Evaluating Science Curriculum for the Second Grade from the Perspective of their Teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v50i3.3203

Keywords:

Evaluation, science curriculum, second grade, second-grade teachers

Abstract

Objectives: This research aims to evaluate the science curriculum from the perspective of second-grade teachers.

Methods: The research used the descriptive and analytical approach as the research nature dictates. The research sample consisted of (100) female teachers from the public schools affiliated with Sahab and Zarqa for the academic year (2021-2022). A questionnaire that contained 104 aspects was conducted and it dealt with six scopes: educational objectives, educational stages objectives, school materials and vocabulary, school book contents, other supplementary activities, information technology, and communication and teaching methods.

Results: The research results revealed that the field of supplementary activities ranked first with an arithmetic mean and a standard deviation of (30.57±4.78), while the field of teaching methods came in second place with an arithmetic mean of (30.50±3.96), and the last rank went to the field of subjects’ objectives and vocabulary with an arithmetic mean of (21.12±1.08), the arithmetic mean of the estimates of the research sample on evaluating the science curriculum for the second grade total was (27.89±3.83). The results of the research also showed that there were no statistically significant differences at the level of (a=0.05) between the average estimates of the research sample in the fields of study due to the variable of experience.

Conclusions: The research suggests diversifying science curriculum activities to accommodate individual differences and student attitudes. Additionally, it recommends incorporating the concept of the knowledge economy and applying its principles in the curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdal-Salam, A., Qarni, Z., Abu al-Ezz, A., & Abu Shama, M. (2007). A model A proposal to develop the science curriculum in primary education in the light of project requirements Timss. Eleventh Scientific Conference Where to Scientific Education Egypt, Cairo.

Abdel-Maguid, M. (2004). The extent to which the content of the science curriculum in the preparatory stage deals with the dimensions of nature Science, its processes, and students' understanding of it. Scientific Education Egypt, 7 ,103-144.

Ahmed, H.(2007). Analysis and evaluation of the family science curriculum for the first and second grades of secondary school in Sudan. Unpublished master's thesis, Om Radman Islamic University, Sudan.

Al-Asaqa, H. (2015). A proposed evaluation model for examining the quality of the science curriculum for the fifth grade of primary school in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Jordan, Jordan.

Atallah, M. (2001). Methods and methods of teaching science. (1st ed.). Amman: Dar Al Masirah for publication and distribution and print.

Al-Badu, E. (2013). Evaluation of the vocational education curricula for the upper basic stage from the viewpoint of vocational education teachers in the schools of the Capital Governorate. Educational Sciences, 40, 619-633.

Bakhitan, S. (2006). Evaluation of the New Palestinian Science Curriculum for the basic stage from the point of view of supervisors and teachers of public schools in the northern governorates of the West Bank. Unpublished master's thesis, AnNajah National University, Palestine.

Bybee, J., & Powel, L. (2010). Basic Goals of Science Education. (1st ed.). Trowbridge: Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall.

Dahman, M. (2014). Analysis of the content of science books for grades (5-8) in Palestine in the light of Timss test requirements. Unpublished master's thesis, Al-Azhar University, Palestine.

Al-Ghamdi, M. (2012). Evaluation of the content of science books developed in the lower grades of the stage Primary in the light of selected criteria. Unpublished master's thesis, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

Al-Hadabi, D., & Al-Refai, A. (2005). Evaluation of the science curriculum for the first grade of basic education, according to developed standards. Social Studies, 10, 139-181.

Hakami, M. (2008). Evaluating the content of science curricula at the primary stage in light of the requirements of culture Scientific. Unpublished master's thesis, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.

Mohamed, S. (2008). The extent to which the science book for the eighth grade meets the standards of the science curriculum the new ones in accordance with the general framework of curricula and assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, university of Jordanian, Jordan.

Al-Muqram, S. (2001). Methods of teaching science principles and objectives. (1st ed.). Amman: Al-Shorouk Publishing House and distribution.

Al-Najdi, A., Al-Hadi, M., & Rashid, A. (2003). Modern methods, methods and strategies in Science teaching. (1st ed.). Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi.

Odeh, T., & Al-Saadani, A.(2006). An introduction to teaching science. (1st ed.). Cairo: Dar Al-Kitab the talk.

Al-Samarrai, N. (2012). Modern strategies in teaching methods of science physics chemistry Biology. (1st ed.). Amman: Dar Al-Manhaj for publication and distribution.

Al-Sayeh, A., & Hani, M. (2009). Evaluating the Science Curriculum in the Preparatory Stage in the Light of Some Concepts of Nanotechnology. Twenty-First Scientific Conference, Developing Curricula between Tradition and Contemporaryness. Cairo.

Sbitan, F. (2010). Fundamentals and methods of teaching science. (1st ed.). Amman: Dar Al-Janadriyah for publication and distribution.

Al-Zoubi, M. (2002). The art education curriculum for basic schools in Jordan is evaluated in the light of his goals. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-23

How to Cite

Al-Deeri, T. A. . (2023). Evaluating Science Curriculum for the Second Grade from the Perspective of their Teachers. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 50(3), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v50i3.3203

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2022-12-03
Accepted 2023-03-06
Published 2023-10-23