Implications of Solipsism in Samuel Coleridge's "Frost at Midnight" and "Dejection: An Ode"

Manal  Aburumman; Ahmad Y.  Majdoubeh

doi:10.35516/hum.v50i4.5760

Authors

Manal Aburumman Department of English Language and Literature, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8391-8425
Ahmad Y. Majdoubeh Department of English Language and Literature, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-9682

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i4.5760

Keywords:

Samuel Coleridge, solipsism, imagination, existence, poetry, philosophy

Abstract

Objectives: This research aims to examine Samuel Coleridge's "Frost at Midnight" (1798) and "Dejection: An Ode" (1802). It explores the implications of solipsism in these two poems.

Methods: To achieve this purpose, the research reviews some major works in philosophy that dwell on solipsism, briefly traces the evolution of solipsism, how some philosophers and literary critics define and employ the concept in literature, and how solipsism specifically features Coleridge’s thought. Through a critical and an analytical reading of the two chosen poems, the research highlights solipsistic inclinations. Additionally, the research valorizes how Coleridge uses poetry to negotiate his own philosophy and highlight his skeptical view of the world.

Results: This analysis eventually manifests how the existence of the external world becomes merely a reflection of the poet's mind, and surroundings acquire their meanings according to his state of mind.

Conclusions: By examining the relationship between solipsism and Coleridge's two poems, the research suggests a more comprehensive revision of Coleridge’s poetry on the one hand, and introduces new possibilities for exploring the affinity between romantic literature and solipsistic philosophy on the other hand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams, M. (1971). Natural Supernatural: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Arrington, R. (1974). Solipsism and Literature. Review of A Common Sky: Philosophy and the Literary Imagination by A. D. Nuttall. The Sewanee Review, 82, 26-31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27542819.

Beller, M. (1984). The Fire of Prometheus and the Theme of Progress in Goethe, Nietzsche, Kafka, and Canetti. Colloquia Germanica, 17, 1-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23982375.

Burwick, F. (2009). Coleridge’s Conversation Poems: Thinking the Thinker. Romanticism, 14, 168-182.

Bygrave, S. (I986). Coleridge and the Self: Romantic Egotism. New York: Macmillan.

Cioffi, F. (2015). Solipsism and Utopia: Fredric Brown, Charles Yu, Ludwig Wittgenstein. In The Individual and Utopia: A Multidisciplinary Study of Humanity and Perfection, (pp. 133-148). Ellis Ashgate Publishing.

Coleridge, S. (2006). Frost at Midnight; Dejection: An Ode. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. (8th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Eldridge, R. (2020). On Knowing How to Live: Coleridge's “Frost at Midnight.” Swarthmore College, 10, 213-228.

Hrsak, P. (2011). Solipsism- An Extreme of Rationalism. University South Bohemia, Czech Republic.

Mays, J. (2019). Coleridge’s Dejection Ode. London: Palgrave Macmilan,

Moore, M. (1998). Who's Solipsistic Now? The Character of Chaucer's Troilus. The Chaucer Review, 33, 43–59.

Nuttall, A. (1974). A Common Sky: Philosophy and the Literary Imagination. University of California Press.

Reid, N. (2006). Coleridge, form and symbol, or the ascertaining vision. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..‏

Russell, B. (1945). History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and schuster.

Solipsism. (2020). Merriam-Webster.com.

Taylor, A. (2009). Coleridge's Self-Representations. In Oxford Handbook of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, (pp. 107-124). Ellis Ashgate Publishing Limited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Teke, Ch. (2014). The Romantic Self as Transmuting and Progressing: A Critical Appraisal of S. T Coleridge’s Poetic Expression. New Academia, 1, 47-63.

Virtanen, R. (1986). The Spectre of Solipsism in Western Literature. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 19, 59-76.

Wolfreys, J., & et al. (2002). Key Concepts in Literary Theory. Edinburg University Press