A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Oath Terms Used by Jordanian Youths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i4.832Keywords:
Oath terms, social differences, Jordanian communityAbstract
Objectives: The aim of the study is to investigate oath terms used by Jordanians in relation to different variables, such as gender and situation. The terms are analyzed based on their thematic associations concerning the two variables of gender (speaker and hearer) and situation (formal and informal), where the speaker is of a similar status in the informal situation and of a higher status in the formal one.
Methods: The data was collected through a Data Completion Task (DCT) involving 50 Jordanian university students as respondents. The questionnaire was analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively, with the significance difference calculated at (α=0.08).
Results: The study found that religious terms are the most frequent in all cases, suggesting that changing the variables does not significantly influence their frequency. On the other hand, other categories of swearing terms are culturally bound and are influenced by the social variables of gender and situation in the Jordanian context.
Conclusions: Future research may focus on exploring other social variables that could influence the usage of oath terms, such as various age groups and levels of education. Additionally, the study could be expanded as a contrastive analysis, comparing the terms used by individuals from different languages and cultural backgrounds.
Downloads
References
Abdalla, A. (2018). A Linguistic Investigation of the Purposes, Forms and Meanings of Swearing by God in Arabic: A Case Study of Saudis Indigenous to the Province of Taif, KSA. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 8, 1.
Abdel-jawad, H. (2000). A Linguistic and Sociopragmatic and Cultural Study of Swearing in Arabic. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 217-240.
Aliakbari, M., & et. al. (2013). A Sociolinguistics Study of Conversational Swearing in Iran. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(3), 42-59.
Binmsayoud, Sh. (2013). Oslub Alqasam fi Allugha Alarabiyya wa Tarjamatuhu Lilfaransiyya. MA Thesis, Qusantina University, Algeria.
Delia, J. G. (1987). Communication research: A history. Handbook of communication science, 20-98.
De Bruin, B. (2016). Pledging Integrity: Oaths as Forms of Business Ethics Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 23-42.
Echols, E. (1980). Sacra ac profane: The art of swearing in Latin. American Scholar,49, 111-14.
Ibn-Khalawayh, A. (1985). I'raab thalaatheen Soura min Alquraan Alkareem. Dar Alhelal: Beirut, Lebanon.
Kaplan, K. (2018). Still More gender Differences are Identified. http://blogs.nature.com/naturejobs/2018/01/15/still-more-gender-differences-are-identified/.
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205-54.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2, 45-80.
Leslie, T. (2002). The Theatrical rhetoric of Edward III. Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England, 15, 43-56.
McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. Routledge, London.
Sharp, K. (1979). Oaths. The Truth Magazine, 28, 453-455. http://www.truthmagazine.com/archives/volume23/TM023180.html.
Simpson, J., & Edmund, W. (2010). The Oxford English Dictionary. (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Thayer, J. (1996). A Greek English Lexicon of the new Testament. Hendrickson Publishers: Cambridge Massachusetts.
Ted, O. (2007). Why isn't 'Yes' enough?. Christianity Today. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/march/20.24.html.
Yetkiner, K. (2004). Assertiveness and Sincerity.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2022-06-16
Published 2023-07-30
