The State of the National Innovation System of Jordan: Key Actors Perspective

Authors

  • Safaa Alwedan Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i5.3452

Keywords:

National Innovation System (NIS), sustainable development, science, technology, innovation (STI), research and development (R&D), Jordan

Abstract

Innovation results from various interactions between a set of economic agents and enterprises, it forms a series of processes and links between industrial institutions, public agents, the university community, and research institutions to develop scientific research activities and technological development. On this basis, the study aimed to provide a better understanding of the status of the Jordanian system of innovation from key actors’ perspectives in the Jordanian system of innovation. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with representatives from various subsystems of the Jordanian system of innovation. The results showed a system’s strengths and weaknesses, and Public-private interactions and networks in the system. Furthermore, it showed the main issues that must address and the most important financial and non-financial policy required instruments to stimulate innovation for Jordanian businesses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arocena, R., Sutz, J. (1999). Looking at national innovation systems from the south. Industry and Innovation 7(1), 55-75. doi. 10.1080/713670247.

Barkhordari, S., Fattahi, M. and Azimi, A. (2019). The Impact of Knowledge-Based Economy on Growth Performance: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 10 (1): 1168-1182. doi. 10.1007/s13132-018-0522-4.

Chaabouni, R. (, 2008). Progress towards the Implementation of the National Innovation System in Tu-nisia,” Communications of the IBIMA, Volume 2, 188-191.

Chang, H. (1997). "Institutional structure and economic performance: some theoretical and policy lessons from the experience of the Republic of Korea". Asia Pacific Development Journal 4 (1), 39-56.

Creswell, W. (2005). Educational Research. Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (2nd). Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, USA.

Dahlman, C., and Nelson, R. (1995). Social absorption capability, national innovation systems and economic development. In: Koo, B. Perkins, D. (Eds.), Social Capability and Long-Term Economic Growth. Macmillan, London.

DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey,S. (2005). Red Tape and Public Employees: Does Perceived Rule Dysfunction Alienate Managers?, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,15(1), 133–148.

Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Eggink, M. (2012). Innovation System Performance: How to Address the Measurement of a System’s Performance, Journal of Innovation & Business Best Practices, 1,1-9. DOI. 10.5171/2012.593268.

ESCWA. (2016). Survey of Economic and Social Developments in the Arab Region 2015-2016, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, United Nations (eds).

Feeney, K. and DeHart-Davis, L. (2009). Bureaucracy and Public Employee Behavior: A Case of Local Government, Review of Public Personnel Administration 29 (4), 311–326.

Freeman, C. (19820. Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness, Draft paper submitted to the OECD Ad hoc-group on Science, technology and competitiveness, August 1982, mimeo. Later published as Freeman, C. (2004), 'Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness', Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 540-52.

Freeman C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan, Frances Printer Publishers, London, New York.

Freeman, C., 1995. The National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5-24. DOI. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309.

Golden, W., Higgins, E., and Lee, S. (2003). National Innovation Systems and Entrepreneurship, CISC Working Paper No. 8, Centre for Innovation and Structural Change, National University of Ireland, Galway.

Gu, S. (1999). Implications of National Innovation Systems for Developing Countries: Managing Change and Complexity in Economic Development. UNU-INTECH, Maastricht.

Hamidi, S., and Berrado, A. (2017). Framework for National Innovation Determinants, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Rabat, Morocco, April 11-13, 2017.

Hamidi, S., and Benabdeljalil, N. (2013). National Innovation Systems: the Moroccan Case, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 75, 119 – 128. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.014

Hornidge, A. (2011). "Knowledge Society" as Academic Concept and Stage of Development - A Conceptual and Historical Review, in Beyond the Knowledge Trap: Developing Asia's Knowledge-Based Economies(eds Menkhoff, T. E, H. Wah, C and Pang, E) World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NL, pp.87-128.

Hou, C., and Gee, S. (1993). National systems supporting technical advance in industry: the case of Taiwan. In: Nelson, R. (ed.), National Innovation System. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

ILO. (2017). School-to-Work Transition Surveys (database), International Labour Organization, Geneva.

Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., and Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National Innovation System in Less Successful Developing Countries: the Case of Thailand, Research Policy 31(8-9), 1445-1457.

Kalu, F., and Bwalya, J. (2017). What Makes Qualitative Research Good Research? An Exploratory Analysis of Critical Elements, International Journal of Social Science Research, 5 (2), 43-56. doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v5i2.10711.

Kim, L. (1993). National system of industrial innovation: dynamics of capability building in Korea. In: Nelson, R. (ed.), National Innovation System. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kumar, J. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Lundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.

Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, New York.

Nohl, M. (2009). Interview und Dokumentarische Methode: Anleitungen für die Forschungspraxis (3 ed.). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.

Nour, s. (2013). "Regional systems of innovation in the Arab region," MERIT Working Papers 2013-012, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems, OECD publications, Paris.

OECD. (1999). Managing national innovation systems, OECD publications, Paris.

Scott, G. and S. K. Pandey. (2000). The Influence of Red Tape on Bureaucratic Behavior: An Experimental Simulation, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,19(4), 615–633.

Scott, G. and Pandey, S. (2005). Red Tape and Public Service Motivation: Findings from a National Survey of Managers in State Health and Human Services Agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration 25(2), 155–180.

Sultan, S., and Soete, L. (2012). Innovation for Development: The Case of Jordan, Dirasat, Administrative Sciences, 39, (2), 321 -327.

UNESCO.( 2016). Science Report: Towards 2030, UNESCO Publishing, Paris.

UNESCO. (2016). The Future of scientific advice to the United Nations: a summary report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations from the Scientific Advisory Board, UNESCO Publishing, Paris.

UNCTAD. (2018). Technology and Innovation Report 2018: Harnessing Frontier Technologies for Sustainable Development. United Nations publication. New York and Geneva.

WFP. (2019). Jordan Country Strategic Plan (2020-2024).

Wong, P. (1999). National innovation systems for rapid technological catch-up: an analytical framework and a comparative analysis of Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. In: Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the DRUID’s Summer Conference 1999. Rebild, Denmark.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Alwedan, S. . (2022). The State of the National Innovation System of Jordan: Key Actors Perspective . Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 49(5), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i5.3452