The Geopolitical Implications of NATO’s Enlargement in The Nordic Region: The Accession of Finland and Sweden 2022 A Case Study

Hasan Mahmoud  Jaber; Hasan Mohammad  Al Momani

doi:10.35516/hum.v51i6.5430

Authors

Hasan Mahmoud Jaber Prince Al Hussein bin Abdullah II School of Political Science, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-7248
Hasan Mohammad Al Momani Prince Al Hussein bin Abdullah II School of Political Science, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-6682

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i6.5430

Keywords:

Geopolitical Analysis, The Future of NATO's Enlargement, Finland and Sweden NATO's Accession

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to examine and analyse the geopolitical implications of NATO's enlargement in the Nordic region through the accession of Finland and Sweden.

Methods: Utilising the case study method, this study describes analyses and attempts to predict the phenomenon of NATO’s enlargement through the membership of Finland and the prospected accession of Sweden to NATO. This method enables the researchers to provide an in-depth investigation and understanding of the correlation between different variables and dynamics that influenced NATO's enlargement in the Nordic region and the geopolitical implications of this enlargement.

Results: The accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO carries significant geopolitical implications, which establishes NATO's preponderance in the Nordic region and encircles Russia's vital sphere. This turning point represents an extensive strategic challenge for Russia, as it doubles the common borders to approximately 2,500 km.

Conclusion: This study concludes that Finland and Sweden's accession to NATO marked a turning point in the geopolitical, security and balance of power landscape in the Nordic region. Furthermore, the enlargement of the common borders between NATO and Russia will lead to a new interaction pattern, with increased chances of unintentional military skirmishes. Moreover, despite the democratic policies held by Finland and Sweden, the Realpolitik approach in foreign affairs remains most appropriate for security and survival. Eventually, the study emphasises the importance of classical geopolitical assumptions and the significance of the Realism paradigm in interpreting international relations and issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adomeit, H. (2006). Inside or Outside? Russia's Policies Towards NATO. The Multilateral Dimensions in Russian Foreign Policy. Centre for Russian Studies.

AlMomani, H., (2020). "Geopolitical Rational of Jordan's Partnership with NATO: A Jordanian Perspective", Jordan Journal of Law and Political Sciences, pp. (57-79).

Bagratuni, M. (2011). Russia and The 2010 NATO Strategic Concept: New Era of Partnership or Wishful Thinking? Calgary: Canadian Defence & Foreign Policy Institute.

Brzezinski, Z. (1986). Game Plan: A Geostrategic Framework for the Conduct of the U.S.–Soviet Contest. The Atlantic Monthly Press.

Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The Grand Chessboard. Basic Books, Presus Books Group.

Cimbala, S. J. (2013). Russian Threat Perceptions and Security Policies: Soviet Shadows and Contemporary Challenges. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies, pp. 1-15.

Cancian, M. (2021). Future NATO Enlargement. Center for Strategic & International Studies.

Chang, F. (2017, September 28). Sweden’s Importance to NATO’s Defense of the Baltics. Retrieved from Foreign Policy Research Institute: https://www.fpri.org/2017/09/swedens-importance-natos-defense-baltics/

Christiansen, J. W. (2001). NATO Expansion: Benefits and Consequences. The University of Montana.

Consulting, K. M. (2021). Russian Forces in The Western Military District. The Center for Naval Analyses.

Daniel J., P. (2006). “Prospects for Finland and Sweden to Pursue Closer Defense Cooperation with NATO”, Naval Postgraduate School.

Dolan, C. J. (2023). The Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy and NATO: Continuity and Change From The Cold War to the Rise of China. Palgrave Macmillan Publications.

Donnelly, J. (2005). "Realism". In S. B. Linklater, Theories of International Relations (pp. 29-54). Palgrave Macmillian Publications.

Dugin, A. (2015). Last War of the World-Island: The Geopolitics of Contemporary Russia. ARKTOS.

Eichler, J. (2021). NATO’s Expansion After the Cold War: Geopolitics and Impacts for International Security. Springer Publications.

Gray, C. (1977). The Geopolitics of the Nuclear Era: Heartland, Rimlands and the Technological Revolution. Crane, Rusak.

Griffiths, M. (2008). International Relations: The Key Concepts. Routledge Publications.

Guardian, T. (2022, May 16). Putin: NATO Military Infrastructure in Finland or Sweden Would Provoke Response from Russia – video. Retrieved from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2022/may/16/putin-nato-military-infrastructure-in-finland-or-sweden-would-provoke-response-from-russia-video

Herráez, P. S. (2021). 21st century: The return to the struggle for Rimland? Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies.

Isachenkov, R. C. (2021, October 18). Russia Suspends its Mission at NATO, Shuts Alliance's Office. Retrieved from Politico: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/18/russia-suspends-mission-nato-shuts-office-516189

J. Baylis, J. Wirtz, C. Gray. (2019). Strategy in the Contemporary World. Oxford University Press.

Janne Hakala, Jazlyn Melnychuk. (2021). Russia's Strategy in Cyberspace. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence.

Kochis, L. C. (2022). Finland’s and Sweden’s NATO. The Heritage Foundation.

Kremlin. (2007, February 10). Speech and The Following Discussion at The Munich Conference on Security Policy. Retrieved from en.kremlin.ru: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24034

Kriz, Z. (2015). NATO After The End of The Cold War: A Brief History. Brno: Muni Press.

Mackinder, H. (1943). The Round World and the Winning of the Peace. Foreign Affairs, (vol. 21, no. 4 (7/1943), pp. 595–605.

Matr, A. S. (2015). NATO-Russia Relations, A Brief Analysis From The Disintegration Of The USSR To Celtic Manor. LUISS University.

Mazis, I. (5. March. 2014). Methodology For Systemic Geopolitical Analysis According to Lakatosian Model Definition of Modern Systemic Geopolitics. Séminaire de Avrasya Ensitüsü İstanbul Üniversitesi (pp. 473-482). Istanbul: Ioannes Mazis.

McCalla, R. (1996). NATO's Persistence after the Cold War. International Organization.

McStravick, R. J. (2020). “The Transformation of The Scandinavian Security Policy Since The Crimean Annexation: Implications For U.S and NATO Policy”. Naval Postgraduate School.

Mearsheimer, J. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After The Cold War. International Security, 5-56.

Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton and Company Publication.

Mearsheimer, J. (2013). "Structural Realism". In Tim Dunne (Ed.), International Relations Theories: Discipline And Diversity, (Third Edition ed., pp. 77-93). Oxford University Press.

Mearsheimer, J. & Rosato, S. (2023). How States Think? The Rationality of Foreign Policy. Yale University Press.

Memorandum, N. T. (2022, June 28). Retrieved from NATO.int: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/220628-trilat-memo.pdf

Ministry of Defence, F. (2022, May). Trilateral Statement of Intent. Retrieved from Ministry of Defence: https://www.defmin.fi/files/4231/Trilateral_Statement_of_Intent.pdf

Mitchell, M. (2022). Using The Principles of Halford J. Mackinder and Nicholas John Spykman to Reevaluate a Twenty-first-Century Geopolitical Framework For The United States. Comparative Strategy, pp. 407–424.

M. Melino, H. Conley, and J. Bermudez Jr., (2020, March 23). The Ice Curtain: Modernization on the Kola Peninsula. Retrieved from Center For Strategic & International Studies (CSIS): https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/200324_KolaPeninsula_layout_FINAL.pdf

National Security Strategy (2022). (n.d.). Retrieved June 2023, from The White House: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf

NATO Charter. (1949, April 04). Retrieved from North Atlantic Organization: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm

NATO. (2022, July 14). Relations with Russia. Retrieved from NATO: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_50090.htm#:~:text=Following%20the%20end%20of%20the,on%20security%20issues%20and%20cooperation.

NATO. (2022, July 22). Madrid Summit Declaration. Retrieved from NATO.int: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_196951.htm

NATO. (2022, July 29). Strategic Concept 2022. Retrieved from NATO.int: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf

NATO. (2022, June 28). Türkiye, Finland, and Sweden Sign Agreement Paving The Way for Finnish and Swedish NATO Membership. Retrieved from NATO.int: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_197251.htm

NATO. (2022, September 26). Relation with Sweden. Retrieved from NATO.int: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52535.htm

NATO-Russia Council. (2022, September 1). Retrieved October 2, 2022, from NATO.int: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50091.htm

Project, M. D. (2021, August 2). 9K720 Iskander (SS-26). Retrieved from Center for Strategic and International Studies: https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/ss-26-2/

Reuters. (2022, November 24). Hungary to Ratify NATO Membership For Finland, Sweden Early Next Year - PM Orban. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/polish-pm-says-hungary-promised-ratify-nato-membership-finland-sweden-2022-11-24/

Robert Dalsjö, C. B. (2019). Bursting the Bubble: Russian A2/AD in the Baltic Sea Region: Capabilities, Countermeasures and Implications. Swedish Defence Research Agency.

Robert, M. (1996). NATO's Persistence After The Cold War. The MIT Press.

S. Naji & F. Soltani. (2014). Levels of Analysis in International Relations and Regional Security Complex Theory. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 166-171.

Singh, D. (2023). The Tripartite Realist War: Analysing Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Palgrave Macmillan Publications.

Smaine, D. & Gharbi, M. (2018). The Debate Over NATO's Endurance and Enlargement After The End of The Cold War. The Academia Journal of Social and Human Studies, 183-192.

Snyder, G. (1990). Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut. Journal of International Affairs, pp. 103–123.

Spykman, N. (1944). The Geography for The Peace. Harcourt, Brace And Company, Inc.

Spykman, N. J. (1942). America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. Harcourt Brace.

Sutch & Elias. (2007). International Relations: The Basics. Routledge Publications.

Thomas Frer, L. K. (April, 2018). Russia and NATO: How to Overcome Deterrence Instability? London: European Leadership Network.

Thomasen, G. (2022). NATO-Russia Relationship: Perspectives from Russia. BASICS.

Trenin-Straussov, P. (1999). The NATO-Russian Permanent Joint Council in 1997-1999: Anatomy of a Failure. Berlin Information-Center for Transatlantic Security.

Von Hlatky and Wenger. (2015). The Future of Extended Deterrence: The United States, NATO, and Beyond. (S. &. Von Hlatky, Ed.) Georgetown University Press.

Wallace, T. (2009). Why NATO Endures. Cambridge University Press.

Wallensteen, P. (2002). Understanding Conflict Resolution. London: Sage Publications.

Walt, S. (1985). Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security, pp. 3–41.

Waltz, K. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, pp. 44–79.

Waltz, K. (2001). Man, The State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.

Wienberg, C. (2022, May 19). Finnish Support for NATO Membership Jumps to 76% in Latest Pol. Retrieved from Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-09/finnish-support-for-nato-membership-jumps-to-76-in-latest-poll?leadSource=uverify%20wal