The Role of Non-routine Problem-solving Skills in Predicting the Metacognitive Habits of Mathematics Teachers in Jordan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v50i2%20-S1.1262Keywords:
Solving non-routine math equations, metacognitive habits of mind, mathematics teachersAbstract
Objectives: This study aims to identify the role of solving non-routine mathematics equations in predicting the metacognitive habits of mathematics teachers in Jordan.
Methods: The study employed a descriptive analytical approach and was conducted with a sample of 87 eighth-grade mathematics teachers chosen using a systematic random methodology. Two tests were administered: the first assessed the skills of solving non-routine mathematical equations, and the second assessed the metacognitive habits.
Results: The results indicated that the skills of solving non-routine mathematical equations can predict the metacognitive habits of eighth-grade mathematics teachers. In addition, the study revealed that the sample's skill level in solving non-routine mathematical equations and their metacognitive habits were low.
Conclusions: The study recommends providing training to mathematics teachers on the skill of mathematical reasoning through the use of non-routine mathematical equations, presenting them as real-life problems. It is worth telling that this approach can contribute to the development of mathematics teachers' skills.
Downloads
References
Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum studies, 38(4), 389-411.
Beyer, B. (1998). Improving student thinking. The Clearing House, 71(5), 262-267.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00098659809602720 .
Cai, J., & Kenney, P. A. (2000). Fostering mathematical thinking through multiple solutions. Mathematics Teaching in the osami28@yahoo.comCosta, A., & Kallick. B. (2000). Discovering & Exploring Habits of Mind. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.). (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characteristics for success. ASCD.
Fisher, A. (2005). Thinking skills and admission to higher education. A special paper, commissioned by the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. and produced by Centre for Research in Critical Thinking, University of East Anglia. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/images/109736-thinking-skills-and-admission-to-higher-education.pdf.
Haydar, H. N., & Zolkower, B. A. (2009). Beginning teachers and non-routine problems: Mathematics lesson study group in urban context. In Proceedings of the Thirty First Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Huba, M., & Freed, J. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, MA: Al-lyn & Bacon.
Hulin, C., Netemeyer, R., & Cudeck, R. (2001). Can a reliability coefficient be too high? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1): 55-58.
Hurrell.D. P. (2021). Conceptual knowledge OR Procedural knowledge OR Conceptual knowledge AND Procedural knowledge:Why the conjunction is important for teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 57-71.
Katranci, Y. (2021). Metacognitive functions of solving routine and non-routine problems. University of South Florida M3 Center Publishing, 3(2021), 49.
Khoon, A. (2005). The Impact of Habits of Mind on Student'Achievement.(34)(on-Line) 47 (1) Available; File. http://hdl.handle.net/10497/591.
Langer, Á. I., Schmidt, C., Mayol, R., Díaz, M., Lecaros, J., Krogh, E., ... & Gaspar, P. A. (2017). The effect of a mindfulness-based intervention in cognitive functions and psychological well-being applied as an early intervention in schizophrenia and high-risk mental state in a Chilean sample: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 18(1), 1-9.
Ministry of Education Singapore. (2009). The Singapore Model Method for Learning Mathematics. Singapore: Marshall Covendis.
Miyoung, L. (2006). Designing metacognitive maps for web-based learning. Образовательные технологии и общество, 9(1), 344-348.
Mogari. D., & Lupahla. N. (2013). Mapping a group of Northern Namibian grade 12 learners’ algebraic non-routine problem solving skills. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1/2), 94-105.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2003). The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics Highlights 2003, National Assessment of Educational Progress. U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences.
Shawan, M., Osman, S., Salleh Abu, M. (2021). Difficulties in Solving Non-Routine Problems: Preliminary Analysis and Results. ASM Science Journal, 16, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2021.800.
Sugandi, A. I., Maya, R., & Hutajulu, M. (2019). Improving mathematical habits of mind prospective teachers using metacognitive approach. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1315, No. 1, p. 012030). IOP Publishing.
ULGER. T. K., & YAZGAN. Y. (2021). Non-Routine Problem-Posing Skills of Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 94, 147-168.
Usta, N. (2020). Evaluation of Preservice Teachers' Skills in Solving Non-Routine Mathematical Problems through Various Strategies. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(3), 362-383.
Wilson, J. (2001). Methodological Difficulties of Assessing Metacognition: A New Approach.
Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the modelling of mathematical metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25-48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dirasat: Educational Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2022-08-18
Published 2023-08-30
