The Rhetoric of Argumentation in Al-Hamadhani`s Harzi Maqāmāh

Authors

  • Nahla Al-Shalabi Department of Arabic Language and Literature, The College of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8522-9442

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i3.2427

Keywords:

Emitter (sender), recipient, discourse stylistics, Al-Hamadhani, the Harzi Maqāmāh

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the mechanics of argumentation in the Harzi Maqāmāh through investigating the intrinsic content that represents its deep structure and underpins the author’s artistic craft of generating meaning out of structure. Because verbal structure is governed by the rationale of its genesis, the foregrounding of its corresponding intended purport becomes the main function of the Maqāmāh, including its rhetorical mysteries which contribute to producing a persuasive impact on the text’s receiver. Consequently, more light is shed on the situations in which such persuasive impact takes place.

Methods: The study uses sample extracts from the Maqāmāh to orient argumentative significance through various stylistic options. This was done through an analytical study of the rhetorical linguistic levels (expression, eloquence, and meaning) that Badi' al-Zaman Al-Hamadhani employed. The study then represented these aspects using the ladder of persuasion, which reflected the extent of Al-Hamadhani's creativity and persuasive abilities. Data analysis depended on the availability of textual evidence.

Results: The Maqāmāh proved to be rich in rhetorical devices that allowed the text to possess the power of persuasive literary enjoyment, conveying a social message that called for combating the wretched submission to superstition and witchcraft, and exposed the foolishness of its victims. These rhetorical devices manifested through al-Hamdhani's use of various arguments, relying on verbal actions, particularly the most effective ones (genuine interrogation) and figures of speech (metonymy and declaration). Their aesthetic power transformed into a source of persuasion. The author's utilization of persuasive techniques (conciseness, emphasis, and denial) became a prominent characteristic in the structure of the Maqāmāh.

Conclusion: The study contends that robust argumentative mechanics are manifest in the style of Badi’e Al-Zaman Al-Hamadhani. The tools he deployed include rhetorical flourish, appealing prosodic traits, and superb stylistic features embedded in diverse semantic content and rhythmical patterns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulrahman, T. (2006), Tongue and Scales or Brainstems, (Edi. 1), Morocco: Arab Culture Center.

Al-Azawi, A. (2010), Alhajaj In Language, (Edi.1), Jordan: Within the book of Alhajjaj its concepts and scops, Modern Book World, Vol.1.

Al-Dahri, A (2011), Al Hajjaj Its Concept and Its Fields Theoretical and Applied Studies In The New Rhetoric, (Edi 1), Morocco: School publishing and distribution company.

Al-Hamadhani, A (398). Maqamat Badi Al Zaman Al Hamadhani, (Edi 3), Audited and explained by: Mohammed Abdo, Lebanon: Dar Alkotob Al-ilmyah, 2005.

Aljarjani, A. (471 H), Evidence of miracles, (Edi 3), investigated by: Mahmoud Shaker, Egypt: Alkhangi Library, 1992.

Aljarjani, A. (471 H), Secrets of rhetoric in the science of rhetoric, (Edi 1), Encyclopedia of Arabic Poetry, 2009.

Almabkout, S. (2010), Rhetorical reasoning, (Edi 2), Lebanon: Dar Alketab Aljadeed.

Al-Maidani, O. (1996), Arabic Rhetoric “Its Foundations Sciences and Arts” (Edi. 1), Lebanon: Dar Al-Qalam.

Al-Qazwini, K (682 H), Clarification in rhetoric sciences, Investigated by: (Edi.1), Ibrahim Shams Aldin, Lebanon: Dar Alkotob Alilmiah, 2003.

Al-Sakkaki, Y. (626) Miftah Al-olum, Audited by: Na’im Zarzour, (Edi. 2), Lebanon: Dar Alkotob Al-ilmyah, 1987.

Alzarkashi, B (794 H), Proof in the sciences of the Qur'an, Investigated by: Abo Alfadel Aldemyati, (Without Edition), Egypt: Dar Alhadith, 2006.

Ayyad, S. (1985), Stylistic Research Directions: Stylistic Studies, (Edi 1), Saudi Arabia: Dar Al-Olum.

Bano Hashem, H. (2014), Al-Hajjaj Theory with Chaim Perelman, (Edi.1), Lebanon: Dar Al-Kitab Aljadeedah.

Ibn Al-Athir, D. (637 H), The Proverb in The Literature Of The Writer And Poet, (Edi.2), Investigated by: Mohammed Mohiee Al-Deen, Lebanon: Al-Maktaba Al-Asriya.

Ibn Faris, A. (2001), Dictionary of Language Standards, (Edi. 1), Lebanon: Dar Ihyaa Al Torath Al Arabi.

Ibn Manzour, (711 H), Lisan Al-Arab, (Edi. 6), Lebanon: Dar Sader, 1997, Vol 2.9.

Jalal Al-Din, M. (739), Summary in the sciences of rhetoric, “which is a summary of the book Miftah Al-Ulum by Al-Sakaki”, investigated by: Abed Al Hamid Hindawi, Lebanon: Dar Alkotob Al-ilmyah.

Lasheen, A. (1999), Al-Badi in the light of the methods of the Holy Quran, (Without Edition), Egypt: Dar Alfeker Alarabi.

Sebawaih, A. (796), Alketab, (Edi 1), Encyclopedia of Arabic Poetry, 2009.

Solah, A. (2011), In the Hajjaj Theory Applications and studies, (Edi.1), Tunisia: Meskilyati for publication.

Periodicals:

A’rab, H. (2001), Alhajjaj and Hajjaic reasoning, World of Thought Journal, 1, (30).

Alraqbi, R. (2011). Argumentative reasoning and its mechanisms of action, World of Thought Journal, The Supreme Council for Culture, Arts and Literature, Kuwait, October-December 2011, 2(40).

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

Al-Shalabi, N. (2024). The Rhetoric of Argumentation in Al-Hamadhani`s Harzi Maqāmāh. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 51(3), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i3.2427

Issue

Section

Arabic Language and Literature
Received 2022-09-22
Accepted 2023-06-22
Published 2024-05-30