Criminal Protection of Animal Life and Body Safety in the Jordanian Penal Law: A Comparative Study with the French Penal Law"

Authors

  • Saif Ibrahim Al-Masarweh School of Law, Mu’tah University, Jordan.
  • Amal Abdallah Abuanzeh School of Law, The University of Jordan, Jordan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v49i2.1520

Keywords:

Criminal protection, animal body safety, Jordanian penal law, French penal law.

Abstract

Objectives: The current study explores the scope of criminal protection for animal life and body safety in the Jordanian Penal Code and compares it with the French Penal Code.

Methods: To this end, this study adopts a comparative analytical descriptive approach by presenting the texts of the Jordanian Penal Code that address criminalizing the different forms of assault on animal life and body safety, analyzing and commenting on them to reveal how to confront these crimes. The study also compares these texts with the texts of the French Penal Code.

Results: The study shows that the Jordanian legislature’s approach tends to criminally protect pets and domestic animals by considering them property owned by others. In contrast, the French legislature is devoted to the protection of animals as living creatures with feelings. Moreover, the scope of this protection for the Jordanian legislature is limited to accommodate all forms of assault on animal life and the safety of its body, in addition to the weak penalties prescribed for criminal acts of assault.

Conclusions: The Jordanian legislature should reconsider the crimes of assault on animal life and the safety of its body as a living being that has feelings and criminalize unintentional killing and harming of the animal, and criminalize neglect, simple beating, and sexual assault on it. In addition, it is important to penalize the commencement of crimes of assaulting animal life and body safety with tougher penalties for these crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

English:

Al Husseini, O. (2000). Criminology. (3rd).

Al Majali, N. (2020). An Explanation of the Penal Code: General Section. (6th). Amman: Dar Al Thaqafah.

Al Mashhadany, M. (2001). An Explanation of Penal Code: Special Section in Positive Law and Islamic Sharia. (1st). Amman: Dar Al Elmiyah Al Dawliyah & Dar Al Thaqafah.

Al Saed, K. (2011). An Explanation of Penal Code: Offences Committed Against Human, A Comparative Study. (5th). Amman: Dar Al Thaqafah for publishing and distributing.

Al Shazly, F. (2001). An Explanation of Penal Code: General Section. (1st).

Benham., R. (1997). General Theory for Criminal Law. (3rd). Alexandria: Monchaat Al Maaref.

Bin Salem, I. (2020). Legal protection of animals in Accordance with the Algerian Penal Code. (1st). Berlin: Democratic Arab Center for Strategic, Political & Economic Studies.

Eleiwi, A., & Al Janabi, I. (2016). The objective criminal protection for the animalistic wealth in the penal code: a comparative study. Basic education college journal for educational and human sciences. University of Babylon , 2016(26), 505-518.

Husni, M. (1988). General Theory for Mens Rea. (3rd). Cairo: Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya.

Husni, M. (1989). An Explanation of the penal code: general section. (6th). Cairo: Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya.

Husni, M. (1992). Criminal Contribution of Arab Legislations. (6th). Cairo: Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya.

Ibn Manzur, J. (1993). Lisan Al Arab, (3rd). Beirut: Dar Sadir.

Nammor, M. (2021). Explanation of the penal code: special section. crimes against persons. (7th). Amman: Dar Al Thaqafah.

Said, M. (2016). Criminal Protection of Physical Integrity for the Animal Right, a Comparative Study of the Islamic Sharia and Positive Law. Journal of Alexandria University for Legal and Economic Research - Faculty of Law, 2(2), 477-602.

Suleiman, A. (2009). Protection Against Torture within the Framework of International and Regional Conventions. (1st). Beirut: AL-Halabi Legal Publications.

Tawfeeq, A. (2012). Penitentiary and Criminology. (1st). Amman: Dar Al Thaqafah.

French:

Antebi, R. (2019). L’état de nécessité, fait justificatif de l’atteinte à la vie animale: https://www.avocat-antebi.fr/avocat-droit-des-animaux/etat-necessite-fait-justificatif-atteinte-vie-animale/

Antebi, R. (2020). Mauvais traitements sur animaux & traditions locales:

Antebi, R. (2021).Protection pénale de l'animal et de la chose: https://www.avocat-antebi.fr/avocat-droit-des-animaux/protection-penale-de-animal-et-de-la-chose/

Antoine, S. (1994). Un animal est-il une chose ? Gaz. Pal. (1er sem.), doctr.

Boisseau-sowinski, L. (2020). Les limites à l’évolution de la considération juridique de l’animal: la difficile conciliation des intérêts de l’homme et de ceux des animaux. Tracés, 199-221: https://doi.org/10.4000/traces, 6276

Canselier, S. (2015). Les grands progrès de la protection animale en droit français et européen. Histoire de la recherche contemporaine, tome IV, n° 1 (Dossier) “ L’animal, enjeu de la recherche “, 54-58.

Danti-Juan, M. (1989). Les infractions se rapportant à l'animal en tant qu'être sensible. RD rur, 448- 453.

Desmoulin, S. (2006). Protection des animaux et condition juridique de l’animal en droit français», étude est tirée d’une these: « L’animal, entre Science et Droit », décembre 2005 à l’Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques. (57), 37 - 75;

Desmoulin, S. (2013). La sensibilité de l’animal en droit François: de la vigueur des mots à l’efficacité des sanctions: in T. Auffret van der Kemp et M. Lachance (dir.), Souffrance animale: de la science au droit, Editions Yvon Blais, 257-272.

Desmoulin, S. (2016). De la sensibilité à l’unicité: une nouvelle étape dans l’élaboration d’un statut sui generis pour l’animal ?: Note à propos de Civ.1, 9 décembre 2015, Recueil Dalloz, 360-364.

Falaise, M. (2020). Protection animale et bien-être animal: une prise en compte croissante par le législateur et le citoyen. AJ Collectivités Territoriales, 116- 120.

https://www.avocat-antebi.fr/avocat-droit-des-animaux/mauvais-traitements-animaux-traditions-locales/

Marguénaud, J-P. & alii, P. (2004). La protection juridique du lien d’affection envers un animal. Dalloz, Chron, 3009-3011.

Marguénaud, J-P. (1995). L'animal dans le nouveau code penal, Recueil Dalloz, 34-40.

Oosterom, S-Van. (2005). La protection de l’animal en droit francais», Animal legal & historical center, Michigan State University College of law. https://www.animallaw.info/article/la-protection-de-l%E2%80%99animal-en-droit-francais

REY, R.(1993).Histoire de Ici douleur, Éd. La Decouverte.

Tardy, V. (2017). Ineffectivité de la protection de l’animal par le droit pénal? https://www.ensemblepourlesanimaux.org/ project/ineffectivite-de-la-protection-de-lanimal-par-le-droit-penal/

Published

2022-06-01

How to Cite

Al-Masarweh س. ا., & Abuanzeh أ. ع. (2022). Criminal Protection of Animal Life and Body Safety in the Jordanian Penal Law: A Comparative Study with the French Penal Law". Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 49(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v49i2.1520

Issue

Section

Articles