حالة نظام الابتكار الوطني في الأردن: وجهة نظر الجهات الفاعلة الرئيسة
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i5.3452الكلمات المفتاحية:
نظام الابتكار الوطني، التنمية المستدامة، العلوم والتكنولوجيا والابتكار، البحث والتطوير، الأردنالملخص
ينتج الابتكار من التفاعلات المختلفة لمجموعة من الوكلاء الاقتصاديين والمؤسسات، ويشكل سلسلة من العمليات والروابط بين المؤسسات الصناعية والوكلاء العامين ومجتمع الجامعة ومؤسسات البحث من أجل تطوير أنشطة البحث العلمي والتطوير التكنولوجي. وعلى هذا الأساس، هدفت الدراسة إلى توفير فهم أفضل لوضع نظام الابتكار الأردني من منظور الفاعلين الرئيسيين في نظام الابتكار الأردني. تم إجراء خمسة عشر مقابلة معمقة مع ممثلين من مختلف النظم الفرعية لنظام الابتكار الأردني. أظهرت النتائج نقاط القوة والضعف في النظام والتفاعلات والشبكات بين القطاعين العام والخاص في النظام. علاوة على ذلك، فقد أظهرت القضايا الرئيسة التي يجب معالجتها وأهم السياسات المالية وغير المالية المطلوبة الأدوات لتحفيز الابتكار للشركات الأردنية.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Arocena, R., Sutz, J. (1999). Looking at national innovation systems from the south. Industry and Innovation 7(1), 55-75. doi. 10.1080/713670247.
Barkhordari, S., Fattahi, M. and Azimi, A. (2019). The Impact of Knowledge-Based Economy on Growth Performance: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 10 (1): 1168-1182. doi. 10.1007/s13132-018-0522-4.
Chaabouni, R. (, 2008). Progress towards the Implementation of the National Innovation System in Tu-nisia,” Communications of the IBIMA, Volume 2, 188-191.
Chang, H. (1997). "Institutional structure and economic performance: some theoretical and policy lessons from the experience of the Republic of Korea". Asia Pacific Development Journal 4 (1), 39-56.
Creswell, W. (2005). Educational Research. Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (2nd). Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, USA.
Dahlman, C., and Nelson, R. (1995). Social absorption capability, national innovation systems and economic development. In: Koo, B. Perkins, D. (Eds.), Social Capability and Long-Term Economic Growth. Macmillan, London.
DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey,S. (2005). Red Tape and Public Employees: Does Perceived Rule Dysfunction Alienate Managers?, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,15(1), 133–148.
Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Eggink, M. (2012). Innovation System Performance: How to Address the Measurement of a System’s Performance, Journal of Innovation & Business Best Practices, 1,1-9. DOI. 10.5171/2012.593268.
ESCWA. (2016). Survey of Economic and Social Developments in the Arab Region 2015-2016, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, United Nations (eds).
Feeney, K. and DeHart-Davis, L. (2009). Bureaucracy and Public Employee Behavior: A Case of Local Government, Review of Public Personnel Administration 29 (4), 311–326.
Freeman, C. (19820. Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness, Draft paper submitted to the OECD Ad hoc-group on Science, technology and competitiveness, August 1982, mimeo. Later published as Freeman, C. (2004), 'Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness', Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 540-52.
Freeman C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan, Frances Printer Publishers, London, New York.
Freeman, C., 1995. The National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5-24. DOI. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309.
Golden, W., Higgins, E., and Lee, S. (2003). National Innovation Systems and Entrepreneurship, CISC Working Paper No. 8, Centre for Innovation and Structural Change, National University of Ireland, Galway.
Gu, S. (1999). Implications of National Innovation Systems for Developing Countries: Managing Change and Complexity in Economic Development. UNU-INTECH, Maastricht.
Hamidi, S., and Berrado, A. (2017). Framework for National Innovation Determinants, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Rabat, Morocco, April 11-13, 2017.
Hamidi, S., and Benabdeljalil, N. (2013). National Innovation Systems: the Moroccan Case, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 75, 119 – 128. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.014
Hornidge, A. (2011). "Knowledge Society" as Academic Concept and Stage of Development - A Conceptual and Historical Review, in Beyond the Knowledge Trap: Developing Asia's Knowledge-Based Economies(eds Menkhoff, T. E, H. Wah, C and Pang, E) World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NL, pp.87-128.
Hou, C., and Gee, S. (1993). National systems supporting technical advance in industry: the case of Taiwan. In: Nelson, R. (ed.), National Innovation System. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
ILO. (2017). School-to-Work Transition Surveys (database), International Labour Organization, Geneva.
Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., and Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National Innovation System in Less Successful Developing Countries: the Case of Thailand, Research Policy 31(8-9), 1445-1457.
Kalu, F., and Bwalya, J. (2017). What Makes Qualitative Research Good Research? An Exploratory Analysis of Critical Elements, International Journal of Social Science Research, 5 (2), 43-56. doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v5i2.10711.
Kim, L. (1993). National system of industrial innovation: dynamics of capability building in Korea. In: Nelson, R. (ed.), National Innovation System. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kumar, J. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Lundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.
Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, New York.
Nohl, M. (2009). Interview und Dokumentarische Methode: Anleitungen für die Forschungspraxis (3 ed.). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Nour, s. (2013). "Regional systems of innovation in the Arab region," MERIT Working Papers 2013-012, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems, OECD publications, Paris.
OECD. (1999). Managing national innovation systems, OECD publications, Paris.
Scott, G. and S. K. Pandey. (2000). The Influence of Red Tape on Bureaucratic Behavior: An Experimental Simulation, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,19(4), 615–633.
Scott, G. and Pandey, S. (2005). Red Tape and Public Service Motivation: Findings from a National Survey of Managers in State Health and Human Services Agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration 25(2), 155–180.
Sultan, S., and Soete, L. (2012). Innovation for Development: The Case of Jordan, Dirasat, Administrative Sciences, 39, (2), 321 -327.
UNESCO.( 2016). Science Report: Towards 2030, UNESCO Publishing, Paris.
UNESCO. (2016). The Future of scientific advice to the United Nations: a summary report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations from the Scientific Advisory Board, UNESCO Publishing, Paris.
UNCTAD. (2018). Technology and Innovation Report 2018: Harnessing Frontier Technologies for Sustainable Development. United Nations publication. New York and Geneva.
WFP. (2019). Jordan Country Strategic Plan (2020-2024).
Wong, P. (1999). National innovation systems for rapid technological catch-up: an analytical framework and a comparative analysis of Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. In: Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the DRUID’s Summer Conference 1999. Rebild, Denmark.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2022 دراسات: العلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

