Revisiting William J. Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice’s Shylock from a Critical Discourse Analysis

Saif Al-Deen Lutfi Ali  Al-Ghammaz

doi:10.35516/hum.v51i2.2834

Authors

Saif Al-Deen Lutfi Ali Al-Ghammaz English Language and Literature Department, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2339-0729

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i2.2834

Keywords:

Jew, Shylock, speech, The Merchant of Venice, William Shakespeare

Abstract

Objectives: This study uses the speech of Shakespeare's well-known character Shylock as a case study to examine how language manipulation impacts power, establishes a connection between language and societal structure, and considers the effect of blending different ideologies.

Methods: This study adopts critical discourse analysis to demonstrate the societal marginalization of the Jewish character Shylock by correlating his speech with the trilogy "identity, ideology, and Venetian society" related to his Jewish identity.

Results: The study shows that once Shylock decides and works to achieve the trilogy of "identity, ideology and power", he fails miserably due to his inhumane traits and personality. Furthermore, Shylock's insistence on the literal interpretation of the bond paves the way to damage his reputation and status, neglecting the power of other influential figures to properly manage the language of his “deed,” thereby destroying Shylock's "Power" in Venetian society

Conclusions: The study demonstrates that language is a significant factor in shaping how societies exercise "power" over others, harm undesirable "identities," and adopt the "ideologies" of others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd-Rabbo, M. M. (2019). Overlapping character variations in Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart. JNT-Journal of Narrative Theory, 49(1), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1353/jnt.2019.0002

Al-Ghammaz, S., Al-Khatib, W., & AbuRas, F. (2022). Emotional Abuse in Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour”. Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan Journal for Human and Social Studies, 3(3), 213-223.

Barnet, S. (2000). Prodigality and time in The Merchant of Venice. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 1(1), 26-30.

Beauchamp, G. (2016). Shylock's conversion. Humanities, 24(1), 55-92.

Blanchard, J. (2009). Contesting constancy in The Merchant of Venice. Renascence, 61(4), 209-220.

Billing, M. (2008). The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse & Society, 19(6), 783-800.

Davoodi, A. (2013). The application of critical discourse analysis in literary criticism: Challenges and solutions. Criticism and Metacriticism, 20(1), 100-114.

Deng, W., & Wu, Y. (2013). The new exploration to The Merchant of Venice. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1624-1629.

Dutta, U. (2013). Representation of race in four Shakespearean plays: Titus Andronicus, Othello, Antony and Cleopatra, and The Merchant of Venice. European Academic Research, 1(6), 922-948.

Ganyi, F. (2013). The Jew as racial villain: A historico-generic interpretation of Shylock, Iago and Barabbas as victims of racial circumstances in Elizabethan drama. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(6), 122-131.

Harp, R. (2010). Love and money in The Merchant of Venice. Modern Age, 52(1), 37-44.

Hartman, G. (2011). The Tricksy word: Richard Weisberg on The Merchant of Venice. Law & Literature, 23(1), 71-79.

Heller, A. (2000). The absolute stranger: Shakespeare and the drama of failed assimilation. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy & Social Theory, 1(1), 147-167.

Hodge, B. (2012). Ideology, identity, interaction: Contradictions and challenges for critical discourse analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 5(2), 1-18.

Hunt, M. (2003). Shakespeare's Venetian paradigm: Stereotyping and sadism in The Merchant of Venice and Othello. Papers on Language & Literature, 39(2), 162.

Jackson, K. (2007). Shylock: The knight of faith. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 8(2), 67–82.

Long, M. (2012). Merchantry, usury, villainy: Capitalism and the threat to community integrity in The Merchant of Venice. Anthropoetics, 17(2), 1-16.

Masugi, K. (1997). Race, the rule of law, and The Merchant of Venice: From slavery to citizenship. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 11(2), 197- 223.

Mcavan, E. (2011). Economies of sacrifice in The Merchant of Venice: God, the gift and Shakespeare. The Bible and Critical Theory, 6(1), 201-211.

Nickel, J. (2001). Shylock in Washington: the Clinton crisis, The Merchant of Venice, and Enjoyment of the Law. Textual Practice, 15(2), 317-335.

Qutami, M. (2022). Countering normalized violence in Aboulela’s “The Museum” and El Guindi’s “Trading in my Arab”. Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan Journal for Human and Social Studies, 3(3), 224-235.

Picker, J. (1994). Shylock and the struggle for closure. Judaism, 43(2), 173-189.

Schuman, S. (2002). Authorizing meaning in The Merchant of Venice. Text & Performance Quarterly, 22(1), 47-62.

Shakespeare, W. (1992). The Merchant of Venice. Roma Gill (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Sherman, D. (2013). Governing the wolf: Soul and space in The Merchant of Venice. Journal of Medieval & Early Modern Studies, 43(1), 99-120.

Tiffany, G. (2006). Law and self-interest in The Merchant of Venice. Papers on Language & Literature, 42(4), 384-400.

Turner, H. S. (2006). The problem of the more than-one: Friendship, calculation, and political association in The Merchant of Venice. Shakespeare Quarterly, 57(4), 413- 442.

Weinstein, B. (2007). Shakespeare's forgivable portrayal of Shylock. Jewish Bible Quarterly, 35(3), 187-192.

Wodak, R. (2001). What is CDA about? A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. Discourse and Society, 1(1), 1-16.