The Level of Mathematics Teacher Students' Acquisition of Teaching Moves for Mathematical Structures and Its Relationship to Their Academic Achievement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i4.8105

Keywords:

Teaching moves for mathematical structures, teacher students, acquisition level, academic achievement

Abstract

Objectives: The current study aims to measure the level of acquisition of teaching moves related to mathematical structures among mathematics student teachers, to explore the correlation between this acquisition and their academic achievement levels, and to investigate the differences in the level of acquisition according to their varying levels of academic achievement.

Methods: The study employed a descriptive methodology, using two tools: a test to assess mathematics student teachers' acquisition of teaching moves (in concepts, generalizations, and algorithms) and an academic achievement test categorizing students into high, average, and low achievers. The tools were applied to 36 undergraduate Mathematics Education students enrolled in the Spring 2023 Mathematics Teaching Methods course.

Results: The results showed that the percentage of students reaching the acquisition level (70% of the total score) varied by teaching move type, ranking highest in generalizations, followed by concepts, and then algorithms. There was also a statistically significant correlation between the overall acquisition of teaching moves and academic achievement. Additionally, significant performance differences were found among student teachers, linked to their academic achievement levels.

Conclusion: The study concluded that assessing student teachers' understanding and application of teaching strategies is essential for ensuring education quality. This assessment helps in choosing effective strategies and enhancing teaching practices, showcasing their ability to apply theoretical principles in teaching mathematical structures. The study recommended a comprehensive review of mathematics teacher preparation programs to emphasize both conceptual understanding and practical application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldemir Engin, R., Karakuş, D., & Niess, M. L. (2023). TPACK development model for pre-service mathematics teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4769-4794.

Barham, A. I. (2020). Exploring in-service mathematics teachers perceived professional development needs related to the strands of mathematical proficiency (SMP). EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1882.

Buforn, À., Llinares, S., Fernández, C., Coles, A., & Brown, L. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge of the unitizing process in recognizing students’ reasoning to propose teaching decisions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 425-443.

Hussein, Y., & Csíkos, C. (2023). The effect of teaching conceptual knowledge on students’ achievement, anxiety about, and attitude toward mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em2226. ISSN:1305-8223 (online). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12938

Kuchkarov, M., Khakimov, S., & Abdullaeva, B. (2023). Systematic use of mathematical concepts in professional training of students. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 65, p. 10013). EDP Sciences.

Manouchehri, A. (2017). Implementing mathematical modelling: The challenge of teacher educating. Mathematical modelling and applications: Crossing and researching boundaries in mathematics education, 421-432.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). NCTM Principals & Standards for Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Nıeto, C. R., Rodríguez, F., & García, J. G. (2021). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ mathematical connections in the context of problem-solving about the derivative. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(1), 202-220.

Runnalls, C., & Hong, D. S. (2020). “Well, they understand the concept of area”: pre-service teachers’ responses to student area misconceptions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(4), 629-651.

Tashtoush, M. A., Wardat, Y., Aloufi, F., & Taani, O. (2022). The effect of a training program based on TIMSS to developing the levels of habits of mind and mathematical reasoning skills among pre-service mathematics teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), em2182.

Yurekli, B., ıksal-Bostan, M., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2020). Sources of preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in the context of a mathematics teaching methods course. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(5), 631-645.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-15

How to Cite

Alhosni, K. Z. (2024). The Level of Mathematics Teacher Students’ Acquisition of Teaching Moves for Mathematical Structures and Its Relationship to Their Academic Achievement. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 51(4), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i4.8105

Issue

Section

Curriculum and Instruction
Received 2024-07-02
Accepted 2024-08-21
Published 2024-12-15