البنية المفضلة في الجملة: تحليل مقارن للخطاب العربي

Allen, S. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38, 483–521.

Allen, S. (2007). Interacting pragmatic influences on children’s argument realization. In M. Bowerman & P.

Brown (eds), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: implications for learnability, 191-210. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Allen, S., & Schröder, H. (2003). Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In J.

Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 301-338. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.

Ashby, W., & Bentivoglio, P. (2003). Preferred argument structure across time and space: A comparative

Diachronic analysis of French and Spanish. In J. Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 61-80. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.

Ashby, W., & Bentivoglio, P. (1993). Preferred argument structure in spoken French and Spanish. Language

Variation and Change, 5(1), 61-76.

Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 491-504.

Brickell, T. C., & Schnell, S. (2017). Do grammatical relations reflect information status?

Reassessing Preferred Argument Structure theory against discourse data from Tondano. Linguistic Typology, 21(1), 177-208.‏

Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in

speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chui, K. (1992). Preferred argument structure for discourse understanding. Proceeding of COLING-29,

-1146. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C92-4180

Clancy, P. (2003). The lexicon in interaction. In J. Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument

structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 81-108. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.

Du Bois, W. (2003). Argument structure. In J. Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument

structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 11-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.

Du Bois, W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63, 805-855.

Fillmore, C. (1984). Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics

Society, 12, 95-107.

Everett, C. (2009). A reconsideration of the motivations for preferred argument structure. Studies in Language,

(1), 1-24.

Genetii, C., & Crain, L. (2003). Beyond preferred argument structure: Sentences, pronouns, and given referents

in Nepali. In J. Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 197-223. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.

Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Georgetown University Press.

Jiang, X., Zhang, F., Yan, R., & Chen, L. (2022). Preferred argument structure in the oral narratives of

adolescents with and without SLI. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 1-17.‏

Huang, C. (2012). Preferred argument structure in mandarin child language. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics,

(2), 119-168.

Huang, H., & Huang, S. (2009). Beyond preferred argument structure the discourse pragmatics of noun phrases

in Tsou. Studies in Language, 33(3), 499-527.

Kohn, S., & Cragnolino., A. (2003). The role of preferred argument structure for understanding aphasic sentence

planning. In J. Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 339-351. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.

Kumpf, L. (2003). Genre and preferred argument structure: Sources of argument structure in classroom

discourse. In J. Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 109-130. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.

Lin W. (2009). Preferred argument structure in Chinese: A comparison among conversations, narratives and

written texts. North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 2, 341-357.

Matsumoto, K. (2000). Intonation units, clauses and preferred argument structure in conversational Japanese.

Language Sciences, 22(1), 63-86.

Mazur-Palandre, A. (2015). Overcoming preferred argument structure in written French: Development, modality,

text type. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 25-55. Chicago

Mittelberg, I., Farmer, A., & Waugh, R. (2007). They actually said that? An introduction to working with usage

data through discourse and corpus analysis. In Gonzalez-Marquez, M. (Ed.), Methods in cognitive linguistics, 18, 19-52. John Benjamins Publishing.

Owens, J., Young, W., Rockwood, T., Mehall, D., & Dodsworth, R. (2010). Explaining Ø and overt subjects in

spoken Arabic. Information structure in spoken Arabic, 20-60.

Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In P. Cole, (Ed.) Radical pragmatics, 223-

, New York: Academic Press.

Serratrice, L. (2002). Syntax and pragmatics in the acquisition of Italian subjects. Paper presented at the Ninth

International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Madison, WI.

Weber, E. (2003). Nominal information flow in the talk of two boys with autism. In J. Du Bios, L. Kumpf, & W.

Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 354-383. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Pub.