam Lootah by Nicolas Miailhe Special, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in the City.

McCarty, Th. (1977).Reflections on Taxman: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. Donald E. Elliott.

Perkins, R. M. (1977). Knowledge as a Mens Rea Requirement. Hastings LJ, 29, 953.‏

Power, S. (1983). Crime and mystificationز Brent Fisse & John Accountability.

Quattrocolo, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence, Computational Modelling and Criminal Proceedings: A Framework for A European Legal Discussion (Vol. 4). Springer Nature.‏

Sivasubramauiam, L. (2007). Artificial Intelligence, or AI For short, is a Combination of Computer Science, Physiology, and philosophy.

Solon, O. (2015). Building Industrial Robots That Don’t Kill Humans. Claims Journal. www.claimsjournal.com.

SZ DJI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and DJI EUROPE B.V. (2018). AUTEL ROBOTICS USA LLC and AUTEL AERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO. United States District Court: D. Delaware.

The facts above are based on the overview in Yeuh-Hsuan Weng, Chien-Hsun Chen & Chuen-Tsai Sun (2009). Toward the Human-Robot Co-Existence Society: On Safety Intelligence for Next Generation Robots.

Walton‏, D. (2005). Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law. Springer International Publishing.

WENG, Y., SUGAHARA, Y., and HASHIMOTO, K. (2015). Atsuo TAKANISHI, Intersection of “TOKKU’ Special Zone, Robots, and the Law: A Case Study on Legal Impacts to Humanoid Robots. International Journal of social Robotics.

YASKAWA AMERICA, INC. (2015). MOTOMAN ROBOTICS DIVISION vs. INTELLIGENT MACHINE SOLUTIONS, INC. Ohio: United States District Court, S.D., and Dayton: Western Division.

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

AL - Adwan, M. H. (2021). Criminal Liability of Illegal Actions of Artificial Intelligence Entities. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 48(4), 128–141. Retrieved from http://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Law/article/view/3220

Issue

Section

Articles