The Current Problems of Philosophical Anthropology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i4.2365

Keywords:

Philosophical anthropology, cultural activity, cultural habitat, human, objective justification

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to highlight the most important concrete problems which philosophical anthropology studies in the current condition of man, in particular, the problem of "the gap between two worlds: a world lived emotionally, and a world formed by technology in addition to the disturbances and the various forms of violence inherent in contemporary societies; the problem of the relationship between man and the world in which he lives and his relationship with others. In this context, multiple aspects are studied such as love, fearlessness, kindness, generosity, friendship, respect and empathy.

Methods: This study adopts a method of analysis and comparison where the problems were analyzed within the framework of a comparison between the various works of Paul Ricœur, Max Schiller, Husserl, Heidegger, etc.

Results: The study shows that such problems result from the lack of reconciliation between emotional and moral experience and the domininance of technology in all aspects of life. Moreover, the lack of connection between existence and empathy nullifies moral values and destroys the foundations of coexistence in the world with and for others.

Conclusions: This study recommends investing the results reached in philosophical anthropology research and stressing the need to reconcile the world lived emotionally and the world shaped by technology. Further, it is necessary to pay attention to the other who is different from oneself within the framework of cultural and social coexistence based on friendship and respect as well as mutual recognition, in order to achieve a better life for humanity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Husserl, E. (1950). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie, traduction réalisée Paul Ricœur, Paris, Les Éditions Gallimard,

Ravaisson, F. (1984). de l’habitude, paris, édition fayard.

Greisch, J. (2001). Paul Ricoeur. L’itinérance du sens, Grenoble, Jérôme Millon,

Rawls, J.(1987(. Théorie de la justice, tra Catherine audar, paris, édition du seuil.

Michel, J. (2006). Paul. Ricœur une philosophie de l’agir humain, Paris, Editions du Cerf.

Michala, M.) 2004). Pensée le corps , France, (1éd) P.U.F.

Dupuy, M. B. (1959) La philosophie de Max Scheler, Son évolution et son unité. Tome I. La critique de l'homme moderne et la philosophie théorique. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France,

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). la phénoménologie de la perception, paris ,Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). le visible et l'invisible: paris, Gallimard.

Scheler, M. (1955). Le formalisme en éthique et l'éthique materiale des valeurs. Essai nouveau pour fonder un personnalisme éthique. Traduit de l'allemand par M. de Gandil- lao. Paris, Gallimard,

Scheler, M. (2003). Nature et formes de la sympathie, Traducteur, M. Lefebvre, Paris, Petite Bibliothèque Payot

Ricœur, P. (1950). Philosophie de la volonté Tom 1 Le volontaire et l’involontaire Paris. Aubier-Montaigne,

Ricœur, P. (1960). Philosophie de la volonté II. Finitude et culpabilité, Paris, Aubier.

Ricoeur, P. (1977). La sémantique de l'action, Paris, Éd. du CNRS.

Ricoeur, P. (1986). à l’école de la phénoménologie, paris, librairie philosophique J.VRIN.

Ricoeur, P. (1990). Soi-même comme un autre, L’Ordre Philosophique, Paris, Éditions du Seuil,

Ricœur, P. (2001). Le Juste, Paris, Broché.

Ricœur, P. (2004). Parcoures de la reconnaissance, Paris, Gallimard.

Ricœur, P. (2013(. Anthropologie philosophique, paris, éditions du seuil.

Monteil, P. (2013). Ricœur politique. France, presse universitaires de renne.

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Kerrache, B. . (2024). The Current Problems of Philosophical Anthropology. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 51(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i4.2365

Issue

Section

Philosophy
Received 2022-09-18
Accepted 2023-08-27
Published 2024-07-30