تفسير آیة الإكراه من سورة النحل: دراسة تحليلية

Ibtihaj Radi  Abdul Rahman

doi:10.35516/law.v51i1.4637

Authors

Ibtihaj Radi Abdul Rahman Department of Quranic recitations and studies, Faculty of Da’wah and Fundamentals of Religion (Usul Addin), The World Islamic Sciences and Education Univestiy, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-3422

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v51i1.4637

Keywords:

The limit of coercion, interpretation of verse (except him who is forced), permission and determination

Abstract

Objectives: This research explores the ruling of uttering words of apostatsy and the relevant factors, such as willingness, coercion, dispensation, and obligation. It also investigates what actions are considered permissible when coercion is involved with examples of this in our contemporary reality.

Methods: The study uses inductive and analytical approaches to examine a verse from Surat al-Nahl, which is referred to here as “the verse of forced opostasy” that is pertinent to the topic of the current study. The deductive approach was also used to present the relevant statements of Fuqaha (jurists), highlighting the most suitable and appropriate in dealing with legally competent, obligated Muslims.

Results: According to the study, Muslims may face difficult situations that prompt them to say or do things that do not rise to the level of disbelief or to act out of character. In Palestine, Iraq, and elsewhere, people are tortured in prisons and detention centers or threatened with death at military checkpoints. Thus, if forced to comply with an adversary's demands, one must evaluate the situation and decide.

Conclusions: The "forced apostasy verse" is relevant to modern times since Muslims can be coerced into saying or doing things that contradict their faith, such as being threatened to be crucified or bending the knee to a cross. In such cases and to avoid death, Muslims may condone acts of disbelief, such as the desecration of the Quran.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aidan, A. (1994). Al-Wajeez in Usul Al-Fiqh. Al-Risala Foundation.

Abdel-Baqi, M. (1981). The Indexed Dictionary of the Words of the Holy Qur’an. (2nd ed.). Dar Al-Fikr for Printing, Publishing and Distribution.

Abu Safia, F (1982). Coercion in Islamic Sharia. Al-Rasheed Press.

Al-Adhami, H. (2014). Al-Wajeez in the principles of jurisprudence and the history of legislation. (1st ed.). Al-Etimad Press.

Al-Alusi, S., (2001 AD), The Spirit of Meanings in the Interpretation of the Great Qur’an and the Seven Muthani. (1st ed.).. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiya.

Al-Andalusi, M. (1983).Interpretation of the Ocean Sea. (2nd ed.). Dar Al-Fikr for printing, publishing and distribution.

Al-Bayhaqi, A. (2003) The Great Sunnahs. (3rd ed.). Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiya..

Al-Brosawi, I.(2001). Interpretation of the spirit of the statement. (1st ed.). Dar Revival of Arab Heritage.

Al-Bukhari, M. (2009).Sahih Al-Bukhari.Dar Al-Jil.

Al-Bustani, S. (1980).Al-Wafi: Intermediate Dictionary of the Arabic Language. Library of Lebanon.

Al-Emadi, S. (n.d). Interpretation of Abi Al-Saud called Guidance of the Right Mind to the Ways of the Noble Qur’an. Dar Revival of Arab Heritage.

Al-Hakim, P. (1990), The Review on the Two Sahihs. (1st ed.). Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiya.

Al-Kasani, A. (1986). Bada'i Al-Sana'i fi Tartib Al-Sharia'i,. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Khudari, M. (1933). Fundamentals of Jurisprudence. (1st ed.). Dar Al-Maarifa.

Al-Moaini, M. (1985). Coercion and its impact on legal behavior. (1st ed.). Al-Zahraa Press.

Al-Qasimi, M. (1959). Al-Qasimi’s interpretation of the book “Mahasin Al-Ta’weel”. (1st ed.). Dar Ihya Al-Kutub Al-Arabiya.

Al-Qurtubi, M. (2004). Tafsir Al-Qurtubi(1st ed.). Dar Al-Kutub Al-Alami.

Al-Razi, F. (1998).The Great Interpretation. (3rd ed.). Dar Revival of Islamic Heritage.

Al-Saad, S. & Al-Otaibi, J. (2016). Evidence and evidence in auditing from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence. A comparative accounting jurisprudence study. King Abdulaziz University Journal, Islamic Economics, 29(3), 103-154.

Al-Sayes, S. (n.d). Interpretation of the Verses of Rulings, first-year course at the Faculty of Sharia, University of Jordan.

Al-Shatby, A. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat(1st ed.). Dar Ibn Affan.

Al-Tabari, J. (1997). Al-Tabari’s interpretation of Jami’ Al-Bayan on the Interpretation of Verses of the Qur’an. (1st ed.). Al-Dar Al-Shamiya.

Al-Taftazani, S. (1957). The technological allusion of the text of the text of the revision in Usul al-Fiqh. Muhammad Ali Sobeih and Sons Press in Al-Azhar.

Al-Zuhaili, W.(n.d). Islamic jurisprudence. Dar Alfakr.

Al-Zuhaili, W. (1991). The Enlightening Interpretation of Creed, Sharia and Methodology. (1st ed.). Dar Al-Fikr Al-Moasr.

Bahgat,P. (1998). The detailed syntax of the recited book of God. (2nd ed.). Dar Al-Fikr for Printing and Distribution.

Bukhari, P. (1890). Revealing Secrets on the Origins of Fakhr al-Islam al-Bazdawi. (1st ed.). The Ottoman Press Company.

El Shafei, M. (2003). The Mother. (2nd ed.). Dar Al-Fikr.

Hawa, S. (1985).The Basis of Interpretation. (1st ed.). Dar Al-Salam.

Ibn Ashour, M. (1984).Tafsir al-Tahrir wa al-Tanweer. The Tunisian Publishing House.

Ibn Katheer, E. (1981). Abbreviated Interpretation of Ibn Katheer.)(7th ed.). Dar Al-Qur’an Al-Kareem.

Ibn Majah, M. (2014). Sunan Ibn Majah. Dar Al-Taseel.

Khaled, M. (2000). Men Around the Messenger. Dar Al-Fikr.

Mokhtar, A., & Albaraka, J. (n.d). Publications in the Maqasid Al-Shari'ah. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah: GJAT, 6(2), 157-170.

Qutb, S. (1967). In the Shadows of the Qur’an. (5th ed.). Dar Revival of Arab Heritage.

Sabiq, S. (n.d). Sunnah jurisprudence. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Arabi.

Saleh, N. (2022). Achieving the Saying in the Interpretation of the Almighty's Saying (The Night of Fasting is Permitted for you…) (187: Baqarah). Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 49(2), 503-512.

Vinsink, A. (1978). The Key to the Treasures of the Sunnah. Dar Lahore.