مراجعة منهجية لمحاولة استنتاج النموذج الأفضل للقيادة التربوية لتطوير نظام التعليم في التربية الخاصة في المملكة العربية السعودية

Ohud Adnan A.  Saffar

doi:10.35516/edu.v51i3.6913

Authors

Ohud Adnan A. Saffar Department of Special Education, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-3517

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i3.6913

Keywords:

Systematic review, educational leadership models, education system in special education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to identify and apply the most commonly used models in the field of educational leadership for developing the educational system in special education. Additionally, it compared the application of these models in the educational system of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) with those in other countries worldwide, to prepare educational leaders in special education and keep pace with the global information revolution.

Methods A systematic review approach was used, relying on the analysis of previous studies. This study reviewed 23 studies.

Results: The results of the current study showed that no Arabic study has extracted an ideal model for use in educational leadership in special education. Moreover, the results showed that the most commonly used models are STEAM and EFQM, but few studies have employed these models in the field of special education. In addition, the results have shown that the models used help the educational leadership process go through several interconnected stages, enabling leaders to understand the needs of students in special education.

Conclusions: The study recommends intensifying the efforts of researchers to prepare joint studies between special education professionals and the field of educational leadership. Additionally, modern pedagogical models should be used in schools to develop and prepare educational leaders to adapt to students with disabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alangari, T. S. (2022). Online STEM education during COVID-19 period: A systematic review of perceptions in higher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), em2105.‏

Albagieh, M. N. (2018). Elementary School Principals' Perceptions of Their Level of Knowledge and Use of Leadership Practice Regarding Special Education in Riyadh School District, Saudi Arabia. ProQuest LLC.‏

Aldosari, H. M. (2015). The reality of Saudi Arabian experience in STEM education in light of the international experiences. In The First Excellence Conference in Science and Mathematics Education: STEM (Vol. 1, pp. 599-640).‏

Amro, R., & Al-kaylani, A. (2023).Need Assessment for Practicing Distrbited Leadership at Jordanian Public Universities. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 50(3), 1-17.‏

Avolio, B. J. & Yammarino F. J (2002). Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead, New York: Erlbaum.

Ayad, F. I., & Ajrami, S. J. (2017). The Degree of Implementing ISTE Standards in Technical Education Colleges of Palestine. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(2), 107-118.‏

Balbay, S. & Kilis, S. (2018). A comparative study of the educational system, teacher education and English language education of South Korea and Turkey. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 1-12.

Barcelona, K. (2014). 21 Century Curriculum Change Initiative: A Focus on STEAM Education as an Integrated Approach to Teaching and Learning. American Journal of Education Research. 2(10), 862-863.

Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sampler set. Redwood City, CA: Mind Goarden Publications.

Berisha, F., & Vula, E. (2021). Developing pre- service conceptualization of STEAM and STEAM Pedagogical practices, original research, Frontiers in Education.

Boy, G. (2015). From STEAM to STEAM: Toward a Human- Centered Education. Retrieved from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa.

Boyland, L. G., Geesa, R. L., Lowery, K. P., Quick, M. M., Mayes, R. D., Kim, J., ... & McDonald, K. M. (2019). Collaborative principal-school counselor preparation: National standards alignment to improve training between principals and school counselors. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 14(1), 188-205.‏

Coe, R., Waring, M., Hedges, L. V., & Ashley, L. D. (Eds.). (2021). Research methods and methodologies in education. Sage.‏

DeMatthews, D., Billingsley, B., McLeskey, J., & Sharma, U. (2020). Principal leadership for students with disabilities in effective inclusive schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 539-554.‏

Egan, S. (2003). Embracing Excellence. In Education, Sheffield Hallam University.

Grandian. A. (2016). Steam Education: A 21st century approach to learning. University of San diego: https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu.

Huang, B., Jong., M., Tu, Y., Hwang, G., Chai, Ch., Jiang, M. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEAM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Journal Computer and Education, ElSEVIER.

Liasidou, A., & Svensson, C. (2014). Educating leaders for social justice: The case of special educational needs co-ordinators. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(8), 783-797.‏

Lu, S. Y., Wu, C. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2022). Evaluation of disabled STEAM-students’ education learning outcomes and creativity under the UN sustainable development goal: project-based learning oriented STEAM curriculum with micro: bit. Sustainability, 14(2), 679.‏

Lytra, N., & Drigas, A. (2021). STEAM education-metacognition–Specific Learning Disabilities. Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(10)‏.

Margot, K., Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education.

National foundation for educational research. (2012). Strategic consultation on science, engineering and mathematics (Stem) for the education and training: https://2u.pw/w1xdh5 .

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al.(2020). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

Theoharis, G., & Causton, J. (2014). Leading inclusive reform for students with disabilities: A school-and systemwide approach. Theory Into Practice, 53(2), 82-97.‏

Yamasaki, H. (2016). Teachers and Teacher Education in Japan. Bull. Grad School Educ, Hiroshima University, 3(56), 19-28.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2019). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7