Asymmetric Cyberwarfare Strategy in International Relations: A Study in Theory and Application of the Russian-Ukrainian War

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.9115

Keywords:

Cyberwarfare, non-compliance, strategy, realism, international relations, Russian-Ukrainian war

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the understanding and interpretation of cyber war strategy and the controversy surrounding it, particularly its strategic overlap with concepts such as asymmetric warfare. It employs realist theories of international relations to provide explanations for the Russian-Ukrainian asymmetric cyber war strategy under study.

Methods: Given the novelty and complexity of the phenomenon with its multiple dimensions, this study relies on the inductive approach to examine the asymmetric Russian-Ukrainian cyberwarfare.

Results: The study concluded that the dynamic nature of the asymmetric Russian-Ukrainian cyber war highlights the inability and imbalance of the international system to address this type of conflict. This is particularly evident in the absence of a legal framework and a lack of international consensus on its classification, legitimacy, and legal adaptation—whether as "military" or unarmed armed conflict. As such, this war is uniquely complex, combining fifth-generation warfare, including cyber wars, and kinetic military action.

Conclusions: As states increasingly view cyberspace as integral to their political and strategic interests, the major divisions within new realism in international relations offer varied interpretations of states' intentions, interactions, and global policies. The study discusses the transformation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict within the context of the new geopolitical and geostrategic order, providing realistic interpretations of the war strategy, its implementation tactics, legitimacy, and international positioning, along with its implications for international relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J. (2001). Virtual defense. Foreign Affairs, 80(3), 98-112.

Aladekomo, A. (2022). Russian aggression against Ukraine, sovereignty, and international law. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4064020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4064020

Bildt, C. (2022). Are Sweden and Finland moving to apply for NATO membership? The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/03/16/are-sweden-finland-moving-apply-nato-membership/

Broad, W., et al. (2011). Israeli test on worm called crucial in Iran nuclear delay. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html

Duguin, S., & Pavlova, P. (2023). The role of cyber in the Russian war against Ukraine: Its impact and the consequences for the future of armed conflict. Workshop, European Union: Directorate General for External Policies of the Union. https://n9.cl/aa2l1

Hakmeh, J., & Naylor, E. (2022). How the tech community has rallied to Ukraine’s cyber-defence. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/07/tech-community-rallied-ukraine-cyber-defence-eu-nato

Held, D., et al. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics, and culture. Stanford University Press.

Lerman, R., & Zakrzewski, C. (2022). Elon Musk’s Starlink is keeping Ukrainians online when traditional internet fails. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/19/elon-musk-ukraine-starlink

McMillan, R. (2014). Was Stuxnet built to attack Iran's nuclear program? PC World. https://www.pcworld.com/article/503296/was_stuxnet_built_to_attack_irans_nuclear_program.html

McNamara, R. (1968). The essence of security: Reflections in office (1st ed.). Strategic Studies Institute.

Melzer, N. S. (2011). Cyberwarfare and international law. Center for Security Studies, Switzerland, 8-17. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/k75k4mCOI

Metz, S., & Johnson, D. V. (2001). Asymmetry and U.S. military strategy: Definition, background, and strategic concepts. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep11225

Nakashima, E. (2012). U.S. accelerating cyberweapon research. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-accelerating-cyberweapon-research/2012/03/13/gIQAMRGVLS_story.html

Partington, R. (2022). G7 nations strip Russia of ‘most favoured nation’ status. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/11/g7-nations-drawing-up-plans-impose-heavy-tariffs-russia-ukraine#top

Paul, C. (2008). Information operations—Doctrine and practice: A reference handbook (Contemporary Military, Strategic, and Security Issues). Praeger Security International.

Security Council. (2022). UN Security Council provisional verbatim record of 8979th meeting. United Nations, Security Council, UN Doc. S/PV.8979. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/s3ykgp/pdf

Sloan, E. C. (2016). Modern military strategy: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Thornton, R. (2007). Asymmetric warfare: Threat and response in the 21st century (1st ed.). Polity Press.

Ukraine. (2022). What are the sanctions on Russia and have they affected its economy? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60125659

United Nations Dag Hammarskjöld Library. (2022). Letter dated 24 February 2022 from the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. UN Doc. S/2022/154. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3959647

النص الأصلي على الرابط التالي:

Retrieved from http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/67843.

United Nations, (2022), Security Council Fails to Adopt Draft Resolution on Ending Ukraine Crisis, as Russian Federation Wields Veto, United Nations, Meetings Coverage Security Council, Retrieved from https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14808.doc.htm .

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Hassan, A. M. M. (2026). Asymmetric Cyberwarfare Strategy in International Relations: A Study in Theory and Application of the Russian-Ukrainian War . Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 53(6), 9115. https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.9115

Issue

Section

Political Science
Received 2024-09-22
Accepted 2024-12-11
Published 2026-01-01