أثر استخدام السبورة التفاعلية كأداة تعليمية في تحصيل طلبة الصف الحادي عشر في مادة الفيزياء واتجاهاتهم نحوها

Abdellateef  Alqawasmi; Najeh Rajeh   Alsalhi; Khaleel  Alarabi; Suzan  Alabidi

doi:10.35516/hum.v51i1.951

Authors

Abdellateef Alqawasmi Postgraduate Professional Diploma in Teaching Program, College of Education, Al Ain University, Al Ain, UAE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-131X
Najeh Rajeh Alsalhi Department of Education,College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8807-4527
Khaleel Alarabi Postgraduate Professional Diploma in Teaching Program, College of Education, Al Ain University, Al Ain, UAE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-8281
Suzan Alabidi Postgraduate Professional Diploma in Teaching Program, College of Education, Al Ain University, Al Ain, UAE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0211-9198

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i1.951

Keywords:

Interactive board, achievement, eleventh grade students, attitudes, physics

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of the interactive board (IB) as an educational instrument on 11th Grade Students’ achievement in physics and their attitudes towards its use.

Methods: The study was conducted using a quasi-experimental design case study. The researchers used an achievement test as well as an attitude survey consisting of (23) IB-relevant items covering three domains: student involvement and motivation, learning and teaching, and interactive board limitations. The study sample comprised (63) purposefully selected eleventh-grade students’ (31 students as a control group and 32 as an experimental group) from the first term of the scholastic year 2021-2022.

Results: The study results showed that the students in the experimental group who were taught using the interactive board outperformed the students in the control group who were taught using the traditional board in terms of academic achievement. The results also revealed positive attitudes among students towards the interactive board.

Conclusions: The use of interactive board as a teaching tool has a positive effect on increasing students' achievement in physics, in addition to their acceptance of its use. As a result, the study recommends conducting further research on the use of interactive board across different school levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alarabi, K., & Wardat, Y. (2021). UAE-based Teachers’ Hindsight Judgments on Physics Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(3), 2497-2511.

Alzoubi, A. A. S. (2021). The Effect of Using the Interactive Whiteboard on the Academic Achievement of Sixth-Graders in the Subject of Geography in the Schools of Bani-Kenana District in Jordan. Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Educational & Psychological Research & Studies, 12(36), 32.

Brandon, B. I. L. L. (2004). Applying instructional systems processes to constructivist learning environments. The eLearning Guild, 6(29).

Becta, A. (2003). What research says about interactive whiteboards.

Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning, and technology: A report on 10 years of ACOT research.

Emron, S., & Dhindsa, H. (2010). Integration Of Interactive Whiteboard Technology To Improve Secondary Science Teaching And Learning. International Journal for Research in Education (IJRE), 28.

European Commission. (2008). Entrepreneurship in Higher Education, Especially Within Non-Business Studies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Gatlin, M. (2007). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on student achievement (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).

Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117.

Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools?

Isman, A., Abanmy, F. A., Hussein, H. B., Saadany, A., & Abdelrahman, M. (2012). Saudi Secondary School Teachers Attitudes' towards Using Interactive Whiteboard in Classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 286-296.

Karsenti, T. (2016). The interactive whiteboard: Uses, benefits, and challenges: A survey of 11,683 students and 1,131 teachers. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 42(5).

Lin, Y.(2010). The study of learning effects and attitude of using interactive whiteboard into angle unit of mathematics for fourth graders with different academic achievements. Master’s thesis, China.

Schnittka, C. G., & Bell, R. L. (2009). Preserves biology teachers’ use of interactive display systems to support reforms-based science instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 131-159.

Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.

Tairab, H., Al Arabi, K., Rabbani, L., & Hamad, S. (2020). Examining Grade 11 science students’ difficulties in learning about vector operations. Physics Education, 55(5), 055029.

van Veen, N., & van den Berg, E. (2012). Interactive white board in physics teaching: beneficial for physics achievement?. In Physics alive: Proceedings (pp. 155-160). University of Jyväskylä.

Walker, R. (2006). Teaching and learning with interactive board.

Morgan, G. L. (2008). Improving student engagement: Use of the interactive whiteboard as an instructional tool to improve engagement and behavior in the junior high school classroom. Liberty University.