Level of Psychological Resilience during the Outbreak of the Coronavirus in Jordan

Mohammad  M. Baniyounes; Munira  Akramovna; Venera  R. Algushaeva

doi:10.35516/hum.v49i4.2081

Authors

Mohammad M. Baniyounes The University of Jordan
Munira Akramovna Bashkir State University
Venera R. Algushaeva Bashkir State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i4.2081

Keywords:

Psychological, resilience, coronavirus, demographic, variables, neuro-psychological hormonal immunity, perception

Abstract

The current study aimed to identify the differences in the levels of psychological resilience dimensions during the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic with an available sample of (337) male and female respondents in Jordan. In order to achieve this goal, the Connor – Davidson psychological resilience scale (CD – RISK) applied in online survey in Jordan from (27/ 8 -10/9/2020). After completing the application of the scale, data were collected and statistically analyzed after analyzing the study data. The results show the following: Having low levels of four dimensions of psychological resilience personal competence, Trust in one’s instincts, positive acceptance of change, personal control and a high level of the spiritual dimension of psychological resilience. The personae of statistically significant differences according to gender in the level’s dimensions personal competence, trust in one’s instincts, spiritual influences toward males, and significant differences in the level of dimension (positive acceptance of change) towards females. There were no statistically significant differences in the level of dimension (personal control) according to gender. The presence of statistically significant differences in the level of dimension (positive acceptance of change ) toward people without chronic diseases , and the absence of statistically significant differences in the level of the remaining four dimensions of psychological resilience according to the presence of chronic diseases. The presence of statistically significant differences according to the age group in the level of dimension (positive acceptance of change ) toward the younger age group (25-40) years and the absence of a statistically significant differences in the remaining four dimensions of psychological resilience. Based on results, the study recommends the necessity to improve levels of the dimensions of psychological resilience through periodic training courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burcu karaúar & derya canlı(2020). Psychological resilience and depression during the covid-19 pandemic in turkey Psychiatria Danubina, 32(2), 273-279 274 . https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Derya-Canli-2/public

Connor, M., Davidson, R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor – Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISK): Depression and Anxiety,18 (2), 76 – 82.

Elien, J., B. (2007). Emotions and Feelings, Peter's House, Moscow, (2nd), Russia.

Eliian, J., B. (2015). The Psychology of Hope: Optimism and Pessimism, Peter's House, Moscow, Russia

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River https://www.scirp.org/(S(lz5mqp453edsnp55rrgjct55))/refe

Masten S., & Monn, R. (2015). Child and family resilience: A Call for integrated Science, practice, and professional training, family Relations, 64 (1), 5-21.

Moritz Petzold, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32633464

Richardson, E. (2002). The Meta theory of resilience and resiliency, Journal of clinical psychology .58 (3), 307 – 321.

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon

Vanessian, A., X. (2018). Formation of resistance to pressure among students, European Fund for Innovative Development, Moscow, Russia.