تأثير النهج المعرفي على دافعية الطلاب للغة الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية من حيث: قيمة المهمة وإدارة معتقدات التعلم والكفاءة الذاتية
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i1.4436الكلمات المفتاحية:
إدارة معتقدات التعلم، اللغة الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية، الكفاءة الذاتية، قيمة المهمة، الدافعيةالملخص
هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى اختبارتأثير النهج الأكاديمي المعرفي على تحسين دافعية الطلاب للغة الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية من حيث: قيمة المهمة، وإدارة معتقدات التعلم، والكفاءة الذاتية. وتكونت هذه الدراسة الكمية والنوعية من مرحلتين. المرحلة الأولى والتي استخدم فيها البحث شبه التجريبي والمكون من مجموعتين (تجريبية وضابطة)، حيث أجاب الطلاب فيها عن استبانة الدافعية، والمرحلة الثانية، حيث جرى جمع البيانات النوعية باستخدام المجموعة البؤرية التي أجريت على المشاركين في المجموعة التجريبية بهدف الحصول على تصوراتهم لتأثير برنامج التدخل لتحسين مجالات الدافعية الثلاثة. وقد جرى تحليل البيانات الكمية باستخدام الأحصاء الوصفي، واختبارTوتحليل التباين، والتحليل متعدد المتغيرات للتباين، كما نُسِخَت المقابلات وحُلّلت نوعيا. وكشفت الدراسة عن فاعلية استخدام النهج الاكاديمي المعرفي في زيادة دافعية الطلاب من حيث قيمة المهمة، وإدارة معتقدات التعلم، والكفاءة الذاتية. وأوصت الدراسة باستخدام هذه الطريقة لطلاب اللغة الثانية في مساقات القراءة الاكاديمية.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Ahmadi, M. R. (2017). The impact of motivation on reading comprehension. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 1-7. URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-35-en.html
Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. Student perceptions in the classroom, 1, 327-348.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to research in education: Cengage Learning.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behaviour. Psychological Review, 64(6 Pt.1), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Berkeley, S., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2011). Reading comprehension strategy instruction and attribution retraining for secondary students with learning and other mild disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371677
Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (Vol. 1, pp. 53-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bowers, E., & Keisler, L. (2011). Building academic language through content-area text: Strategies to support ELLs: Strategies to support English language learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
Chamot, A. U. (2009). The CALLA handbook implements the cognitive academic language learning approach. White Plains, NY: Pearson.
Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.703
Coutinho, S. (2008). Self-efficacy, metacognition, and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 165-172.
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivation in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/330107
Duffy, G. G. (2002). The case for a direct explanation of strategies. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 28-41). New York: Guilford Press.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105-121). New York: Guilford Press.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference: Routledge.
Guthrie, J. T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. The Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 343-366. https://doi.org/10.1086/461929.
Hu, X., Hennebry, M. L., & Cheung, C. L. (2019). Language learning motivation of students from a special education school in Hong Kong. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 68-81. Retrieved from
https://caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/view/602.
Karabinus, R. A. (1983). Nonequivalent group designs: The use of ANCOVA, multiple regression, repeated ANOVA, and effect size. Evaluation Review, 7(6), 841-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8300700608
Karbalaei, A. (2011). Assessing reading strategy training based on CALLA model in EFL and ESL context. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 16(27), 167-187.
Karimi, M. N. (2018). Prior topical knowledge and L2 proficiency as determinants of strategic processing in English for Academic Purposes multi-texts comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1177058.
Lee, C.-Y. (2015). Changes in self-efficacy and task value in online learning. Distance Education, 36(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019967.
Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of populations: methods and applications: John Wiley & Sons.
Li, Y., & Wang, C. (2010). An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 144-162.
Litosseliti, L. (2003). Using focus groups in research. London, UK: Continuum.
Loh, E. K. (2019). What we know about expectancy-value theory, and how it helps to design a sustained motivating learning environment. System, 86, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102119.
Marimuthu, R., Muthusamy, C., & Veeravagu, J. (2011). Metacognitive strategy training through the cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA) as a way to improve reading comprehension performance among students of an English language course at UiTM Penang. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 7(1), 64-93.
Mizumoto, A., & Takeuchi, O. (2009). Examining the effectiveness of explicit instruction of vocabulary learning strategies with Japanese EFL university students. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 425-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809341511
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
Rasekh, Z. E., & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. Tesl-Ej, 7(2), 1-15.
Ravari, M. R. (2014). The effect of reading strategies training on enhancing reading comprehension and reading motivation among Iranian EFL Learners in Kerman. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(1), 409-421.
Rifa'i, S. (2013). The application of CALLA method to improve reading comprehension on narrative text for the students of SMP. CAKRAWALA PENDIDIKAN, 15(2), 218-229.
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. J. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219-235). New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_10.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1.
Sigmon, M. (2019). Increasing Student Motivation in Content-area Lessons Using Written Response. Reading Improvement, 56(1), 1-10.
Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 272-286.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003.
Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Relations among reading motivation, reading amount, and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.022.
Taghinezhad, A., Dehbozorgi, R., & Esmaili, N. (2015). The influence of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on the reading self-efficacy beliefs of Iranian EFL learners: An experimental study. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(4), 728-735.
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 213-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4.
Tsai, Y.-L., & Shang, H.-F. (2010). The impact of content-based language instruction on EFL students' reading performance. Asian Social Science, 6(3), 77-85.
Uccelli, P., & Phillips Galloway, E. (2017). Academic language across content areas: Lessons from an innovative assessment and from students’ reflections about language. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(4), 395-404.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.553.
Warner, R. M. (2012). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques: Sage Publications.
Wu, X. (2003). Intrinsic motivation and young language learners: The impact of the classroom environment. System, 31(4), 501-517. doi:10.1016/j.system.2003.04.001.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2023 دراسات: العلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

