Metadiscourse in the Arabic Language Text Books of Primary Stage in Jordan

Authors

  • Mohammad Fu'ad Hawamdeh College of Education, Yarmouk University, Jordan
  • Ayat Mohammad Abu Shhab Rosary School, Jordan

Keywords:

Metadiscourse, Arabic language books, Sequence

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the classifications of metadiscourse and its types in the Arabic language books in the primary stage. It also aimed to uncover the level of its sequence in the Arabic language books. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher prepared the analysis tool and the validity of the tool and its stability were extracted. The study also adopted the sentence as a unit to analyze the books used as a sample. A set of results were discovered, the most important of which is the development of a list of classifications of the metadiscourse which includes (15) different types of classifications of the meta-discourse. The first classification is the informational metadiscourse and IT included nine types. The second classification is the attitudinal metadiscourse which included six types. The third type is the communicative meta-discourse. Results also showed that Arabic language books for the fourth, fifth, and sixth grades included (3457) incidentes of the classifications of the metadiscourse which varied in their frequency. The study also discovered that the results of classifications of the metadiscourse and their types varied. Some of those classifications were either low included or not included. Results also showed that there is no consequence nor continuity in the results of the classifications of metadiscourse in the Arabic language books of the primary stage. On the basis of these findings, the study concludes with a set of recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, Philadelphia.

Al Fajari, M. (2013). The Concept of Discourse Between its Original and Western Origin Reference and Domestication in Arabic Language, Journal of Taibah University Arts & Humanities, 2(3), 514 – 531.

Al Rowaili, M. (1991). Metadiscourse Analysis of Geography Textbooks for Basic Education in Saudi Arabia, Journal of King Saud University :Educational Sciences, 3(2), 451 – 480.

Al Rowaili, M., & Al Jaber, A. (1991). Metadiscourse: Metadiscourse Analysis in Social Studies Text Books, Educational Studies, 6(31), 99 – 120.

Al Sayyed, M. (1998). In Methods of Teaching Arabic Language. Damascus: Damascus University Publication.

Al Zawawi, B. (2000). The Concept of Discourse in Michel Foucault Philosophy. Cairo: Supreme Council Of Culture.

Ammar, M. (2016). The Role of Arabic School Textbooks in Improving and Developing the Arabic Language in Algeria, Al Hekmah Journal for Educational and Physiological Studies, 4 ( 8 ), 250 – 264.

Anati, W. (2017). Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching, The UMM Al-QURA University Journal of Arabic Languages and Literature, 18, 351-400.

Crismore, A. (1984).The Rhetoric of Textbooks Metadiscourse, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16 (3), 279 -296.

Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students, Written Communication, 10(1), 39- 71.

Fowler, R.(2013). Linguistics and the Novel. London: Routledge.

Hanfi, H. (1997). Discourse Analysis, The Third Scientific Conference 10– 12 May, Philadelphia University, Amman.

Holsti, O .(1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. New York: Addison Wesley.

Husni, H. (2015). Metadiscourse at Thesis Defense Department in Arabic, English and Linguistic researches: Contrastive Linguistic Study, Unpublished dissertation, Al Fayoum University, Egypt.

Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in Introductory Coursebooks, English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3-26.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?. Journal of pragmatics, 113, 16-29.‏

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal, Applied linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.

Hyland, K., (2004). Patterns of Engagement: Dialogic Features and L2 Student Writing. In: Ravelli, L. and Ellis, R. (eds.) Analysing academic writing: contextualised framewo. (pp. 5-23). Continuum: London.

Jam’an, A. (2016). From Discourse Analysis to Critical Discourse Analysis: Methods and Theories. Amman: Dar Konouz Al Ma’refa.

Jarunud, S. (1986). An Analysis of Metadiscourse in Thai Social Studies Textbooks in Secondary schools, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.

Jin, X., & Shang ,Y.(2016). Analyzing Metadiscourse in the English Abstracts of BA Theses, Journal of language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 210-215.

Khattabi, M. (1991). Text Linguistic: An Introduction to Discourse Coherence. Beirut: Markaz Thakafi Arabi.

Kopple,V. (1985). Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewandowsk, T. (1994) .Linguistisches Woertrbuch. Berlin: Quelle & Meyer.

Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfort is main: peter Lang publisher.

Myers, G. (1990).Writing Biology: Text in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin press.

Olaymat, A. (2006). Evaluating and Developing School Textbooks for the Elementary Stage. Amman: Dar Al Hamid.

Parvaresh, V., & Nemati, M. (2008). Metadiscourse and Reading Comprehension: The Effects of language and Proficiency, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 220-239.

Qasim, A. (2016). Metadiscourse Markers in Advanced EFL learners Academic Writing, Hawlyat Al Montada, 1(28), 19-38.

Shiffrin, D. (1980). Meta‐Talk: Organizational and Evaluative Brackets in Discourse, Sociological Inquiry, 50(3), 199-236.

Sultan, A. H. (2011). A contrastive study of metadiscourse in English and Arabic linguistics research articles. Acta Linguistica, 5(1), 28.‏

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tan, H., & Eng, W. (2014). Metadiscourse Use in the Persuasive Writing of Malaysian Undergraduate Students. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 26-38.

Tavakoli, M., Dabaghi, A., & Khorvash, Z. (2010). The effect of Metadiscourse Awareness on L2 Reading Comprehension: A Case of Iranian EFL learners, English Language Teaching, 3, 92-102.

Tuaimah, R. (2015). Teaching Arabic to non-native speakers. Morocco: Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Vanderweken, P. (1990). Meaning and Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2020-12-01

How to Cite

Hawamdeh, M. F. ., & Abu Shhab , A. M. . (2020). Metadiscourse in the Arabic Language Text Books of Primary Stage in Jordan. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 47(4), 28–43. Retrieved from https://dsr.ju.edu.jo/djournals/index.php/Edu/article/view/2435

Issue

Section

Articles