Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities between Internal law and International Law (Comparative Study)

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed, through an understanding of diplomatic immunities and privileges in the context of the relationship between domestic law and international law, to explain the commitment of states to international law in order to achieve their interests, which is not considered an encroachment on the sovereignty of the state.

Methods: The study used the legal, systems and comparative methods to answer the questions and test the hypothesis, on the basis that the hypothesis says that there is a correlation between diplomatic immunities and privileges and sovereignty.

Results: The study showed that the international immunities and privileges occupy one of the most important advanced position for the existing lawsuits between the Juridical, legal political disputes, and the social and serenity importance. Many studies and elaborations have addressed this issue and introduced different theories, that creates packages of legal disputes on the background of the sovereignty concepts,security, stability and independence from one side, and on the other side, the states international obligations, and its interest to live peacefully and cooperating with other countries.

Conclusion: The study concluded that immunizing the diplomatic envoy from judicial accountability and exempting him from sanctions is the basis of diplomatic immunities and privileges. The issue the state gives up some of its sovereignty becomes a matter of interest and scrutiny. Therefore, international law hastened in light of the growing relations to explain these immunities and privileges and assign them to Legal grounds agreed upon by states that require more cooperation and disregard for absolute sovereignty.