The Levels of Types of Intelligence of Players of Judo National Team of Jordan

Authors

  • Jebreel Al-Odat Princess Alia University, Balqa Applied University, Jordan
  • Yousef Malkieh Ministry of Education, Jordan

Keywords:

Intelligence, multiple intelligences, players, judo

Abstract

The study aims to identify the levels of intelligence in players of judo national team of Jordan. In addition, the study aims to identify the differences in the level of some types of multiple intelligences in the players depending on the variables of category of the team and the qualification of the player at the age of training. Due to the suitability and nature of this study, the scale of ownership (2016) was used as a tool for the study. The measure consists of (52) items divided into five types of multiple intelligences, namely: motor, linguistic, spatial, personal, and social. After confirming the validity and reliability of this tool, information was collected from a sample of 28 players. The results of the study showed that the level of the most common types of intelligence among the players is kinetic intelligence with an average of arithmetic (4.50), followed by spatial intelligence with an average of (4.24), personal intelligence with an average of (4.13) and linguistic intelligence with an average of (3.99). The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the number of different types of intelligence in the national judo team in Jordan depending on qualification and age of training variables. The researchers recommended some programs to develop and enhance the intelligence of the players of the national judo team in Jordan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brualdi, A. (1996). Multiple Intelligence: Garndner Theory. Washington: ERIC elearning house on Asessment and Evaluation.

Chan, D. (2003). Multiple Intelligences and Perceived Self – Efficacy Among Chinese Secondary School Teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 23(5), 521-533.

Checklu, K. (1997). Teaching For Multiple Intelligence: A conversation With Howard Gardner. Educational Leadership.

Cutshall, L. (2003).The Effects of Student Multiple Intelligence preference on Integration of Earth Science Concepts and Knowledge within a Middle Grades Science Classroom. Unpublished MA thesis, Johnson Bible College.

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Book.

Gardner, H. (1991). Intelligence Reframed, Multiple Intelligences for the 21 st Century. New York: Basic books.

Gohlinghorst, N. & Wessels, B. (2001). Enhancing Student Achievement in Social Studies through the Use of Multiple Intelligences. Unpublished MA thesis, Saint Xavier University.

Rogalla, M., & Margison, J. (2004). Future Problem Solving Program Coaches Efficacy in Teaching For Successful Intelligence and Their Patterns Of Successful Behavior. Roeper Review, 26 (3) :175-177.

Sharlock, J. (2004). The Relationship Between Multiple Intelligence and the High School Student Athtete.

Shearer, B. (1997). Reliability Validity and Utility of a Multiple Intelligences Assessment for Career Planning. In The Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago , IL, August 15-19, 1-26.

Walters, J. (1992). Application of multiple intelligences research in alternative assessment. In Yahoo snd National Sympsium Application of multiple intelligences.

Published

2020-03-01

How to Cite

Al-Odat , J. ., & Malkieh , Y. . (2020). The Levels of Types of Intelligence of Players of Judo National Team of Jordan. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 47(1), 506–521. Retrieved from https://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/1873

Issue

Section

Articles