David Mamet’s Oleanna: A Contravention of University Ethics Through Controversial Defamation

Hamid Hammad  Abed

doi:10.35516/hum.v50i6.7083

Authors

Hamid Hammad Abed Center of Strategic Studies, University Of Anbar, Anbar, Iraq https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-6691

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i6.7083

Keywords:

Defamation, ethics, Mamet, Oleanna, University

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the potential risks associated with lecturer-student interactions in a university setting. It also endeavors to underscore the roles that instructors and students play within the academic environment and how they respond to any potential issues that may arise.

Methods: The study adopts a critical approach to analyze Mamet's Oleanna. It relies on textual analysis of the play, complemented by an interview with the dramatist David Mamet to enhance the understanding of his intentions. The language used by each character, considered a fundamental element, is crucial in unveiling their genuine motivations.

Results: The study demonstrates that many significant problems can be identified and effectively managed. It also affirms that the relationship between the professor and the student is inherently contentious unless built on mutual respect and understanding. Ignoring appropriate university ethics may lead to instances like Carol defaming Professor John. Therefore, establishing a calm and secure learning atmosphere, free from improper behavior by some lecturers or students, is deemed the most suitable approach.

Conclusions: The study concludes that individuals may intentionally conceal their true intentions to avoid embarrassment. Manipulating goals to justify means is identified as a violation of university ethics. Professor John, instead of violating university ethics like Carol, accepted defamation and humiliation. This emphasizes the importance of maintaining ethical standards in academic settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbotson, S. (2003).Thematic Guide to Modern Drama. London: Greenwood Press.

Adler, Th. (2009). David Mamet. Magill's Literary Annual.

Bean, K. (2001). A few good men: Collusion and violence in Oleanna. In Gender and Genre: Essays on David Mamet (pp. 109-123). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

Bigsby, C. W. (2004). David Mamet: all true stories. Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: David Mamet, 163-201.

Christiansen, R. (1992). It's Been a Great Year. Chicago Tribune.

Elysa, G. (2009). Oleanna" revival: Just as relevant, provocative now. USA Today.

Esche, E. (2004). David Mamet. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers.

Kane, L. (2001). David Mamet in Conversation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Kohn, A. (2002). The Dangerous Myth of Grade Inflation. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Leibler, P. (1988). Dominance and Anguish: The Teacher-Student Relationship in the plays of David Mamet. Modern Drama.

Mamet, D. (1993). Oleanna. New York: Vintage Books.

Murphy, B. (2004). Oleanna: Language and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Piette, A. (2004). The 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Saur, D. K. (2000). Oleanna and The Children's Hour: Misreading sexuality on the post/modern realistic stage. Modern Drama, 43(3), 421-441.

Shipton, G. (2007). The annihilation of triangular space in David Mamet's Oleanna and some implications for teacher-student relationships in the era of mass university education. Psychodynamic Practice, 13(2), 141-152.

Skloot, R. (2001). Oleanna, or, the Play of Pedagogy. In Gender and Genre: Essays on David Mamet (pp. 95-107). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.